World Trade Center
"Inside 9/11" is an Emmy winning documentary made by the National Geographic Channel. The film goes through the events of 9/11 chronologically.
Even though the film itself is two hours long, it doesn't mention Building 7 even once, as you'll see in this video clip.
Direct link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YCOVVl6e2Lc
The program doesn't bother to mention either the collapse or the building itself. Instead it skips straight from the North Tower collapse (10:30 AM) to 8:30 PM.
It seems just like the 9/11 Commission Report, Building 7 fails to turn up.
You can view the whole film below:
Report Of WTC Collapse Cover-Up Justifies Call For New Inquiry
Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth experts demand questions answered
Paul Joseph Watson
Wednesday, March 26, 2008
Richard Gage AIA, the founder of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, and hundreds of other industry experts' call for a new investigation into the collapse of the WTC twin towers and Building 7 is gaining strength following revelations of falsification and cover-up in relation to the FEMA-funded inquiry into the destruction of the buildings on 9/11.
By Stephen Demetriou: The significance of molten metal in the basements of three completely separate, distinct collapse events...?
What can be learned from the demolition of the 41-story building (The Bankers Trust or the Deutsche Bank Building) adjacent to the WTC towers?
Perhaps this how B7 would have been taken down, had it not been demolished on 9/11/01.
Questions about this demolition remain. Why are there now lawsuits? Why was there a fire during the work? What is the mystery about the company selected to be involved in the demolition, which now no longer exists? Or are these events just 'all in a day's work' in New York City with it's corruption and scandals? What was the full extent of the body parts discovered there?
Here are a few parapgraphs from one story:
First 9/11 Flyer Ever Created, Posted in Harvard U. 9/12/01 Emailed from Harvard Business School to Mainstream Media Outlets
********** First 9/11 Flyer, Posted in Harvard Yard 9/12/2001***********
THE U.S. GOVERNMENT IS THE 9/11 TERRORIST
WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DEVASTATION OF
THE WORLD TRADE CENTER & THE PENTAGON?!!!
EXAMINE THE EVIDENCE!
U.S. Air Force General Richard B. Meyers says regarding the terrorists attacks,
“ . . . It’s coming from the inside.” (Boston Globe)
WHY THE DELAY? NORAD receives 10 minutes advance notice,
But, waits over an hour to respond?
OUR OWN CIA: has been financing Saudi born, Osama bin Laden,
formerly, Tim Osmond, in covert operations since 1979.
CNN IS FRAUDULENTLY BROADCASTING: Dated 1991 footage!
of Palestinians celebrating the invasion of Kuwait, and portraying these images as current Palestinian scenes celebrating the recent devastation in New York and Washington D.C.
WHAT IS THE U.S. GOVERNMENT’S MOTIVE?
· ERODE PUBLIC CONFIDENCE IN U.S. MILITARY & FINANCIAL STRENGTH
· ESCALATE CONFLICT TO Get CITIZENS TO DEMAND U.N. PROTECTION
· LEADING TO GLOBALIZATION, A ONE WORLD ARMY,
· ONE WORLD DICTATORSHIP : GOVERNMENT BY THE FEW
STUDENTS, REMEMBER VIETNAM?
PROTEST U.S. GOVERNMENT TERRORISM NOW!
As the two entries from the Complete 9/11 Timeline copied below show, several witnesses have recalled seeing large fireballs coming from the bases of each of the Twin Towers when they collapsed on September 11, 2001. From their descriptions, it seems the fireballs erupted at the time the collapses began, or just before.
These accounts are important evidence, strongly refuting official explanations of why the World Trade Center fell. In its final report on the collapses of the Twin Towers, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) claimed the collapses "initiated at the fire and impact floors," and "progressed from the initiating floors downward." This would mean the collapse began, in the case of the South Tower, around the 78th to 84th floors, and for the North Tower, around the 93rd to 98th floors.
9/11 Responder Buried After Battle With Cancer
POSTED: 4:10 pm EST December 1, 2007
UPDATED: 6:40 pm EST December 1, 2007
NEW YORK -- An emergency medical service lieutenant with the New York Fire Department was laid to rest Saturday, and his colleagues say his death stems from toxic dust he inhaled at the World Trade Center site.
Lt. Brian Ellicott arrived at the World Trade Center site on the night of September 11th, 2001, and logged more than 100 hours working to clear the site and search for survivors, the Uniformed EMS Officers Union said.
Ellicott, 45, died Tuesday at Staten Island University Hospital after a three-month battle with non-Hodgkins lymphoma, officials said.
He left behind a wife and two kids.
Colleagues said the city has denied requests to classify Ellicott's death as in the line of duty, which would increase the benefits his family would receive.
The FDNY said it will do everything it can to support his family's application for benefits from the state Workers' Compensation Board.
Colleagues also want Ellicott listed as a casualty of 9/11.
Kids' respiratory problems blamed on 9/11 dust
BY KARLA SCHUSTER
November 29, 2007
Children exposed to World Trade Center dust are at much higher risk for respiratory problems, and in some cases are twice as likely as their peers to develop asthma, according to a city Health Department survey released yesterday.
The survey of the 3,100 children who are enrolled in the city's World Trade Center Health Registry found that being caught in the dust cloud in the immediate aftermath of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attack was the single biggest risk factor in developing respiratory problems.
Half of all children enrolled in the registry developed a new or worsening breathing problem. But those who were caught in the massive dust plume were diagnosed with asthma at double the rate of those who were not.
6 years to build - 12 seconds to destroy
417 meters tall - 63,5 meters wide
When the World Trade Center towers were demolished they took the path of most resistance - straight down. Trough their own concrete and steel structures - in approximately 12 seconds.
You can time it yourself with the clock in the bottom of the screen.
Note the way hundreds of thousand tons of concrete and massive steel beams are being thrown like confetti more than 100 meters to the sides and up in an arch away from the tower, as it evidently explodes!
Or do you still believe it "collapsed"?
Many more videos of the so called collapses can be found in the link below
Posted: Monday, October 22, 2007
3D Visualization of World Trade Center
This video illustrates the efforts of Nathan Evans a Visual Effects and Animation artist to produce a high fidelity visualization of World Trade Center 1 and 2. Showing steel core columns, wiring, ventilation, office furniture, restrooms, concrete, glass, secondary steel columns, office walls and other building content. Keep in mind do to the size of the building it would be impossible to show all the content in these building do to resolution of video and available of processing power that my computer will allow at the present.
In this video it will help you understand visually what the building's content was in wtc1 and 2.
The render is based off the blueprints of floor 47-the noticeable differences of each floor from the blueprints would be the center positioning of the stairs and specific spacing of restrooms and the walls of storage space.
Verisimilitude: 1 : having the appearance of truth : PROBABLE
2 : depicting realism (as in art or literature)
Here is my breakdown of what I hoped to do with this collection of films...
digg_url = 'http://digg.com/world_news/USA_Leading_Collapse_Expert_Thought_WTC2_Was_Brought_Down_With_Explosives';
Right after the first World Trade Center tower collapsed, at 9:59 a.m. on September 11, 2001, Father John Delendick--one of New York Fire Department's chaplains--ran down a ramp to below the nearby World Financial Center, so as to escape the dust cloud. There he met with Deputy Chief Ray Downey, the head of the FDNY's Special Operations Command. Delendick asked Downey if the jet fuel from the plane had blown up, thus causing the South Tower to collapse. According to Delendick, Downey "said at that point he thought there were bombs up there because it was too even." 
Nick Clegg, Ian Hodgson and Calvin Butcher
are organising the meeting at Oxford Town Hall
9/11 meeting sparks town hall row
An event at Oxford Town Hall marking the anniversary of the 9/11 terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center in New York has been criticised as insensitive to victims.
But Oxford City Council has defended its policy of not censoring events staged at the venue.
Films will be shown supporting conspiracy theories about the atrocity, including suggestions that the US government could itself have been behind the attack.
The event has been organised by the Oxford 9/11 Truth Group, formed two years ago by office administrator Ian Hodgson to press for a new investigation into what happened.
On Tuesday, the sixth anniversary of the atrocity, he will show a number of films which he claims will open the public's eyes to the reality of twin towers' destruction.
This is a brief look at a few misleading illustrations, including figures 2-1 & 2-2 from FEMA's World Trade Center Building Performance Study, and NOVA's illustration of the WTC core.
Each of the images below depicts a cross-section of one of the Twin Towers, using a 512x512 pixel image as a scale basis for the creation of the 47 core columns at the center of each tower.
These models were created in Second Life.
First, FEMA 403 fig. 2-2, (Representative structural framing plan, upper floors), in which the core columns are depicted by red dots.
These dots are identical in size and placement to the depiction of core columns in fig. 2-1 (a structural framing plan representative of an upper floor in the towers).
Was it really collapses we saw on TV september 11 2001?
Was it really because of the planes impact and the following fires that World Trade Center 1, 2 & 7 came to the ground?
Or did they in fact explode from top to bottom?
It all happaned very fast.
The Twin Towers were 417 meters tall - 63,5 x 63,5 meters wide - and were more or less pulverized in approximately 12 seconds.
Critics of the official account claim this is equivalent to free fall speed. That would mean zero(0) restistance from the buildings own steel and concrete structure on the way down. Zero.
But the Twin Towers were supported by a core of 47 massive steel beams and 236 on the outer sides.
Could really this fast and total demolition be possible without some kind of explosives?