Albright Agrees with Biden: Terrorists Will Test Obama
Albright Agrees with Biden: Terrorists Will Test Obama
Former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright agrees with Sen. Biden that it is a 'statement of fact' that terrorists will test Sen. Obama within first six months of his presidency. October 21, 2008.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WD_EAe1N9-M
Biden to Supporters: "Gird Your Loins", For the Next President "It's Like Cleaning Augean Stables"
October 20, 2008 7:35 AM
ABC News' Matthew Jaffe Reports: Sen. Joe Biden, D-Del., on Sunday guaranteed that if elected, Sen. Barack Obama., D-Ill., will be tested by an international crisis within his first six months in power and he will need supporters to stand by him as he makes tough, and possibly unpopular, decisions.
http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/2008/10/biden-to-suppor.html
- constitutional911's blog
- Login to post comments
What Will Obama’s “International Crisis” Be?
http://www.infowars.com/?p=5465
What Will Obama’s “International Crisis” Be?
Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
Wednesday, October 22, 2008
Joe Biden’s “guarantee” that an “international crisis” will unfold shortly after President Obama takes office conjures up several different possibilities, but it seems the likely outcome will revolve around an announcement that Iran has developed a nuclear bomb, prompting a potential military attack.
“It will not be six months before the world tests Barack Obama like they did John Kennedy,” Biden told an audience in Seattle this past weekend.
“Remember I said it standing here if you don’t remember anything else I said. Watch, we’re gonna have an international crisis, a generated crisis, to test the mettle of this guy.”
The assured tone with which Biden delivered his forecast was staggeringly convincing, and left the observer in no doubt that there will be a major world crisis shortly after Obama takes office. “Mark my words, mark my words,” Biden stressed, adding that “tough” and “unpopular” foreign policy decisions will have to be made.
“I promise you it will occur,” Biden added, “As a student of history and having served with seven presidents, I guarantee you it is going to happen.”
Biden’s use of the word “generated” is even more startling. One of the dictionary definitions we find for the word “generated” is “to bring into existence; cause to be; produce,” which begs the question, will this be another staged and manufactured crisis like the 9/11 attacks, which occurred less than 8 months after Bush took office?
Or will it be something even more serious, a nuclear conflagration involving Russia or Iran?
John McCain raised the specter of nuclear war yesterday when he warned that the United States faces “many challenges here at home, and many enemies abroad in this dangerous world,” before mentioning the 1962 Cuban Missile crisis.
Echoing Biden’s comments, McCain said the next president “won’t have time to get used to the office” and “I know how close we came to a nuclear war and I will not be a president that needs to be tested. I have been tested. Senator Obama has not.”
What is the test to which McCain and Biden refer, and how can they be so sure that it will arrive shortly after Obama takes office should he win the election as expected? What was Colin Powell referring to on Meet The Press when he said, “There’s going to be a crisis which will come along on the 21st, 22nd of January that we don’t even know about right now.”
The most likely scenario seems to revolve around Iran announcing, or the U.S. government claiming, that they are ready to build their first nuclear bomb.
* A d v e r t i s e m e n t
* Jason Bermas Combo
Indeed, the Mossad front news outlet Debka File reported yesterday that “Iran will be ready to build its first bomb just one month after the next US president is sworn in.” The very next sentence of the report ties this in with Biden’s promise of an international crisis immediately after Obama takes office.
“DEBKAfile’s military sources cite the new US timeline: By late January, 2009, Iran will have accumulated enough low-grade enriched uranium (up to 5%) for its “break-out” to weapons grade (90%) material within a short time. For this, the Iranians have achieved the necessary technology. In February, they can move on to start building their first nuclear bomb,” according to the report.
Of course, the legitimacy of these claims are likely to be completely fabricated - the official U.S. National Intelligence Estimate concluded in December that Iran had suspended its nuclear weapons campaign in late 2003 - but the Israelis may be laying the groundwork for a propaganda offensive similar to the “weapons of mass destruction” scam that preceded the invasion of Iraq.
Will the military assault on Iran occur not under the highly unpopular Bush administration, as many had predicted, but under an Obama presidency? Riding into office on a wave of popular approval and support, Obama will have the political capital to get the country behind the attack if the threat of imminent danger is cited - or at least stand by and allow Israel to do the dirty work.
Will a nuclear flash point on the scale of the Cuban Missile Crisis turn out to be the “international crisis” that Biden so vehemently promised? Or will the event take on a different characteristic.
Bush exploited 9/11 to realize the pre-set agenda of his Neo-Con masters months after he was inaugurated and Bill Clinton seized upon the Oklahoma City Bombing shortly into his second term to expand federal power. What will Obama’s crisis be that enables him to offer his contribution to building the American police state?
- A terror attack, or a series of attacks, on major American cities, possibly involving crudely designed nuclear bombs or dirty bombs?
- A complete economic collapse and a new great depression leading to food riots and the imposition of martial law?
- A military showdown with Russia should Russia attempt to invade Georgia or another pro-U.S. Russian satellite country?
- A nuclear showdown with Russia should Russia start a nuclear war with Ukraine, as has been threatened?
- The necessity for another military attack on Afghanistan should the Taliban continue to regain control of the country?
- A confrontation with Venezuela should it be revealed that Hugo Chavez is receiving nuclear bomb technology from Russia or Iran?
- A new escalation in the Middle East should Israel deploy its nuclear arsenal to attack Iran, Syria Lebanon, or even Egypt?
Whatever the new “international crisis” that we have been guaranteed turns out to be, you can bet your bottom dollar that the response to it will ultimately lead to more carnage and a further assault on the fast-disappearing freedoms that we still enjoy - and in that sense under an Obama presidency, the more things “change,” the more they will stay the same.
Statement of fact?
Facts can be proven, so Obama, Biden and Albright owe it to the American public to explain why they are so sure -- and explain it now. The lame questions on CNN are typical of what we get out of the press. Am I the only one who thinks it strange that Biden is "unsure" about where the crisis will emerge, yet positive that Obama's decision will be unpopular? How the f#%k can he be so sure (because he knows that their agenda will cause the "crisis" and how unpopular it will be somewhere in the world)? IMO this will not be a case of reacting to an unexpected crisis from outside, but a case of preordained decisions by the ruling elite that will be unpopular around the world, causing a hostile reaction that will be portrayed as aggression against America. Same old shit -- a false flag event in one form or another.
This is a point of critical mass in world politics and 9/11 truth needs to be pushed even harder and our arguments made even more salient regarding international political posturing. The recent posts here about ACLU, Naomi Wolf, etc. should give us some hope that we have allies all around us, even if they can't swallow the entire 9/11 pill. We need some unity, folks, and we need "numbers." Biden has declared that Obama might/will make decisions that are against the will of the people and he is already trying to justify it. Building bridges and alliances has never been more important. People across the country are waking up to the tyranny all around us and in the White House, whomever gets elected. The only "fact" is that Obama or McCain will be the next president. Putting down either of them serves no purpose. Holding them accountable, beginning YESTERDAY, is what we need to be about. It's time to make our list of demands for the next president, whomever that may be, and have them delivered before he takes his oath of office.
It sure sounds
to me like more fear tactics.
Unpopular decisions?
Like deciding to bail out the billionaires who caused the financial crisis while letting the rest of us twist in the winds of impending depression.
That was unpopular, but they did it anyway.
Like deploying a brigade of American soldiers here in the US to put down unruly citizens.
That was unpopular, but they did it anyway.
Like voting for retroactive telecom immunity and signing off on the new FISA.
That was extremely unpopular, but they did it anyway.
The US government is supposed to serve the people. It does not. The US government serves the power elite.
Whatever happens, be it a false flag terror event, riots after a stolen election, a war with Iran started by Israel, a total economic meltdown, an assassination or anything else, you can bet your ass that it will benefit the power elite and will take away more of our remaining freedoms.
I would like to know how many billionaires have died due to a terrorist act. Do you ever wonder why the terrorists don't attack the neighborhoods of the ultra-wealthy? If the terror threats were real, why wouldn't they target those who have real influence on the policies of the US government? Why wouldn't they target those who epitomize the conspicuous consumption and greed that they claim to despise? The masses don't influence policy. With the exception of a damn few, the representatives, senators and those in the White House don't give a flying fuck what the masses think anymore. See above. Since we as masses have zero influence on policy, why would a terrorist target the masses? Food for thought.
The fact is, the terror war is bullshit. It is a vehicle used to carry out the agenda of the power elite.
I agree with the above comment. Biden needs to elaborate on why he has such confidence that this "mettle test" is inevitable and why he has such confidence on the timing of this "test".
A Generated Crisis
His expression "a generated crisis" struck me. Is Biden some sort of conspiracy theorist?
Another Conspiracy Nut?
Here's the Meet the Press interview where Colin Powell makes the ominously specific prediction: "there's going to be a crisis come along on the 21st or 22nd January that we don't even know about right now". Typically the "journalist" is totally incurious about the statement.
Does anybody get it?
Why would the terrorists (Islamofascists) want to test us? It has absolutely no benefit to them whatsoever.
not one car bomb has gone off here in the US.... the only danger we face is from the bastards in our government as well as those who profit from war and our security.
___________________
Together in Truth!
" the only danger we face is
" the only danger we face is from the bastards in our government as well as those who profit from war and our security."
Well said.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The CONSTITUTION is NOT going to "collapse" into pulverized dust no matter how much thermate/explosives or planes they throw at it
As I see it
Biden slips up. States what he honestly thinks, JFK like problem will face Obama. - That only means one thing to me. Biden stated that someone would assassinate Obama.
Powell comes out later and says, "No, what is really going to happen is going to be on a specific date"
Now Albright is saying, "No, what is really going to happen is a 'terrorist event'".
All of this is cover due to the audio equipment that recorded what Biden said.
I think the real news story here is to look for cameras to be banned from the next speaking events. Look for visual clues aimed at the speakers to remind them if the event is public or non-public.
The real story is in Biden's original comment. I wouldn't put it past "them" to actually commit a crime to cover for Biden's slip up.
Remember WTC attack - 1st and 2nd
WTC 1st attack 1993 - 1st year Bill Clinton
WTC 2nd attack 2001 - 1st year George W Bush
What holds for the future of 2009 awaiting the next president?
An Obama assassination is a possibility, remember his security detail stand down of recent months?