U.S. Intel: Iran Plans Nuclear Strike on U.S. [false-flag alert]

Rethug plans for preventing criminal investigations and keeping the White House; destroy tech infrastructure with an EMP and cause 70-90% depopulation, returning the US to the 19th century? Iran won't have a working nuke bomb (if they're really trying for one) for a decade, so if this happens, how likely is it that Iran will be the source?

Note to the fakes and trolls that cruise this site; do you really think your paymasters give a shit about you? How are you going to ensure you and your family aren't going to die if this is pulled off? You think have an enforceable guarantee just cuz you posted some BS comments on truth-seeking and progressive blogs? You're a liability to them because of what you know and have done; for the sake of your life, kids, posterity, country and soul, if you've been getting paid, please get documentation and blow the whistle ASAP. Record and post your phone conversations, emails, paycheck stubs, contract, whatever; Sibel Edmonds' life was threatened, and probably saved because she went to Congress, the DOJ IG, the media and the People,

Hey, Hot Shot

Why Bush folded on Iran by Juan Cole

July 31, 2008 | Pundits and diplomats nearly got whiplash from the double take they did when George W. Bush sent the No. 3 man in the State Department to sit at a table on July 19 across from an Iranian negotiator, without any preconditions. When Bush had addressed the Israeli Knesset in May, he made headlines by denouncing any negotiation with "terrorists and radicals" as "the false comfort of appeasement." What drove W. to undermine John McCain by suddenly adopting Barack Obama's foreign policy prescription on Iran?

Letter of Advice to a Young Warmonger

Another of the PNAC's "best and brightest" has added his voice to the chorus calling for a war of aggression against Iran.

The following letter to Kagan was forwarded from a friend. The linked images are disturbing.

"Dr. Kagan:

As you and your PNAC associates are working so assiduously to trigger a "pre-emptive" attack against Iran (a nation which has neither attacked nor threatened to attack either Israel or the US and is a signatory of the NNPT), and as you evidently take great pride in your "authorship" of the Iraq invasion, occupation and "surge", I am compelled to recommend a few photographs for your consideration. Although there are many thousands like them on the internet, somehow I sense you may not have had the opportunity to view them. As an academic myself, I understand how easily such abstractions as "war", "empire" and "national interest" can obscure the palpable facts of their realization.

With regard to the negotiations over Iran's "nuclear program"; here's what the Iranians should say to Bush and his handlers:

Ok, as a result of what allegedly happened to you on 9/11/01, you
claim to be fighting a "War on Terror", whereupon you attacked and
invaded Afghanistan and then Iraq. Now, apparently, under the rubric
of the said "War on Terror", you demand that Iran stop enriching
uranium - an activity we see as our legitimate, legal right.

We will agree to indefinately suspend the enrichment of uranium on our
soil under one simple condition: You prove, by way of a comprehensive,
independent, transparent, international investigation, into both the
attacks of 9/11/01 and the subsequent "Anthrax attacks", that the
events of 9/11/2001, transpired substantially as you have claimed they

And to demonstrate our good faith, we'll agree to immediately suspend
enrichment of uranium pending the outcome of the investigation;
moreover, we'll seek international donations to pay any expenses
associated with the new investigation.

The 911 Deception Continues - Featuring Dr. Robert Bowman and Micheal Keefer - July 14, 2008

The 9/11 Deception Continues

Monday July 14th, 7:30 PM

In association with



The 9/11 Deception Continues

The ‘war on terror’ fraud and the frame-up of the ‘Toronto 18’

An evening with Dr. Bob Bowman (USA) and Prof. Michael Keefer (U. of Guelph)

Bloor Street United Church, 300 Bloor Street West, Toronto at Huron, one block west of St. George Street, 2 blocks east of Spadina (Use St. George or Spadina subway, or park behind the church)

naval blockade of iran?! = WAR! call now!

Ready for a naval embargo against Iran? That's what AIPAC is lobbying congress for this week. Resolution 362 is the bill that is urging the imposition of "stringent inspection requirements on all persons, vehicles, ships, planes, trains, and cargo entering or departing Iran"... say again? How do you do that without the use of military force? The urgency and importance of this resolution cannot be overstated. Stopping this resolution would be a major setback for AIPAC. Call your Congressperson today and demand that they oppose Resolution 362, and tell your Senators to oppose Resolution 580, the Senate version. For more details, see:

Democracy Now 9/11 * Reflecting Pool Tour

Flyby News Notes -
Editor - Jonathan Mark -
June 29, 2008 - Democracy Now 9/11 * Reflecting Pool Tour

"We're trying to change the paradigm of human democracy,
of human governance, and that’s what this [NYC 9/11 Ballot Initiative] is
all about, changing the paradigm of human governance right here in New
York City by asserting that you saw something wrong that took place,
and you want to address it through using the tool of the Initiative, the
legislative power of citizenry to go after that fundamental change."

-- Mike Gravel
Former US Senator
Democracy Now! June 17, 2008

1) Democracy Now & 9/11 - NYC Ballot Initiative +
- - Update on NYC 9/11 Ballot Initiative
- - Reflecting Pool on the Road
- - BBC 9/11 Conspiracy Files Producer's New Blog Posting
- - Heartson life threatened for researching 9/11 - Video
2) U.S. escalating covert operations against Iran: report
- - Lawyers Guild Urges Special Prosecutor, War Crimes Commission
- - It Was Oil, All Along
- - Ex-Army scientist to get $5.8M in anthrax lawsuit
3) Leonard Peltier 2008 Oglala Statement – CNN King Assassination

Preparing the Battlefield

The Bush Administration steps up its secret moves against Iran.


by Seymour M. Hersh

Israel 'will attack Iran' before new US president sworn in, John Bolton predicts By Toby Harnden in Washington

Certainly sounds like they're prepping us, softening us up once again . . . between these comments and McCain's adviser's, Charlie Black, the other day. -- Betsy

Israel 'will attack Iran' before new US president sworn in, John Bolton predicts

By Toby Harnden in Washington

Last updated: 9:50 AM BST 24/06/2008

John Bolton, the former American ambassador to the United Nations, has predicted that Israel could attack Iran after the November presidential election but before George W Bush's successor is sworn in.
The Arab world would be "pleased" by Israeli strikes against Iranian nuclear facilities, he said in an interview with The Daily Telegraph.

"It [the reaction] will be positive privately. I think there'll be public denunciations but no action," he said.

Mr Bolton, an unflinching hawk who proposes military action to stop Iran developing nuclear weapons, bemoaned what he sees as a lack of will by the Bush administration to itself contemplate military strikes.

Ray McGovern on the Alex Jones show warns of "false flag attack" and possible nuclear strikes on Iran

June 24, 2008

Ray McGovern and Alex Jones discuss the possibility of an attack on Iran, to the benefit of the Neocons and Israel.

McGovern openly warns of a naval False Flag attack as one possibility to get things started.

32:14 7.49MB

Infowars | Alex Jones

ElBaradei warns against strike on Iran


(CNN) -- A military strike on Iran would turn the Middle East "into a ball of fire," said Mohamed ElBaradei, the head of the United Nations' nuclear watchdog agency.

ElBaradei made the remarks in an interview aired on Saturday by Al Arabiya TV. The interview comes a day after reports emerged that Israel conducted a large-scale military exercise that the United States believes is in part a message to Iran that Israel has the capability to attack its nuclear program.

"In my opinion, any military strike -- as I mentioned -- is the worst thing that can happen now," said ElBaradei, head of the International Atomic Energy Agency.

"It will make the Middle East turn into a ball of fire. It is a lot worse than having sanctions. A military strike will lead Iran, even if it plans today to manufacture a nuclear weapon, to establish a crash course to speed the process to have the weapon with the blessing of all Iranians, even those living in the West."

911 Blood & Oil * Deep State Violence * Marks

Flyby News Notes -
Editor - Jonathan Mark -
June 19, 2008 - 911 Blood & Oil * Deep State Violence * Marks

“The 'official conspiracy theory' of 911 is just such a lie.
Bush's official conspiracy theory requires a complete rewrite
of the laws of physics going back to Galileo, Newton, and
perhaps even Aristotle. It is more reasonable to conclude
that Bush is a part of a murderous plot to seize dictatorial
powers than to conclude that Galileo, Newton and Einstein
were just wrong about matter, motion, and the conservation
of both matter and energy. I don't they were wrong.
Rather --I think Bush is a goddamn liar!”

-- Len Hart

1) The 911 Blood on Bush ­ Deep State Violence ­ NYC Commission
- - The Blood on Bush's hands
- - 9/11, Deep State Violence, and the Hope of Internet Politics
- - General Accuses WH of War Crimes
- - Deals With Iraq Are Set to Bring Oil Giants Back
- - Tim Russert, Dick Cheney, and 9/11 ­by David Ray Griffin
- - Independent 9/11 Investigation -- Mike Gravel -- Democracy Now!
2) Bush Threatens Iran With Military Action ­ What’s Next?
- - Ray McGovern Asks Conyers to Impeach to Stop Bush Iran War

Bomb Iran? What's to Stop Us? By Ray McGovern June 19, 2008

Bomb Iran? What's to Stop Us?

By Ray McGovern - June 19, 2008

It’s crazy, but it’s coming soon – from the same folks who brought us Iraq.

Unlike the attack on Iraq five years ago, to deal with Iran there need be no massing of troops. And, with the propaganda buildup already well under way, there need be little, if any, forewarning before shock and awe and pox – in the form of air and missile attacks – begin.

This time it will be largely the Air Force’s show, punctuated by missile and air strikes by the Navy. Israeli-American agreement has now been reached at the highest level; the armed forces planners, plotters and pilots are working out the details.

Emerging from a 90-minute White House meeting with President George W. Bush on June 4, Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert said the two leaders were of one mind:

#2 Post "Next 9/11 in Houston ? ...War with Iran?"

Honestly, I do not know what to make of this. This is NOT front page. It is an onging collection of data. See my previous blog Titled "Next 9/11 in Houston ? ...War with Iran?"

This came across recently from friends:

Does anyone have input (besides just speculations)? If you have a more professional view on this article with pertinent information, you are welcome to post something fresh on your blog. I only wanted to bring this up in case it is important.

"...WMR has learned that at a meeting of tugboat captains last week in Houston, the possibility of an imminent terrorist attack on the Houston port was discussed."

"Carnaby's belief in HUMINT as a determinant of terrorist plans likely caused him to believe that Houston was in imminent danger for an attack. WMR spoke to Carnaby's intelligence and law enforcement colleagues who share his concerns."