Fifty questions on 9/11 By Pepe Escobar ASIA TIMES 9/11/09

http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/KI11Ak02.html

THE ROVING EYE
Fifty questions on 9/11
By Pepe Escobar

It's September 11 all over again - eight years on. The George W Bush administration is out. The "global war on terror" is still on, renamed "overseas contingency operations" by the Barack Obama administration. Obama's "new strategy" - a war escalation - is in play in AfPak. Osama bin Laden may be dead or not. "Al-Qaeda" remains a catch-all ghost entity. September 11 - the neo-cons' "new Pearl Harbor" - remains the darkest jigsaw puzzle of the young 21st century.

The Rest is Here:
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/KI11Ak02.html

proceed with caution

In general I love lists like this, and in general this one may be ok, but specifically I immediately found an error: It ws not Atta's passport that was found at the WTC , it was Suqami's and it was not in the rubble, but on the street , apparently before the building collapsed. The chain of custody is the issue.

I have not had a chance to screen the rest of this very carefully, but PWC.

- omniadeo

Damn the Torpedoes!

If Not Me? Who? If Not Now? When?
http://www.northtexas911truth.com/

innaccurate lips sink ships

Joe,

In my experience, one of the worse things that can happen to us as we present 911 truth to sceptical (and of course hostile) audiences is to get caught with an innacuracy. One little false detail, however minor, gets corrected by a dismissive gatekeeper with a sneer and it's all over.

"Damn the torpedoes" shows great spirit, but you CAN get hit by a torpedoe. "Discretion is the better part of valor" is also a good motto. I do like the North Texas site.

Best.

- omniadeo

AsiaTimes Online

Asia Times Online comprises atimes.com, a free website, atimes.net, an advertisement-free site for subscribers, and atchinese.com, a free site for Chinese readers around the world. These are quality Internet-only publications that report on and examine geopolitical, political, economic and business issues. We look at these issues from an Asian perspective; this distinguishes us from the mainstream English-language media, whose reporting on Asian matters is generally by Westerners, for Westerners.

We are served by more than 50 correspondents and contributors in 25 Asian countries, the US, and Europe. Additional content is provided by news services and renowned think tank and investment analysts and academics.

Asia Times Online was founded at the beginning of 1999 and is incorporated and duly registered in Hong Kong. It derives its revenues from advertising, the resale of original content to other

publications and news services, and subscriptions to atimes.net.

Historically, in our publication policy and editorial outlook, we are the successor of Asia Times, the Hong Kong/ Bangkok-based daily print newspaper founded in 1995 and associated with the Manager Media Group, which had to cease publication in the summer of 1997 as a result of the Asian financial crisis. Like its predecessor, Asia Times Online gives its readers worldwide an overview of Asian news events, looking behind the headlines that are the staple of the news agencies and networks.

Asia Times Online is reaching a rapidly increasing global readership. Our readers are people of influence - investors, executives, diplomats, academics, journalists - who need to know about Asian political, economic and business affairs. We have become a "must read" for Westerners and Asians who do business with each other.

http://www.atimes.com/mediakit/readership.html

Current monthly visitors (Jan 2009)
3,223,518

Average monthly visitors (Dec 08 - Feb 09)
3,098,673

Current daily visitors (Jan 2009)
103,984

Average daily visitors (Dec 08 - Feb 09)
103,289

Current monthly page views (Jan 2009)
10,430,870

Average monthly page views (Dec 08 - Feb 09)
11,141,901

Current average daily page views (Dec 08 - Feb 09)
371,396

Top index pages and their page views per month (Jan 2009)

Front Page
China
South Asia
Southeast Asia
Korea
Japan
Middle East
Central Asia
War and Terror
Asian Economy
Global Economy
China Business
Book Reviews

830,668
107,918
106,873
103,371
92,716
91,449
90,132
90,512
80,610
90,305
108,711
26,099
43,667

248,984
859,704
157,280 (visits)

Engineer
Educator
Computer
Student
Managerial
Journalist
Analyst
Consultant
Researcher
Broker
Government
Director
Doctor
Entrepreneur
Admin Assistant
Accountant
Scientist
CEO
Lawyer
Healthcare

no cigar

My friend, the bona fides of the Asia Times, which I read quite often and which has been helpful on 911 , have nothing to do with it. There is a mistake in the article, which means the author didn't fact check his own work. Which means it is dangerous to depend on him.

Best.

- omniadeo

Who is depending on him? I'm celebrating the articles existance

Too bad you are so negative. The good news of the article reaching tens of thousands of readers around the world is lost because you spotted an error. I am guessing you did the same when millions (perhaps) watched Loose Change 2nd.

The vast majority of those people are with us today.

I did not write the article but it is out there. A tiny portion of readers will research and find the error. Some readers will become aware of 9/11 Questions for the first time. For others it will reinforce their understanding of the Truth and Lies of 9/11. A few critics will find the error and make a big deal of it.

Exposure is key

At this stage of the movement, I think exposure is key. Years ago, small errors became huge targets. I think things are changing. After 8 years, it's about time.

People may be slow but they're not stupid. (Even I sometimes forget exactly whose passport that was.)

Which hijackers' passport was or wasn't found is not as important now as the fact that "a" hijacker's passport was alleged to have survived (almost intact!) an event during which almost every single thing was turned to dust.

The take-home point is the outrageous claim, itself, and that has tremendous power! Thsi is like a "good" pandemic. The more people who are exposed to it, the more people who will "get it."

Thanks, Joe!