New Pearl Harbor
The UK Telegraph reacts to the Richard Falk case: "UN Human Rights Official Claims 9-11 Was US Plot"
[NOTE: The headline the Telegraph chose to use, "UN Human Rights Official Claims 9-11 Was US Plot." is inaccurate and misleading, and is reproduced and preserved here at 911Blogger because of the significance of it being employed by a mainstream media institution like the Telegraph.
In his blog post Richard Falk did not "claim" or "suggest" that "9/11 was US plot" or that the "US government may have orchestrated the September 11 terrorist attacks." What Falk said was, there are "awkward gaps and contradictions in the official explanations," there was "an apparent cover up", and there are "well-evidenced doubts about the official version of the events: an al Qaeda operation with no foreknowledge by government officials." - loose nuke]
This article was placed today on World For 9/11 Truth, and appeared first in The Telegraph, also today. Pretty good exposure to have this in The Telegraph. URL: http://world911truth.org/un-human-rights-official-claims-9-11-was-us-plot/It will be interesting to watch how the US press, and world press, handles this developing story, particularly if he does, indeed, get fired.
Posted on 25 January 2011 |
911 Truth Rescue Me- Daniel Sunjata
D.S. is HOT!
He covers PNAC and the WHOLE BLUEPRINT like I have NEVER HEARD ANYONE DO BEFORE.
EVERYBODY SEE THIS PLS!
9/11: 'the new Pearl Harbor' By William R. Woodward - December 07, 2008 6:00 AM
Editor's note: The author is a UNH professor who sparked a controversy in September 2006 when he was quoted in a newspaper story as saying "government elites orchestrated 9/11" while summarizing literature on the subject. The university defended his academic freedom and he chose to let the firestorm subside. Now, he breaks the silence with his first opinion piece on the topic.
By William R. Woodward
On Dec. 7, 1941, our country was attacked by Japan. What do our children know of the economic and political reasons for this tragic event?
September 11, 2008
Dennis Bernstein and Bonnie Faulkner welcome David Ray Griffin about his newest book The New Pearl Harbor Revisited: 9/11, the Cover-Up, and the Exposé which contains new eyewitness pentagon attack testimony.
Additional David Ray Griffin Media:
I asked David Ray Griffin for permission to post his email here -- because of it's insightful content. He agreed, asking that I post it with all the names of the authors of the Appeal written to NIST.
Dear James, Steven, Kevin, Richard, Frank, Bob, Bill, and Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice,
I have just read your Appeal to NIST. It is absolutely brilliant and very useful.
(I will be quoting bits of it in an updated edition of The New Pearl Harbor, which I’m working on now.)
Thanks very much for this great contribution to the cause.
The Appeal to NIST was penned mainly by James Gourley and he deserves recognition for his work in the 9/11 Truth movement. It is available here: http://journalof911studies.com/volume/2007/AppealLetterToNISTGourleyEtAl... James and I have written a technical paper which we hope will be published soon. (I'm going to ask you to do a little prepatory homework; please work through the problems here: http://www.glenbrook.k12.il.us/gbssci/phys/Class/newtlaws/u2l4a.html . All four lessons are helpful.)
Not *directly* related to 9/11, but it touches on the PNAC "new Pearl Harbor" memorandum. This is a good viral video to spread to people outside of the awareness of 9/11 truth, to prime them that there are forces in our government that have military expansion on their mind, at any cost....
Update: Dr. Griffin has clarified the situation in an email to GW: "A woman in Norway, who is a former member of Parliament, said she was planning to nominate me (for 2008). But it's premature to be talking about it, as it may not come to pass."
Let's hope that it does come to pass.
1) Nobel Peace Prize Nominee.
World Renowned Theologian Dr. David Ray Griffin will be lecturing on the topic of his new book 'Debunking 9/11 Debunking' tonight in Spirit Dublin 8pm. Dr. Griffin has arrived in Dublin from a speaking engagement in Norway where he has been informed by a Nobel member that he and the 9/11 truth movement are to be nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize in the coming year!
2) Media Appearences Today Sept 11th 2007:
- Dr. Griffin will be appearing on Ireland AM on TV3 at 7.15am Tues Sept 11th.
"Hosted by Mark Cagney and Sinead Desmond, along with Alan Hughes and Aidan Cooney, Ireland AM includes a mixture of lifestyle stories, health, safety, education, entertainment and interviews with Ireland's top personalities."
This is a fantastic song by a really fresh band with a lot talent, check it out!
Contents Under Pressure - New Pearl Harbor
Their post-Louderfest '07 performance at The Pub.
He was just another New York City kid
and he became a firefighter like his daddy did
And he raised up his own little boy
And he died in Manhattan because of a government ploy
She was a cop and she was good at her job
With two kids at home, you know she was a single mom
She was called to work on a September day
And when the towers fell on her it took her life away.
It's all cause they needed new Pearl Harbor
Just a filthy fucking reason to go to war
And they made a trillion dollars
And they killed Americans by the score
He was from small town America
Quit school when he turned 18 and then he joined up
He found the truth in Afghanistan
Bin Laden’s Confession; is that what it is?
March 15, 2007 -- The tape released by the Pentagon on December 13, 2001 in which Osama Bin Laden is seen describing the events of 9/11 to a paraplegic visitor, Khaled Al-Harbi, is as close to a confession of prior knowledge as anyone is going to get at a dinner gathering.
Bin Laden: So if the plane hits the building here [gestures with hands], the portion of the building above will collapse. That was the most we could hope for, the most we expected: that the floors above the point of entry would fall. We were at one of the canyons at the time of the event, and we knew since Thursday that it would be on Tuesday. So we had the radio on.
That is enough for me, still, there are those who doubt and might say, well, the event had already taken place and Bin Laden knew enough detail to make up a story and take credit. Yes, there are those who might say that and for various reasons.
Speaking in Burlington, Vermont this past Friday evening, March 2nd, 2007, grieving mother, anti-war activist and author Cindy Sheehan extended her hand in support of researchers and activists skeptical of the official line on the 9/11 terror attacks and publicly questioned several key features in the establishment mythos surrounding the event.
When asked the question, “Do you buy into the government's account of events on 9/11 and if not, which part or parts do you suspect or have you proven to be false,” Sheehan:
1) called attention to the relevance of 9/11 by linking it to the claims used to justify the war in Iraq and her son's death there;
2) lent verbal support to a new, democratically-led 9/11 investigation;
3) lent verbal support and urged others to lend their support to 9/11 Truth researchers and activists;
4) referenced the video, “Loose Change” (http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7866929448192753501); and
5) referenced David Ray Griffin's book, The New Pearl Harbor: Disturbing Questions about the Bush Administration and 9/11 (http://physics911.ca/pdf/2004/griffin_pearl_harbor.pdf)
A video clip of the event is posted at the following URLs:
BY RUSS WELLEN
The trouble with means to an end is that it always seems to end mean.
When the 9/11 Truth Movement proposes that the Bush administration, or elements thereof, aided and abetted 9/11, the first reaction is often: "I just can't picture our government doing that."
Most are unaware of decorated World War II veteran Robert Stinnett's groundbreaking "Day of Deceit," which, with chilling documentation, demonstrates that Franklin Roosevelt not only allowed Pearl Harbor to occur, but instigated it. FDR wasn't the first leader to ruthlessly nudge developing events into a war. Nor was he the last.
Try citing that precedent while engaged in a dialogue about 9/11's inconsistencies. In the process of discounting 9/11 alternate history as a conspiracy, your counterpart is likely to reply: "If that's true, at least he did it for his country."
Oh, I get it. A good president is capable of using horrible means to an end he deems deserving. But a bad president like Bush (or his people) would never resort to something like that.