Stu Bykofsky

FOX NEWS: We need another 9/11

Broadcasted on Fox News (August 2007), Columnist Stu Bykofsky, author of the article "To save America we need another 9/11, claims that America needs a new 9/11 to unite the American people, because they have "forgotten" who the enemy is. He also claims that "there will be another 9/11", and Fox News Anchorman concurs.

"Does this columnist have a valid point?" --- "its going to take a lot of dead people to wake people up." --- "Another attack on America is inevitable"

/M

9/11: The most overblown event in American history

Source: http://www.ocala.com/article/20070820/OPINION/208200317/1030/OPINION

Article published Aug 20, 2007

9/11: The most overblown event in American history

PAUL CAMPOS

When Stu Bykofsky, a columnist for the Philadelphia Daily News, wrote a column last week in which he openly hoped that America suffers "another 9/11," he merely had the poor judgment to say what many a right-wing politician and pundit is thinking.

Evidence for this is everywhere: in the fact that Bykofsky was invited to appear on the GOP's unofficial network, Fox News, to "explain" his comments; in the keen disappointment that ripples throughout the right-wing blogosphere every time the collapse of a bridge or a steam-pipe explosion turns out not to have been the work of Scary Brown People Who Hate Our Freedoms; and in predictions such as that made by former Sen. Rick Santorum, that the GOP's electoral fortunes will improve as soon as there's another terrorist attack.

Wishing For Another 9/11?

Source: http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_randolph_070815_wishing_for_another_.htm

OpEdNews

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
August 15, 2007

Wishing For Another 9/11?

By randyholhut

DUMMERSTON, Vt. — In last Thursday’s Philadelphia Daily News, conservative columnist Stu Bykofsky gave voice to the thought that many supporters of the so-called global war on terror are thinking right now.

Bykofsky's piece, entitled "To save America, we need another 9/11," was a lament for "how splintered we are politically — thanks mainly to our ineptitude in Iraq — that we've forgotten who the enemy is."

While he admitted that wishing for another 9/11 is "sick," Bykofsky wrote that he misses "the community of outrage and resolve" that existed after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.

My Letter to Stu Bykofsky was published!

In response to Mr. Bykofsky's scumbag comments on the necessity of 'a new 9/11".

Here's the link, second letter on the page:

http://www.philly.com/dailynews/opinion/20070814_Letters__.html

I am sure that this e-mail is not the first you've received in reply to your little article calling for a new 9/11 so Americans will get behind Dick Cheney's war crimes. Surely you understand that 9/11 was facilitated not by Muslim fanatic religious extremists, but by the CIA and criminal elements at the highest levels of the American government. Osama bin Laden did not issue the NORAD standdown, disallowing the scrambling of fighter jets to shoot down the supposedly hijacked planes, nor did Mohammed Atta order the demolition of WTC 7. Terrorism by nature is political manipulation. Calling for murderous atrocities on American soil a la 9/11 is an act of terrorism in and of itself. How shameful of you to call for war crimes against humanity.

Jason Jensen

Philadelphia

FOX News Supports Stu Bykofsky & Desires Another 9/11 Terrorist Attack

It should come as no surprise that Fox News has come to the support of Stu Bykofsky and his article, which essentially calls for another 9/11 attack in order to justify Bush's policies and unite Americans.
John Gibson....actually says.... “I think it’s going to take a lot of dead people to wake America up.”

In case video doesn't plug, here's the link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mAoVkD_0sVM

9/11 As A Benefit

You may have heard that Philadelphia Daily News columnist Stu Bykofsky recently wrote that a new 9/11 is what we need in order to re-unify this country.

I think what's interesting about his assertion is that he is willing to have 1000's of people murdered because it would be beneficial in his eyes.

How much different is that than what we are saying with regard to the Bush Administration and the first 9/11 (and hopefully the last)? Is it such a stretch to say that the Bush Administration was willing to have 1000's of people murdered because it was beneficial to them in that it allowed them to invade two countries illegally, it gave them unprecedented powers that go against the Constitution of the United States, it has given billions of dollars to their corporate friends, and it has given them "carte blanche" for policies that do not benefit the people, but instead the Military Industrial Complex? No, it isn't.

To save America, we need another 9/11

Uh no ... in order to save America, we need to expose the secret history of false flag attacks, including 9/11.

The Philadelphia Daily News has this incredibly moronic piece.

ONE MONTH from The Anniversary, I'm thinking another 9/11 would help America.

What kind of a sick bastard would write such a thing?

A bastard so sick of how splintered we are politically - thanks mainly to our ineptitude in Iraq - that we have forgotten who the enemy is.

It is not Bush and it is not Hillary and it is not Daily Kos or Bill O'Reilly or Giuliani or Barack. It is global terrorists who use Islam to justify their hideous sins, including blowing up women and children.

Iraq has fractured the U.S. into jigsaw pieces of competing interests that encourage our enemies. We are deeply divided and division is weakness.

Most Americans today believe Iraq was a mistake. Why?

Not because Americans are "anti-war."