This is a news report from Stewart Howe:
The link will take you to a short video, in which I report from the front lines in the fight for our freedom. It is my audition for a news reporter position at Infowars.com.
I really want this job. If you agree, after watching it, that we would all benefit from having me out there full time taking on the New World Order, PLEASE help spread this clip around, rate it up, and boost the view count. No matter what happens, I hope you enjoy it, and I thank you for taking a couple of minutes to watch it.
WeAreChangeLA delivers scientific proof of 9/11 TREASON to members of Congress and other D.C. players- Day 1
“I haven’t heard that, I don’t know that, I do know that err, that wall I remember was in danger, and they made a decision based on the danger… did it in a controlled fashion.”
He's not talking about wtc7, everyone else is, but he's talking about some "wall" that he remembers. Why are prison planet, as much as I respect them for the most part, saying this is his "conclusion" about wtc7? This makes us look pretty stupid and like classical "conspiracy theorists" clutching at statements and twisting them to mean falsely sensational things.
"Massachusetts Senator's conclusion directly contradicts 9/11 official story"
^ Not smart!
2004 Presidential Candidate Says Weakened Building Was Brought Down Based on Danger Posed to Surroundings
Aaron Dykes / JonesReport | April 22, 2007
Senator John Kerry was questioned concerning 9/11 during an appearance at Book People in Austin, Texas. Members of Austin 9/11 Truth Now asked Kerry about the officially unexplained collapse of WTC Building 7."
"I do know that that wall, I remember, was in danger and I think they made the decision based on the danger that it had in destroying other things-- that they did it in a controlled fashion."
Thanks to the dozen or so people who submitted this as a blog entry :)