How can we honestly discuss science if we do not pay careful attention to logic?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logical_fallacies

Paradoxically, the logical fallacies get little attention, but they are among the most useful of tools for thinking clearly about 9/11.

For instance, the basic "appeal to unqualified authority" helps short-circuit NIST's injection of possibly false information into the debate.

A couple of videos that point out fallacies in NIST's reasoning:

Sunder on What Controlled Demolition Looks Like
http://bit.ly/Sunder_on_What_Controlled_Demolition_Looks_Like

We Have the Results and Only We Have the Results
http://bit.ly/We_Have_the_Results_and_Only_We_Have_the_Results