Update: 9-4-07 -- For sake of clarity, the Kennebunkport Warning was sent in to 911blogger from author Webster Griffin Tarpley. This Warning is a product of the activities undertaken by Three of the signatories listed below, McKinney, Hill and Tarpley, did not physically sign the document. According to Bruce Marshall, he received official permission to include McKinney's name, verbally. A PDF at lists "apparent denial or subsequent retraction of signature".


To the American people, and to peace loving individuals everywhere:

Massive evidence has come to our attention which shows that the backers, controllers, and allies of Vice President Dick Cheney are determined to orchestrate and manufacture a new 9/11 terror incident, and/or a new Gulf of Tonkin war provocation over the coming weeks and months. Such events would be used by the Bush administration as a pretext for launching an aggressive war against Iran, quite possibly with nuclear weapons, and for imposing a regime of martial law here in the United States. We call on the House of Representatives to proceed immediately to the impeachment of Cheney, as an urgent measure for avoiding a wider and more catastrophic war. Once impeachment has begun, it will be easier for loyal and patriotic military officers to refuse illegal orders coming from the Cheney faction. We solemnly warn the people of the world that any terrorist attack with weapons of mass destruction taking place inside the United States or elsewhere in the immediate future must be considered the prima facie responsibility of the Cheney faction. We urge responsible political leaders everywhere to begin at once to inoculate the public opinion of their countries against such a threatened false flag terror operation.

(Signed) A Group of US Opposition Political Leaders Gathered in Protest at the Bush Compound in Kennebunkport, Maine, August 24-25, 2007












* These four signatories have released a statement indicating that the Kennebunkport Warning was "altered" after they signed it. Bruce Marshall, who gathered the signatures, remains adamant that the signatures are authentic, the document has not been altered, and has offered photographic evidence to substantiate his claims.

** (This is not John Kaminski, author of "America's Autopsy Report", etc. Here is some of the Lawyer, John Kaminski's work: Impeachment: We’ve Got a Job to Do).


Ok he is from University of

Ok he is from University of Wisconsin Madison too?
11/11 Never Forget - Fetzer Flips

What is a "pos"?

"Tricks and treachery are the practice of fools, that don't have brains enough to be honest." - Benjamin Franklin

Piece of...

Barrett and you...

Looks like Barrett is giving him the benefit of the doubt. The RBN archive you link to seems to be dead. I heard that show and Kaminski sounded like bad news to me.

I'm passing this on to Marshall, Tarpley and Hill.


Didn't elaborate as to who's text is who's in that doc. This is me:

In this regard, I agree with you. America is currently involved in, and supporting a Holocaust against Muslims. In regards to Israel using the Holocaust to obtain a blank check, I agree with you. In regards to the Nazis not doing what we were told [they did], I wholeheartedly disagree.


Take my word for it Kevin, they did everything we were told. I've met family members with numbers burned into their arms, and have heard the experiences first hand. I don't understand the mindset of people trying to uncover whether or not the Nazis did as we were told. Weren't as bad as we were told.


People want to incorporate the Holocaust into the movement? Ok, let's compare the Reichstag fire ultimately giving Hitler the ability to perform the Holocaust to 9/11 ultimately giving Bush the ability to murder 655,000 Muslims living in Iraq, etc...


I do not believe Eric William's, Eric Hufschmid's, Christopher Bollyn's, etc... "work" should be apart of the 9/11 Truth Movement.

Donate To 9/11 First Responders

It's a different guy.


I apologize to the other Kaminski.

Donate To 9/11 First Responders

More Warning Signs

-Micheal Chertoff-New AG
-Billions in Put Options purchased betting that the market will crash by 9-21 by 30-50%??!
-Members of the 1st Battalion 265 Air Defense Artillery have mobilized and are on a plane headed first to Ft. Bliss, then for federal active duty in the capital region.The troops will be deployed for a year.

Can you tell me

where this information comes from? I'd like to read more, especially on the troop deployment.


This appears to be a credible link to the troop deployment:


Not sure where Leo got the info but I read the same here.
I can't vouch for the actual source. Make up your own mind.
All the same, it is ominous.

Very telling info

Leo, thanks for posting this. The put options info is especially interesting. Follow the money, always -- It will lead to the perps.
How did you come across these alerts?


I have been reading about the put options for a few days now. The American investor that supposedly placed the option has not been verified as of yet, and there are some claims that it is bogus:

But, a European investor definitely bet some big bucks recently:


Both of those links were about the European investor. I read about the American investor here at the prison planet Armageddon site, but now I can't locate the actual statements.

Personally, I don't view the Gonzales/Rove step down as a good thing. This is a great time for them to distance themselves from any culpability in the next attack. I have been watching Condi's schedule, and so far she has remained in D.C. for the month of August. Anyone know when her "vacation" is? When she leaves, all hell will break loose since all the major players are now out of town. I'm certain the Neocon terrorists plan on taking down D.C., our center of so-called freedom, and it appears that it will be happening very soon.

Condi may not be safe

Don't get your hopes up about Condi's schedule as a good clue to a target date.

She has been mentioned as putting a lot of old-school diplomatic professionals in charge of various posts in the Middle East lately. In other words, she may be working with the "grown-ups" faction by now, so the Cheney faction may find her more useful if she makes an "Elvis-based career-move."

As for Gonzales/Rove, this doesn't just distance them from culpability, it gets them out of the blast-zone, hot-zone, whatever. Rove's resignation was announced in advance, anyway. Their announcements could amount to nothing more than a couple of bones thrown our way to distract from the real action. This admin probably doesn't care what it announces at this point, since they can plan to take it all back after the attack. After all, major staff changes wouldn't be appropriate at such a critical time, right?

I'm guessing anything in Washington would probably be dirty-bomb oriented, not a big nuke blast. (Could be wrong...) why? If the Fed bureaucracy & military, even the survivors outside of Washington, were to think about it for a half-second, they might decide to fully & literally revolt, since a blast might unleash the last reservation about full-scale resistance. If you've just seen the junta take out thousands of your compatriots, why both with loyalty on any level? Also, the psychological impact of seeing the Mall, Capitol Building, etc as mere smoking craters might undo the last bit of psychological reserve for many who have kept their doubts under their hats till now. Falling towers let us know we were "in a new kind of war"; a fully-nuked Washington could convince an unexpectedly large fraction of the population there is no Federal Government in charge of anything anymore, just fifty states on their own.

This could easily get out of hand in several different directions, since these boys don't seem to understand how differing groups in differing parts of the country percieve Washington. The South could rise again, the West could see a revival of the militias from the Sagebrush Rebellion days in the 1990's, populations in other regions could talk with Mexico and Canada... all sorts of folks could go "off-script" without realizing they aren't following Cheney's "main" script, like they're supposed to. Their biggest mistake could be thinking there would be only one "opposition" to deal with. Oh, no... we could only oppose something that's still there. But if the real Washington is gone... how can you disobey what's no longer there? It's not "the" opposition they would have to worry about, but a dozen survivors and inheritors of the True Constitutional tradition. Remember how many successors Rome had? Byzantium, the Franks and Germans, the Russians, they all considered themselves the true "Romans".

There's no particular reason they should count on anyone who's actually playing along with them right now during the setup. They might consider it logistically and organizationally easier to let Cheneybushco to pull their trick, then take 'em out afterwards in the confusion.

A dirty-bomb (or several) could allow enough infrastructure and personnel to continue to function, while allowing the implied threat of letting the hammer drop one more time, this time harder and on those who make themselves visible. The moment any bully or abuser obviously lets you have it everything, that's the moment when they expose themselves. That's the moment when you finally get to see what it's like to get everything they've got, and if you're still alive, there's no more reason to dread their worst.

Brinksmanship cuts both ways.

I am not sure

that I agree with each point. But overall, your analysis is at least plausible. There are others that probably are as well. But you among those first to postulate what may come down. Other scenarios come from the Peak Oil folks, global warming folks etc. But few talk about what could occur given various false flag ops. I really don't want to find out en vivo. But something evil slouches towards us. Though not as much as we were.... we are -still- behind the curve on this.....

my heart sunk when i heard

my heart sunk when i heard Chertoff's name being thrown around as the possible new AG. not a good sign at all.

"The Central Intelligence Agency owns everyone of any significance in the major media." ~ William Colby, Former Director, CIA

Original source

Where's the "official" website for this declaration?

Sent via email to us and others.


Several people signing the statement are involved with;

The Warning is posted there as well.

Cheney is an extremely dangerous psychopath who needs to

be impeached & incarcerated immediately!

"Massive Evidence"

"Massive evidence has come to our attention which shows that the backers, controllers, and allies of Vice President Dick Cheney are determined to orchestrate and manufacture a new 9/11 terror incident, and/or a new Gulf of Tonkin war provocation over the coming weeks and months."

See some of the evidence here:

The Next 9/11? Predictions, Propaganda, Motive, and After the Attack

Digg it here:

Although the Warning in my opinion has merit, there is considerable controversy over the signatures and the divisive language coming from the promoters of the warning. See:

Can we itemize the Massive Evidence?

There are high-profile names here, and the message is important. However, without including the evidence that's mentioned in the first sentence, I'm afraid it will sound paranoid and alarmist to those who aren't already worried about another false flag event from Cheney's crew.

Escalation of anti-aircraft artillery in Washington?

The troop deployment to D.C. was reported on an Orlando television station on August 22. You can read the article here:

Hillary Clinton may know something's up

as well.

A couple days ago she said that if there was another attack before Bush leaves office, it would help the GOP, but SHE would be the only Dem who could still win in 2008. It could be her trying to float that meme before the next attack happens.

Also, Newsweek is putting Bin Laden

Front and center this week with a big 10 page cover story titled, "He's still out there".

Well then, every Newsweek reader should see this then....

Just to see Porter Goss pitifully failing in his attempt to stifle a giggle at Bush's lies about going after OBL.

Newsweek: what complete propagandistic bullshit.....another indication of a coming false-flag attack.....

Also, video of Aaron Russo describing how Nick Rockefeller mocked how people would, in the next year, be looking in caves for some non-existent boogeyman, is apros-po ....

9/11 Truth ends the 9/11 Wars

Here are the links

I posted earlier today with the initial info. It seems there may be legitimate reasons for the trades?? I prefer to err on the side of caution.

This is the site regarding the troop deployment. Again, it could be a standard rotation...??

Ofcourse we all know appearances can be deceiving...


"There are 65,000 contracts @ $750.00 for the SPX 700 calls for open interest. That controls 6.5 million shares at $750 = $4.5 Billion. Not a single trade . But quite a bit of $$ on a contract that is 700 points away from current value. No one would buy that deep in the money calls. No reason to. So if they were sold looks like someone betting on massive dislocation. Lots of very strange option activity that I haven't seen before. I've been doing this about 25 years."

Could someone who is investment-wise go through this and sum his/her conclusions up in plain language?

What pray tell is this massive evidence?

I don't doubt this evidence exists. But they have an obligation to tell us. Especially for the statement to be taken seriously (the kind of seriousness it deserves) by people not in the 9/11 Truth Movement. Is it the information of the past few months that most of us are aware of? Or is it something more concrete? The statement should include at least a brief overview of the nature of the evidence.

"Once the collapse initiated, the video evidence is rather clear. It was not stopped by the floors below. So there was no calculation that we did to demonstrate what is clear from the videos."
-John Gross, National Institute of Scientific Treason

i agree 100%

I don't doubt the validity of their concerns but what exactly is this "massive evidence" to which they refer?
With all due respect and gratitude, to me it seems slightly foolish to make such a pronouncement without including at least some of the evidence which is so "massive".

Just in case

Everybody get film & new batteries in your video cameras. If this event happens, we wanna document it as much as possible.

I have trouble believing Ann Wright "signed" that

That does not sound like something she would do.

The "document" they have on their site is just an MS Word document with the text and no signatures.

I want to see a scanned document WITH signatures.

Until then this is a bunch of B.S.!

Senior 9/11 Bureau Chief, Analyst, Correspondent, Principle Investigator, Forensic 9/11ologist

Secrecy is the beginning of tyranny. — Robert Heinlein


9/11ologist ? Did you make that one up yourself? :-)

It would become so obvious if they

purposefully misled regarding -any- signatures that I am sure they would not consider it. Thus, your vehement concern is?

Why the title "Kennebunkport Warning"??

It doesn't seem appropriate, and it does seem misleading regarding the importance /topic of the post.

Glad you shared it though!! We need people to be so vigilant about covering every move of these sick bastards.


Dahlia Wasfi

DID NOT sign this. There is something rotten in Denmark. Dahlia's response to news of this document:

Hey Michael--

I didn't sign this.

I don't know about the validity of this "warning," but the people who put this list together were dishonest about signatories. They took our signatures for something else and put it on this. Very weird.

Love, Dahlia

This brings everything about this document into question.

Whomever did this...

Is scum. Absolute scum. This should be taken down immediately, and a statement issued regarding it.

Who wrote this warning? Who was the one responsible for obtaining signatures? I know who was responsible for supplying the "evidence" behind the claims, and who is also a signatory.

Donate To 9/11 First Responders

Can this be corroborated?

I asked about the odd title above, but the short list of signatories was a red flag, as was the brevity of the statement. As JG said, this should be taken down and replaced by an analysis of why this disinfo ever saw the light of day.

Keeping track