OK. WTC7 collapsed on the afternoon of 9/11. the FEMA report suggests that the building fell from fires, but does not come to any specific conclusion. WTC7 has never since been mentioned by almost any media, and is not mentioned a single time in the 911 'independent' investigation. WTC7 is a major smoking gun of 9/11. you should research it and understand what caused it to fall, and why 'they' would want it to fall.

here is all you need to know:

1) no steel based structure has ever fallen due to fire. you can verify this in fire engineering monthly, do some research on the editor in cheif of that magazine who is adamant that the gov't prevented a real investigation. on 9/11 three steel buildings collapsed 'from fire', 2 were hit by planes, 1 was barely hit by any debris, that building was building 7 (WTC7).. sure there was some debris damage, but nothing like WTC6 and WTC5 and other buildings much closer.

examples of major steel building fires (which did not fall):
caracas skyscraper fire, gutted 16 floors, reached 26 floors, burned for 17 hours
One Meridian Plaza in Philadelphia, raged for 18 hours, gutted 8 floors
madrid fire 1 2


sample pictures of the WTC7 fire:
burned for a few hours on a specific few floors
pic 1
pic 2

2) fire does not burn hot enough to melt steel (think of the eyes on your stove, the grills you set firewood logs on, etc.) if the theory is that minor fires caused the building to fall then does a freefall collapse sound reasonable? the building fell VERY fast for a building which in theory was falling due to fire causing steel to melt. keep in mind the fires were in specific spots.

videos of the collapse (you may need to right-click and choose 'save as'):
video 1
video 2

3) just prior to WTC7 falling many were being told WTC7 was about to fall. it had been reported as on fire approximately 1-2 hours prior. people were told the building was about to fall even though there was no evidence it was unstable, and no historical data to suggest it was even possible..

here are sample videos of people saying the building was about to come down:
hard hat
news report

4) the head lease owner said in a PBS documentary that they decided to 'pull' the building:
larry silverstein

what does this look like:
close up with good contrast

question:
if the lease owner says it was 'pulled' (controlled demolition).. the video evidence shows it was a controlled demolition.. people were told the buildings were about to collapse and to stay away.. and the fires could not have made the building fall in that manner according to physical evidence and all of world history.. then did WTC7 fall from controlled demolition?

bonus question:
what pulverizes concrete into a fine mist floors below the 'collapse'?

look at this, and start some research into 9/11! everyone said they would never forget, but it seems very few are actually paying attention to the hundreds and hundreds of coincidences and unanswered questions. read the new 911truth press statement, and sign the justicefor911 petition:
http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20041026093059633

please visit wtc7.net for more information about WTC7.

EDIT: on a side note, a worker at ground zero admitted today he helped recover 3 of the 4 black boxes from the towers attack.. the official story says they were never recovered..

http://www.pnionline.com/dnblog/extra/archives/001139.html