Muckraker Report

In case you missed it

This may well have been already reported here, but in case it got missed, I noticed it just now. Here is the link.


Former Fed analyst questions M1 currency component spike prior to 9/11

March 22, 2007 – William Bergman worked at the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago from July 1990 until early 2004. He served as an economist for eight years, and then moved to a senior analyst position in a new department researching financial market and payment system risk policy issues. In late 2003, he was asked to consider an assignment in the money laundering area. Bergman accepted the assignment, underwent a background check, received credentials affording access to confidential banking information, and began working in the area. He was told that he was “part of the fight against terrorism” and that he “had been asking good questions.”

One aspect of the assignment to the money laundering area was for Bergman to develop a paper that, if accepted, could serve as a reference source for the Federal Reserve System.

Haas- Muckraker Report- CIA letter supports assertion that OBL “confession video” was a sting operation

Many 9/11 truth seekers have long ago concluded that the issue surrounding the “confession video” is that it is a fake video – that the Osama bin Laden in the video is not Osama bin Laden at all. As I have previously admitted in earlier articles, I once held the fat bin Laden belief. However, thanks to the fine work of Muckraker Report contributing writer Maher Osseiran, and my further investigation into the videotape, I am now convinced that the video is indeed authentic. See Article - Taking the fat out of the fat bin Laden confession video

However, the translation of the “confession video” that the U.S. government provided the corporate media is significantly flawed, and the dates and circumstances related to the discovery of the video cannot possibly be accurate. Furthermore, the DoD claimed in its December 13, 2001 press release that the “video was filmed by unknown persons”. While the DoD may not have known who filmed the video at the time it issued its press release, I am now certain that the CIA did. The corporate media does not consider this type of information newsworthy. Why?

WTC7: Complaint for Injunctive and Declaratory Relief filed


THE WTC7: Complaint for Injunction and Declaratory Relief has been filed in United States District Court Southern District of New York!

May 8, 2007 – On February 28, 2007 I issued a Request for Correction to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). As of today, NIST has not responded. Yesterday, Attorney Jerry Leaphart of Jerry Leaphart & Associates (Danbury, CT) filed a Complaint for Injunctive and Declaratory Relief in United States District Court Southern District of New York on my behalf and on behalf of others similarly situated. The purpose of both the Request for Correction and this recent legal action is to stop the direction the government is heading regarding its final report on how World Trade Center Seven collapsed in 6.6 seconds on September 11, 2001.

For the rest of the article, go here:

Follow up to the “Prior knowledge of 9/11 attacks overheard in Hebrew” story: FBI looks for documents where they cannot be found


Follow up to the “Prior knowledge of 9/11 attacks overheard in Hebrew” story:
FBI looks for documents where they cannot be found

April 4, 2007 – His name is Andras Szekely. He was born in Budapest, Hungary – the son of Holocaust survivors. At age 18, Andras fled Hungary seeking work, financial opportunity, and a better life. He landed in Italy where he sought political asylum. From Italy he immigrated to Sweden where he says he was welcomed with “open arms”. Young, and with a strong curiosity for exploration, Szekely set out to travel across Europe. Soon he found himself yearning for Israel.

The debate with NIST that never was

Just a reminder that the debate with NIST would have taken place a few days from now; however, NIST "scientists" refused to defend their own work. Instead, NIST engineers choose safe speaking engagements in which they can deny the existence of molten metal at Ground Zero.

On January 31, 2007 the Muckraker Report canceled its effort to hold a National 9/11 Debate. We thank everyone who expressed interest in the event, particularly those patriotic Americans that were willing to publicly debate the government officials responsible for the “official” account of what happened on September 11, 2001. Jim Fetzer, George Nelson, Judy Wood, Philip Berg, Steven Jones, Morgan Reynolds, David Ray Griffin, and many others in the “Truth Movement” – the Muckraker Report salutes you and thanks you.

Muckraker Report makes a Request for Correction from NIST

Muckraker Report again boldly goes where most fear to tread!

Published: Thursday, March 1, 2007

Ed Haas

Effort to halt government WTC7 investigation launched

March 1, 2007 – The following Request for Correction was e-mailed to the National Institute of Standards and Technology on February 28, 2007. It will be certified mailed on March 1, 2007. Attorney Jerry Leaphart has informed me that he will work on the legal papers for an injunction this weekend.

The subject matter within this Request for Correction and pending filing for injunction is purposeful. The reader might be tempted to conclude that many other contradictions found within the government investigation of WTC1, WTC2, and WTC7 should have been referenced in this Request for Correction. I can assure you that great thought went into this effort and it mirrors the advice of counsel. What some might conclude as “too narrow” is actually advantageous to achieving the goal – the truth.

Please support the Muckraker Report in this effort.

February 28, 2007