Taking the "Booga Booga" engines to warp factor 9
Senior U.S. intelligence officials tell ABC News new intelligence suggests a small al Qaeda cell is on its way to the United States, or may already be here.
Posted Jul 10, 2007 10:42 PM PST
Category: COVER-UP/DECEPTIONS

You mean THESE "Al Qaeda?" (nudge nudge wink wink)
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/fakealqaeda.html

Remember in summer 2001, when the media was constantly running stories about Osama bin Laden, "pre-selling" the designated villain prior to the attacks? This feels the same.

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/

http://blogs.abcnews.com/theblotter/2007/07/al-qaeda-cell-i.html

While this reporter accepts the official version of 9/11, he at least expresses skepticism over the recent "terror plot" arrests and provides good reasons not to trust informants.

Casting a suspicious eye on some 'big' terror plots

Thursday, June 07, 2007

Some of the more spectacular anti-terrorism busts of the last few months have these elements in common:

Announcements laced with scary, end-of the-world warnings -- usually cast in the secretly taped words of the alleged plotters -- and crowds of law enforcement suits huddled close together so they all can get inside the TV camera lens as they warn of what might have been if they hadn't been so diligent.

A collection of unlikely suspects, ranging from Haitian stoners in Florida to a Central Jersey pizza deliveryman to a barely literate former airport employee.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/february2007/230207Olbermann.htm

Keith Olbermann asks the key question whether the statistics were intentionally or unintentionally wrong. David Boies, Olbermann's guest and the author or "Courting Justice", basically avoided the question saying it is just important that the data are wrong and we need to do something about it so we are safe.

Wrong answer. This prolongs the presumption that 9/11 was carried out by UBL etc., and that we remain in grave danger from Islamic terrorists. It also absolves anyone/everyone invloved with the bad data of guilt.

Later Olbermann asked "What are the risks going forward using bad data?"

Wrong question. He should have pressed the issue of possible government complicity in falsifying this data.

Maybe someday one of these self-proclaimed newsmen will get a spine and give up their anchor jobs for the truth. Charlie Sheen did not lose his job for 9/11 truth. Would Olbermann? What about Jack Cafferty?

Perhaps a write-in campaign asking them to sacrifice their jobs for truth.

Where are Dan Rather and Ted Koppell on the topics? Doesn't anyone out there in TV newsland have a conscience and a set of cajones?

Police State and Homeland Terror

Comment:Despite being imperfect, with the inherent obvious flaws & the numerous past violations the lists are in widespread use. the inaccuracies should encourage those concerned with human rights to call for their abandonment. There are no statistics as to the number of "terrorists" that have been thwarted through using these lists, but there are countless stories of innocents being the victims of these lists.

The use of annotations applied to the database and issuance of cards to 'pre-approved' low risk travellers, in order to indicate that certain people shouldn't be stopped is a violation of civil liberties. The identification of the entire general public as potential terrorists underscores the aim of Homeland security in criminalizing the innocent to further their police state aims.

By LESLIE MILLER, Associated Press Writer

Original Article here.

WASHINGTON - Thousands of people have been mistakenly linked to names on terror watch lists when they crossed the border, boarded commercial airliners or were stopped for traffic violations, a government report said Friday.

It is my firm belief that the terrorists we all speak of are indeed among us. There is an ongoing Conspiracy right here in NY! With the disaster at the WTC site, there is plenty of eveidence past and present that chimes in to re-assure us this is true.

Let's look at how the Towers fell, shall we? Many said in the beggining that "it looked like a controlled demolition" and seemingly changed their stories later on... hmmm?!?!?! There has been video released of The lease holder Larry Silverstein openly admiting that the fire department called him on sept 11th stating they arent sure they will be able to Knock down the fires in Building number 7. He then again openly admit's that he told the fire department to "PULL #7" which in the world of controlled demo to "detonate and bring down the building or structure at hand". Then silverstein tries to claim that each plane constituted as a seprate attack so that he should get more money. Can we say at the very least this is an insurance scam? I think it's a safe bet to say that.

Video of him saying this: [URL=http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7750532340306101329&q=Larry+silverstein+%22pull+building+7%22]http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7...l+building+7%22[/URL]