John Bolton gets questioned on his PNAC affiliations.

Helen Thomas talks about the PNAC with Wolf Blitzer.

Charles Rangel brings up the PNAC on Hannity & Colmes.

Dr. Frank Legge has published an excellent article “Conspiracy Theories, Myths, Skepticism, and 9/11: their Impact on Democracy” in the Journal of 9/11 Studies, today. It passed peer review prior to publication.

It begins thus: “Abstract: A discussion of conspiracy theories, myths and skepticism is presented. The importance of skepticism in a society in which myths may be deliberately created by authorities to manipulate the public is stressed. A range of methods of avoiding acceptance of myths, including application of the scientific method, is demonstrated using the events of 9/11. A clear understanding of events, unclouded by myths, is essential for the proper functioning of a democracy.

Key words: conspiracy, myth, skepticism, 9/11, democracy, propaganda, thermite, trans fats, cholesterol, PNAC, NIST, FEMA, EPA, Orwell

Frank Legge
PhD (Chem)

Anyone remember this?

"Long before "9/11 changed everything", former Secretary of the Treasury Paul O'Neill reveals that within days of taking office, President Bush was already planning the invasion of Iraq and the overthrow of Saddam."

Polls continue to show many Americans believe Iraq had something to with the attacks and many people see the Iraq war as a response to 9/11. Paul O'Neill was very clear about the Iraq agenda being rolled out 10 days into the first term.

The following CBS clip really needs to be included on any 9/11 DVD material that is being compiled.

Download Full CBS Report:

http://undergroundclips.com/video/ONeil_on_60min_320.mov

"It was all about finding a way to do it. That was the tone of it. The president saying ‘Go find me a way to do this,’" says O’Neill. “For me, the notion of pre-emption, that the U.S. has the unilateral right to do whatever we decide to do, is a really huge leap.”

-------------------------------------------------------------

Also ABC News:

This is a mind-boggling interview with Lewis Paul Bremer III (who ended up as the pro-council of Iraq.)

On 09/11/01 Bremer was the Chairman and CEO of Marsh Political Risk Practice which had offices in the WTC as did its parent company Marsh USA. They had a total of 1,700 employees assigned to the WTC. Bremer, himself, had an office in the South Tower. Nonetheless, this "counter-terrorism expert" makes no mention of any of this only three hours after the first plane flew directly into seven of the eight floors of WTC 1 occupied by Marsh USA. He is here on television prognosticating about who will turn out to be the culprits, with calm detachment. What is wrong with this picture?

Click here to watch 'George-Bush-calls-Bill-Bennett'
In case you hadn't heard, earlier this week, PNAC signatory William Bennett hung up on the 'Decider' as he was reminding the American people of his call not to believe "outrageous conspiracy theories" and coming out as a "Truther" by making clear statements that the Zelikow report fit this description perfectly. I can't believe it wasn't on the front page of the New York Times. One of the POTUS's and GWOT's biggest backers rudely hung up on him and his message. Although I am not holding my breath on the MSM to remedy this situation, I do think the 9-11 Truth and Justice community owes Bennett a barage of utterance (1-866-680-6464, 6-9am weekdays EST). How often is it that you get a chance to talk live with a PNAC member in front of multitudes around the country?

On a more serious tip...
With the threats flying hot and heavy, taking a hold of the people's airwaves and reaching multitudes by calling talk radio shows is a very potent pre-emptive tool. Call up and say that if there is another attack in the U.S., the first suspects we will look to are the members of the Bush administration especially Cheney, all signatories to the PNAC letter and anyone who has given a vague warning or threat of future attacks (Brezinski, Santorum et al.). If you record it, you will have created another type of chain-of-evidence pointing towards motive and intention. Moreover, if we explain that We the People intend to use the full measure of the Law and Justice to rectify this situation, it might possibly give anyone who's thinking of being complicit (commission and ommission both) in murderous and treasonous atrocities a second thought. I haven't been able to lay this out clearly on air yet. Here are a couple examples of somewhat successful 9-11 Truth calls:

Click here to watch 'Medved-show-w--terrorism-expert--Victor-Mordecai-'

Click here to watch 'Bill-Bennett--False-flag-terrorism---this-is-going-nowhere-'

Its crucial to keep opening up the conversation in the public sphere (as Keith Ellison and Paul Craig Roberts are doing very well from both the left and the right). This is really what this movement is about in many ways, the power of Truth and the possibility of transforming the dialogue. It's strength and our strength lies in the power of communication and openness rather than silence and secrecy. The tools of violence are clearly weighted towards the perpetraitors (though millions of American people dedicated to upholding the 2nd ammendment, representing the largest armed civilian force on the planet, have our backs if neccesary). But it is no coincidence that the 1st ammendment is 1st in power and preference. The tools of transformative sound, word and image are deeply weighted in our favor (despite the current corporatist stranglehold on the MSM) as evidenced by the recent powerful Truth fleecings of Congress members Susan Save-it! and John McCan't.

I was listening to this new Ron Paul interview and caught his mention of PNAC's now infamous "Pearl Harbor like event."

He was asked about his stance on the War on Terror. He said that it should be treated as a crime event and that the Neo-Con's were waiting "in the wings" to pounce on Iraq and the middle east. He then goes on to say that a think tank even talked about a "pearl harbor like event." This is positive in that it shows Paul has read all about PNAC and knows what they are up to. On the other hand, he still hasn't put 2 and 2 together about the Neo-Cons and 9/11.

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/opinionshop/detail?blogid=42&entry_id=18531

Listen to the whole thing if your interested, but this comment is around 32 minutes in.

(Discussion thread started at the Blogger Board.)

Eric Alterman has written extensively on the false claims of liberal media bias. He seems to be on the correct side of most issues, but here's a clip from his latest post:

If you wanted to find the root problem of how and why the Bush administration has screwed up the world, the answer I think lies less in the fact of 9-11 than in the opportunity that 9-11 gave the neocons to implement a strategy they that long sought. This is not even remotely to say the same thing as the fact that they planned or allowed 9-11 to happen. (I once had to leave the Air America studio while co-hosting with Janeane G because she was buying into this argument sans, of course, evidence.) It is merely to note that had it not been 9-11, it would likely have been something else. And you can find its most pristine expression here from the man Matt Y called "America's Worst Pundit," Charles Krauthammer, who announced in February 2001: "America is no mere international citizen. It is the dominant power in the world, more dominant than any since Rome. Accordingly, America is in a position to reshape norms, alter expectations and create new realities. How? By unapologetic and implacable demonstrations of will."

Am I the only one who detects more than a whiff of fascism in this naked celebration of the triumph of "will"?

Source: pnacnews

No, not the PNAC (A Project For A New American Citizen), the evil nasty PNAC (Project For The New American Century).

For those who don't know, the PNAC's (the evil nasty one) founder is Bill Kristol, who is also the Founder and Editor for the Weekly Standard.

"One of the AP reporters says he believes 9/11 was a Bush administration conspiracy hung on al Qaeda."

Robert B. Zoellick, a Project for the New American Century signatory, has been selected by the Bush White House to replace PNAC member Paul Wolfowitz as the new president of the World Bank.

Zoellick is currently with Goldman Sachs.

Liberty’s New Husband

At the end of an era there were two beautiful sisters, one named Liberty the other named Conscience. Conscience was not as strikingly beautiful as Liberty, but the little she lacked in beauty she more than made up for with intellect.

Liberty was wealthy, honest, and her incredible beauty radiated from within. She was courted by an urban cowboy who went by the name of Awesome Powers, but no-one knew who he really was. Awesome’s friends called him AP, and once Liberty and Awesome were married, Liberty called him AP too.

AP earned a modest income by clearing brush from the neighbours’ yards. However, AP appeared to have unlimited resources arising from business arrangements with his friends and his father’s connections. Besides AP’s brush clearing business, the group of friends controlled many other businesses and had all kinds of mysterious and complicated financial dealings.

Liberty thought she would live the good life with AP.

...continued

I entered a post from the worldreports.org site earlier this year on the very bizarre allegations of mega scale financial corruption in the US. See http://www.911blogger.com/node/5345

The story continues to unfold on that website that is scarely reported on, even in the alternative media on the internet. I have been amazed though at the increasing influence of readers of 911blogger.com and the 9-11 Truth movement in general.

I would like to draw people’s attention again to the latest update on that site entitled:
WANTAGATE: GRANDFATHER OF CORRUPTION SCANDALS
WORST FINANCIAL CORRUPTION CRISIS IN WORLD HISTORY

In particular lower down the page to the section on the THE 'MULTIPLE ENQUIRY' OBFUSCATION TECHNIQUE.

In this the writer Christopher Story describes the technique in the European Parliament of dealing with controversies by creating a “public enquiry” which drags on for months without making conclusions, but forms another related enquiry and then another – all of which remain “under investigation” without ever concluding anything.

A Project for the New American Citizen invites you to Rebuilding America’s Senses, a two-day conference aimed at exposing state- sponsored terrorism and its application in staged false-flag operations. By understanding these two fundamental concepts, one can better comprehend how governments have historically used fear and even terrorism as a means to control their populations. The conference will be organized around the historical and present use of state-sponsored terrorism, as well as its inevitable use in the future. It is our belief that a citizenry who is aware of such tactics will not be so easily coerced into supporting another unjustifiable war and continued degradation of their rights. By attending this free conference you will hear from a number of prestigious speakers, drawn from all over the country, provide irrefutable physical and socio-scientific proof that Western governments have indeed been behind the major terrorist events of our lives, including the attacks of September 11th, the 7/7 bombings in London, the Oklahoma City bombing and many more.

“The individual is handicapped by coming face to face with a conspiracy so monstrous, he cannot believe it exists”

- J. Edgar Hoover, FBI Director 1923-1972

Working out how to start this post was pretty hard. As I am well aware, having been in the same position myself not too long ago, the idea that 9/11 was an inside job may seem too ludicrous to be countenanced. So let me start by saying 3 things: firstly, it is an idea that is now believed by 50 % of the 9/11 victim’s families http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/july2006/080706governmentcomplicit.htm

I just came across this movie posted on Google. This half hour film is presented part in the spirit of Loose Change and part Oil, Smoke and Mirrors. It is not the best 9/11 film out there, but is a decent introduction to some of the basic issues. The first half covers the PNAC-type background, while the second half concerns the events of the day of 9/11 and its aftermath. John O'Neill gets lots of love in here. There is a bizarre DC sniper segue that I didn't understand. I think I have seen this before, but the explosion at the 21:22 minute mark is AMAZING.

http://www.jonesreport.com/articles/061006_kristol_discussion.html

One of the most watched, discussed videos raises questions of activist tactics

Aaron Dykes/ Jones Report | October 6, 2006

A large group of activists confronted PNAC chairman William Kristol during a speaking engagement at the University of Texas held Tuesday. They sought to confront him on the Project for a New American Century's odd statement published in September 2000 that their recommendations for military escalation would be difficult to achieve failing a "catastrophic and catalyzing event" such as a "new Pearl Harbor." (pg. 51, "Rebuilding America's Defenses")