Montreal

Is the suggestion of an attack in Montreal worse than 9/11 a genuine or fabricated scenario?

Source: http://www.cmaq.net/en/node/27172

Is the suggestion of an attack in Montreal worse than 9/11 a genuine or fabricated scenario?

Anonymous, Wednesday, April 11, 2007 - 21:37

Are Quebecers being psychologically “prepared�? to blame Muslim immigrant groups, for an even worst attack in Montreal than 9/11, in relation to the World Trade Center in the United States?

The Quebec political Establishment often makes public utterances on their professed interests to “stand-up for Quebec�?. However, the Quebec Political Establishment has substantively tied itself to the commercially profitable and military expansionist pro-war agenda of Anglo-American based political-military-industrial complex. This is most evident in the backroom support of the elite driven Quebec Political Establishment for the North American Union (NAU) agenda. Ken Hernandez provides the following detailed account of investigative research which he has made concerning matters pertinent. His accompanying conclusions and views do not necessarily reflect the conclusion and views of The Canadian:

Is The Suggestion of an Attack in Montreal Worse Than 9/11 Genuine or Fabricated?

http://www.blog.agoracosmopolitan.com/?p=217

Are Quebecers being psychologically "prepared" to blame Muslim immigrant groups, for an even worst attack in Montreal than 9/11, in relation to the World Trade Center in the United States?

The Quebec political Establishment often makes public utterances on their professed interests to "stand-up for Quebec". However, the Quebec Political Establishment has substantively tied itself to the commercially profitable and military expansionist pro-war agenda of Anglo-American based political-military-industrial complex. This is most evident in the backroom support of the elite driven Quebec Political Establishment for the North American Union (NAU) agenda. Ken Hernandez provides the following detailed account of investigative research which he has made concerning matters pertinent. His accompanying conclusions and views do not necessarily reflect the conclusion and views of The Canadian: