staged videos

U.S. Government Caught Red-Handed Releasing Staged Al-Qaeda Videos

This could be big, post your thoughts in the comments below.  If this turns out to be ironclad, we can organize a major campaign to the media and members of congress. Thanks to Boast for the scoop:

Immediate Congressional investigation demanded, media oversight of clear and deliberate psychological warfare against American population non-existent

Revelations that the US government had been in possession of footage released on Sunday depicting alleged Al-Qaeda hijackers and Osama Bin Laden since 2001 and evidence that the footage itself was filmed by security agencies, went unquestioned by the media - who blindly towed the official line that the tape was released by Al-Qaeda. This is smoking gun proof that the U.S. government is staging the release of alleged Al-Qaeda tapes and it demands an immediate Congressional investigation.

Segments of the video that were interspersed with footage of the "laughing hijackers," Jarrah and Atta, showing Bin Laden giving a speech to an audience in Afghanistan on January 8 2000, were culled from what terror experts describe as surveillance footage taken by a "security agency."

Whether wide-body jets were used is unimportant. CGI Fakery is Already Fact

Just like controlled demolitions, CGI is already fact given that...

an aluminum airplane will not slice through 100s of feet of structural steel and reinforced concrete, not show any signs of crushing, breaking, bending, and have it's delicate nose pop out the otherside. And on top of that, not have an exit hole in the building.

Also, different flight paths prove TV Fakery as well.

People must know that this technology exists and is in the hands of TV Networks, and that improvements are being made all the time.

Any news, even live news, from Iraq could all be fake!


Quotes from a Founding member of S.P.I.N.E., and retired Software Engineer in the Aerospace Industry:


"The video is phony because airliners don’t meld into steel and concrete buildings, they crash against them!"

Open Letter To Paul Joseph Watson (regarding your article on

in regards to this article


Mr Watson:

I ask that you follow Alex Jones' advice and look at the data.

You claim the fuselage of flight 175 poked through the opposite side of the south tower. If so, where is the exit hole? An exit hole is not visible in any of the photographs.

What you see on the film footage is a CGI fuselage, a "special effect".


This video shows what happens when an F4 slams into a concrete wall at 500MPH. Note that F4s are built to much higher standards than wide-body aircraft, and are designed to fly 1500MPH. You'll see the F4 pulverizes into dust.


What happens on 9/11? The flimsy wide-body "airplane" penetrates the structural steel / concrete building just as it glides through the air! Wing tips don't break off, tail doesn't bend, the "plane" doesn't even change direction. It shows no change at all.