PDF Scan Of Original: OurTown - Englewood FL - Dec 29th 2010
Engineer questioning 9/11
Official explanation defies basic laws of physics
By STEVE REILLY
ENGLEWOOD — Like most Americans, Jonathan Cole was shocked by the destruction of the World Trade Center towers on Sept. 11, 2001.
And like most Americans, Cole, an engineer and president of Giffels Webster Engineering, initially accepted official explanations for the towers’ destruction, but no longer.
The science doesn’t work, according to Cole, who has produced a series of simple experiments and videos that call into question the National Institute of Standards and Technology’s and other official findings on the disaster.
In late 2007, Cole began questioning all he heard when he was a sent a video of the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7. The video shows the building collapsing down on itself, much like the twin towers; however, WTC 7 wasn’t struck by an aircraft.
McCain (sounds like McDonalds doesnt it) had a rally here with about 20 people in Madrid, we (the 911truth group ) invaded and came out on tv, and press because our signs were so big they couldnt be avoided.
See us here on tv starting at minute 43 http://www.telemadrid.es/video/emision.pag?tipo=tn2
The rest of the links to articles in press (in spanish) are here:
Here is our video:
Marion Cotillard in the French Press posted 8 march 2008 and this page will be updated as information comes
I have scanned and put together ( sorry only in French) what the journalists are saying on Marion Cotillard since the last week. The included reactions of the public are very interesting. I will add to this page any new future articles as they come.
. 0) 11 Septembre: Cotillard souffle le show et l'effroi aux Etats-Unis
. 1) Le Canard enchaîné du 5 mars 2008
. 2) http://www.marianne2.fr du Vendredi 29 Février 2008 - 07:00 Bénédicte Charles ( article lu 100356 fois au 8 mars 2008 )
. 3) Charlie HEBDO mercredi 5 mars 2008
. 4) Libération Lundi le 3 mars 2008
. 5) Le Parisien , mercredi 05 mars 2008 par Guillaume Serina
. 6) L’affaire Cotillard sur "Parlons Net "
Look at the forked stick that the mainstream media find themselves in right now ? Up until now, they have been the unqustioned purveyors and vendors of Truth in America and around the world. Whether you admit it or not, the clear evidence says that they have helped the government to cover up 9/11. This knowledge is percolating into the general public consciousness, and people are beginning to turn in ever greater numbers to the internet as a more reliable form of news and Truth. This is not going unnoticed by the main news organs. That is why I say that they will sooner or later HAVE to start publishing what they know of 9/11. It's strictly a matter of their own survival. Their shareholders must be anxiously watching the DOW indexes.I think the Truth Movement should devote more time and effort in bringing pressure to bear on people like Murdoch.Hit them in the wallet, and you will see some action. Why pay for omissions and outright lies?
Legislation has been introduced by U.S. Senator David Vitter (R-LA) to require registration of bloggers with more than 500 readers. To register (in other words, ask permission to enjoin in a priviledge) and become regulated (taxation is one form of regulation) means being subject to administrative, bureaucratic control. Once registered, failure to comply then most assuredly renders one subject to government force and violence. By my posting here, and assuming the readers of 911blogger to exceed 500, then I would be required to register. I ain't gonna do it. 911blogger readers in Louisiana, it's time to call your senator out.
Actually, I see this as a good sign. This means that they are afraid, very afraid. The government, the mainstream media, the globalist elite are very afraid. However, as to be expected and just like any cornered animal, they are lashing out ferociously in their defense. This is only the beginning.... so, get ready. The full text of three articles on Vitter's bill, with links, can be found below the rest of my two-cents worth.
The conspiracy theory of 9/11
NEWSDAY REPORTER Wednesday, October 11 2006
Five years after the horrific airplane bombings of New York’s World Trade Centre (WTC) twin towers, there are questions still unanswered, as science and common sense seem to point to different explanations of the events as they unfolded.
This is explored in the controversial documentary DVD, 911: In Plane Site, directed by William Lewis and narrated by talk-radio host Dave vonKleist.
The beginning text across the screen warning that “the information we’re about to view is overwhelmingly significant”, makes the viewer sit up fully alert and expecting shocking things. And these are delivered.
There is actual photographic evidence that seems to change the official version of September 11, 2001.
The narration and dramatic intro music painfully forces the viewer to remember the first scenes after the bombings, with questions such as “Did a plane hit the Pentagon?”, quickly answered by “Photographic evidence suggests not”, “Did explosives collapse the World Trade Centre?,” “Fire fighters tell the real story.” The docu-drama even suggests that US President George W Bush may have given the world distorted facts about the events.