Bill Moyers’ Attack on 9/11 Truth Exposes Defense Mechanisms in Full Force

I sent a link of this article to my friends on facebook with this comment:

Yes, I love Bill Moyers, too, but felt it was important to share this article to show how far the cover-up will go to mislead the public. Thankfully an organization of architects and engineers can defend the truth that is so much more profound than the liberal media spin.



Huffington Post Determined to Preserve "basic historic" Lies About 9/11

Preserving 9/11's Authentic History

by Joe Daniels, Huffington Post

Yesterday, the President of Iran, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, used a speech at the United Nations General Assembly to express his belief that "the majority of the American people, as well as most nations and politicians around the world agree" that "some segments within the U.S. governments orchestrated" the 9/11 terrorist attacks. His speech was a grievous insult to the families and friends of those who lost their lives that tragic Tuesday, as well as to a nation and world that remain outraged by the indefensible terrorist attacks perpetrated by al Qaeda.

WeAreCHANGE Minnesota Confronts Amy Goodman and Dan Rather on Bilderberg Group

Amy Goodman & Dan Rather confronted about Bilderberg Group

Dan Rather feigns ignorance. However, according to Bilderberg researcher and journalist Daniel Estulin, Rather,
formerly of CBS News, is a member in good standing.

Goodman’s facial expression, when asked about the Bilderbergs, in the video above is priceless,
so much so Minnesota Change decided to freeze-frame it and add the Jeopardy theme song.

Damn liars !

Noam Chomsky joins 9/11 “Jersey” widows in calling for release of 9/11 documents

February 14, 2007 -- Noam Chomsky has signed a petition written by the 9/11 “Jersey” widows calling for the release of classified documents relating to the 9/11 attacks. The Muckraker Report has contacted him by e-mail and verified that the individual listed on the petition is indeed Noam Chomsky. Chomsky’s name is #6432:

That said, now that Chomsky has agreed to sign the widows’ petition, the Muckraker Report would like to see the following people sign too: Alexander Cockburn and crew at Counterpunch, the editorial staff at the Nation, Michael Moore, Barbara Ehrenreich, Amy Goodman, Maureen Dowd, Frank Rich, Seymour Hersh, Nicholas Leman at the New Yorker, Christopher Hayes, anyone who writes for the Daily Kos, including Kos himself, and the absolutely divine Camille Paglia.

Like I said in my article from a few days ago, 9/11 Widows Keep on Asking the Tough Questions, the Jersey widows say that once they have 15,000 signatures on their petition, they’re going to head back to Capitol Hill. Right now they have 6,600 signatures, 1023 of them in the last 60 hours. Please e-mail the link of the petition to all your friends. Ask them to sign and forward the petition to their e-mail contacts. The Jersey widows have to get 8,400 more signatures. They need your help. Come on - give them a hand!


One gatekeeper starting to crack: Democracy for America

I suggest heading over to the Democracy for America blog, Blog for America, and comment on their current entry, What ever happened to......

DFA is a fine organization that is 'mainstream' progressive - it's the outshoot of the Dean campaign - and this is the second time that a topic closely related to 9/11 Truth has appeared on their blog.

I would suggest that people here go over and post some poite follow-up comments. Maybe even better would be to gently start posting interesting diary entries there, remembering to tailor it to a general audience of progressives, and see how much more headway can be made in bring up the issues we find important to this organization and to the community that reads it.

Sean Hannity meets CHANGE

Sean Hannity meets CHANGE

From: tcvm4141

Sean Hannity is a nationally syndicated radio and television personality who works for the FOX News Network.

Recently, Rupert Murdoch, owner of FOX News, as well as a score of other mainstream media outlets, has been reported on in the mainstream presses as one of Hillary Clinton's largest campaign contributors for the 2008 presidential race...

Hannity goes on the air every day and proceeds to attack Clinton, as well as the seemingly fictional entity he always refers to as "liberals"... meanwhile, the guy who signs his check is literally funding Hillary.

Sean Hannity is a yellow journalist and a propagandist and his job essentially is to mislead and confuse well-meaning conservatives about the truly important issues facing our nation, and also to reinforce the Left/Right paradigm, which serves to keep Americans blind to or divided about the tyranny that is quickly enveloping our country.

My brother and I confronted him about this fact, as well as some other very pertinent items of truth, at a bookstore in Long Island on 11/10/07.

Demand the truth now America!

Listen Carefully to a Master Gatekeeper: Chomsky dispels 9/11 "conspiracies" with "sheer logic"

Listen to a Master Gatekeeper: Chomsky dispels 9/11 "conspiracies"" with "sheer logic"

LOGIC? Hmmmm. Submitted for your valued critique and analysis.

The Art and Science of Gatekeeping.

Someone should refer him to,

Gatekeepers and web sites

I am interested in knowing which sites are acting a gatekeepers on 9/11 Truth. I just finished reading an article and comments on Buzzflash: "An Appeal to 9/11 Conspiracy Buffs" from Thu, 02/22/2007 - A BUZZFLASH GUEST CONTRIBUTION by Peter Michaelson. It was a pretty lame hit piece. The bulk of the comments were from sensible people familiar with the issues. One apparent troll continually brought in absurd arguments.

I went look for article to 9/11 Truth on Buzzflash, to see if they had ever published anything. The may have published some favorable articles, but this piece by Peter Michaelson took the cake for garbage.

So, are there any authors out there who are aware of sites that refuse all pro-9/11 Truth pieces? I know about Counterpunch. Some seem to allow 9/11 Truth comments, but no articles. GNN has links to a site that attempts to debunk 9/11 research, and a site that supports it. That is odd. Perhaps someone's idea of being fair and balanced?

What have you observed? I am most concerned with sites that are influential, that have a large readership. I have the germ of an idea that this information may be useful to us.

Mike Zimmer