Published on Sep 9, 2016
TRANSCRIPT AND SOURCES: https://www.corbettreport.com/?p=19707
The official story of 9/11 is a lie. But Eberhart's story is a lie within that lie, designed to absolve himself and other members of the US military charged with defending American airspace that morning from the most catastrophic failure in that mission in their history. And not only did Eberhart survive with his career intact, he was praised as a "9/11 hero" and moved into the private sector after leaving NORAD in 2004, as chairman and board member of a number of companies that directly benefited from the post-9/11 police state and the post-9/11 war on terror.
INTERVIEW: CBS 8.52 am live feed Bryan Gumble talking to a man named ‘Stuart’:”we have an eyewitness on the phone....."
Transcription of the first interview by Bryan that day.
It was phone-recorded audio live feed while first images of Tower 1 played on screen,
so essentially, these are the first CBS moments regarding the 911 atrocity.
and can be heard at link:
BG. Whats your name?
BG. Stuart. Where are you right now?
S. I’m working at a restaurant in Soho.
BG. alright. so. tell us what you saw if you would.
S. I literally - I was waiting a table and I literally saw...it seemed to be a like a small plane...I just heard a couple of noises and it looked like it just bounced off the building and then I heard a....I just saw a huge like ball of fire on top, and then the smoke seemed to simmer down and it just, um, you know, alot of smoke just coming out and, thats pretty much the extent of what I saw.
BG. A private aircraft?
S that, umm, I’m not sure if it was....it just seemed like a smaller plane and I don’t think it was anything commercial.
February 18, Thursday morning, a small plane hit an Austin seven story office building.
The myth continues about how office fires can melt metal.
“...We have seen how floors can collapse after metal starts melting at fire intensity so high. This is a 7 story building… …And frankly, most occupants of buildings these days know when they tell you to evacuate, there has been a plane crash, you don’t stop. You just get out as quickly as possible….”
Taken from KVUE's “First Video: Plane crashes into building” which is now 3:17 minutes. http://www.kvue.com/news/local/First-video-Plane-crashes-into-building-84710897.html
Anything to do with 9/11, 2001?
HISTORY OF FLIGHT
On September 11, 2000, at 1246 eastern daylight time, a PA-28-161 (Cherokee), N9208N, and a PA-23-250 (Aztec), N54235, collided on final approach to land on runway 09 at the Saint Lucie International Airport in Fort Pierce, Florida. The Cherokee was operated by Flight Safety International and the Aztec was operated by the airline transport pilot under the provisions of Title 14 CFR Part 91 with no flight plans filed. Visual weather conditions prevailed at the time of the collision. The air transport pilot onboard the Aztec, and the private pilot, a Saudi Arabian citizen, onboard the Cherokee, both received fatal injuries. Both airplanes were destroyed. The Cherokee instructional flight departed Vero Beach, Florida, on a solo training flight at approximately 1220, and the Aztec departed Okeechobee, Florida, after refueling, at approximately 1230.
Let me begin by expressing my gratitude and respect for your honorable decision to turn up the heat on this evil conspiracy which has invaded our country from within our own borders. You are a very brave man, and deserve the respect of every true blooded American citizen!
Keep in mind I "SUSPECT" that this is what happened. I don't absolutely believe it, just suspect it.
Radical Muslim loyalists were distraught about US Imperial policies in the East, so they planned a hijacking. It was to be a regular hijacking, with the usual demands in exchange for the lives of the passengers. I suspect that "some" of the 19 hijackers listed were involved.
The US/Israeli intelligence complex caught wind of the plot...Then Along Came A Spider
Some people saw this as a chance to beef up their budget and they made a conscious choice to not only pave the way for it to happen, but, to change the outcome of the hijacking.
There were remote control devices installed in the planes and transponders and thermite based demolition charges placed at the WTC 1, 2, and 7. The reason why they destroyed building 7 was because that was the base information center for this to happen, thus, it and the evidence needed to be destroyed.
I suspect the hijackers had no idea they were on a suicide mission. The first two planes were guided to their destinations by remote control.
Just found this in the archive.org mpeg's, clear footage of what appears to be a plane part with an identifiable number. I remember having seen this once before, but the quality of this new version is undoubtly much better.
An original, not reencoded cut from the original file can be downloaded from here:
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=PBXMNIMW (this is an interlaced, NTSC, 480x480 MPEG2)
Astonishing fireballs,directed arson and insight in the preparator's mind.
This is my third post here,it's part of my tetralogy on WTC 1 and 2 collapses,the first post http://911blogger.com/node/18972 tried explain why NIST failed to properly address the precollapse inward bowing,the second post http://911blogger.com/node/19036 describes what really lead to the inward bowing,and the third post will be about immediate seconds before and after the collapse initiations)
Let me start with this basic premise:
9/11 was an shock and awe campaign.Let me to guide you through possible thoughts of the World Trade Center demolition preparators and try to compare the outcome with reality.This time I will not offer you „hard physical“ evidence,I'll show you a logical frame.
Let's start with this amazing photo
Lt. Robert Madeiros of the Arlington Police was on the scene of the Pentagon within minutes after the incident on 9/11. In this press conference on 9/13 he describes not seeing any pieces of any plane.
"I couldn't believe what happened. And they said it was a plane but i didn't see any pieces of any plane. I couldn't believe that a plane hit the building".
Lt. Robert Medairos didn't see any pieces, ABC, 15:25, 9/13
Chilling video by amateurs from Quebec.
showing the apocalyptic scene with clear view of the underneath of the second plane and a boat evacuation.
Apologies to all that have seen this before.
Jump to 3:40 for plane impact.
"I don't think anybody could have anticipated terrorists flying airplanes into buildings"
But we all forget so quick that Frank Cordor stole a Cessna on SEPTEMBER 11th, 1994 and tried to fly it into the White House. He crashed on the White House lawn and was killed instantly.
Did you hear that? SEPTEMBER 11th but…"I don't think anybody could have anticipated terrorists flying airplanes into buildings"
Here we have an incident that happened on 9/11/94 where a man tries to crash a plane into the White House, but yet…"I don't think anybody could have anticipated terrorists flying airplanes into buildings"
Here we have a person who turns a plane into a missile and tries to guide it into the most known government building, but…"I don't think anybody could have anticipated terrorists flying airplanes into buildings"
Here we have the exact style of attack, a person taking an aircraft and using it as a suicide weapon on the exact same day, 911 but…"I don't think anybody could have anticipated terrorists flying airplanes into buildings"
I am getting upset because these people are insulting my intelligence. They literally think we are that stupid to believe that…"I don't think anybody could have anticipated terrorists flying airplanes into buildings"
WTC 7 was riged with eplosives , waiting for the third airplane to hit. But the plane crashed before reatching NY.
Just an possible explanation why WTC7 went down in an , what looks like an controled demolision.
They hade to "Pull the building" when the plaine didnt crash. because they could not let the building standing, full with rigged explosives.
They would have been found othervise.
Sorry for the spelling im swedish.
A small aircraft has crashed into a NY building.