How Could They Plant Bombs in the World Trade Center?
The recent New York Times article on 9/11 implies that controlled demolition of the Twin Towers would have been impossible, because no one could have snuck in all of the explosive equipment.
I, and many others, have previously addressed this issue. I am re-posting this essay in light of the Times' hit piece on this issue.
How Could They Plant Bombs in the World Trade Center?
Recently, a smart, accomplished person told me:
"I don't believe that the World Trade Center could have been destroyed by controlled demolition . . . how could they have possibly planted bombs without anyone seeing them?"
In fact, there were plenty of opportunities to plant bombs in the World Trade Center. For example:
Bomb-sniffing dogs were inexplicably removed from the Twin Towers five days before 9-11
The Twin Towers had been evacuated a number of times in the weeks preceding 9/11
And -- as an interesting coincidence -- a Bush-linked company ran security at the trade centers, thus giving it free reign to the buildings.
These are just a few of the known, public examples of opportunities to plant bombs. There were undoubtedly many additional opportunities available to skilled operatives."
In addition to these facts, demolition and building collapse experts have purportedly raised the possibility of "explosive tenants" -- i.e. tenants in the World
Trade Centers who planted bombs in their own, rented space. For example, according to Webster Tarpley and others, Hugo Bachmann, professor emeritus of building dynamics and earthquake engineering at the world-famous Swiss Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule in Zürich:
“In the second scenario, an additional terrorist action would have caused the collapse of the buildings. In this way, according to Bachmann, buildings like the World Trade center can be destroyed without great logistical exertion.” The article went on to say that “Bachmann could imagine that the perpetrators had installed explosives on key supports in a lower floor before the attack.” If the perpetrators had rented office space, then these “explosive
tenants” could have calmly placed explosive charges on the vulnerable parts of the building “without having anyone notice.”
- Login to post comments
Besides all the speculation how
the charges could be placed or not, first the science, please. You can not disprove a demolition with explosives with this circumstantial deductice logic that there was no chance to place them. It's so absurd, there should be no room to fall for this trap.
And: It sure looks like a demolotion, because it was one.
The Easter Bunny Did It!
We are going about this thing the wrong way. It is not up to us to prove the government's version is wrong with our theories. It is up to the government to prove that 9/11 was the work of Osama in his bat-cave and his group of super-duper terrorists that pulled off 9/11. So far there is not one shred of evidence to this effect. Why, you might ask. Because the "Official Story" is a bold faced lie and an impossibility. The best defense is a good offense. Attack the "Official Story" at all times. What is sad is that the Bush Crime Family could say the Easter Bunny did it and people would still believe them..........................................."Every Dog Has His Day."
Very Simple
Hire Marvin Bush to run security.
exactly
exactly
Ever wonder how the bombs
Ever wonder how the bombs were put in the towers? Did you know the President's brother had a moving company in the towers and building 7 in the weeks prior to 911? Did you know that that moving company was Israeli (Urban Moving systems) and Israelis were caught on 911 taking pictures of themselves to the backdrop of the burning towers and laughing? They were arrested and the address for their moving company (yes the same one) turned up a front for the Mossad, it was an abandoned warehouse in New Jersey. (They were released by the FBI when Ashcroft put a lid on it, and they went back to Israel). Their van had traces of explosives in it, box cutters, thousands in cash, and hilighted maps of New York. When tested they failed polygraph tests which are 98% accurate. WRH has been on the frontlines with this story.
It was clearly a Mossad opperation.
Quote:
1. The Israeli "movers" cheered the 9-11 attacks to celebrate the successful accomplishment of the greatest spy operation ever pulled off in history.
2. One of them, or an accomplice, then calls a 9-1-1 police dispatcher to report Palestinian bomb-makers in a white van headed for the Holland Tunnel.
3. Having thus pre-framed the Palestinians with this phone call, the Israeli bombers then head for the George Washington Bridge instead, where they will drop off their time-bomb van and escape with Urban Moving accomplices.
4. But the police react very wisely and proactively by closing off ALL bridges and tunnels instead of just the Holland Tunnel. This move inadvertently foils the Israelis' misdirection play and leads to their own capture and 40 day torture.
5. To cover up this story, the U.S. Justice Department rounds up over 1000 Arabs for minor immigration violations and places them in New York area jails. The Israelis therefore become less conspicuous as the government and media can now claim that the Israelis were just immigration violators caught in the same dragnet as many other Arabs.
6. After several months, FBI and Justice Department "higher-ups" are able to gradually push aside the local FBI agents and free the Israelis quietly.
source Go and read all of it.
http://www.rys2sense.com/anti
http://www.rys2sense.com/anti-neocons/viewtopic.php?t=1388
Let's also not forget what
Let's also not forget what kind of experience the over 200 Israelis arrested in connection with 9/11 had:
Hmmm... and Larry Silverstein just happens to be pretty tight with Netanyahu and Sharon, and made hundreds of millions off of the insurance lawsuit after 9/11. Gosh, now I really wonder how those explosives got in there.
getting bombs in
Marvin P. Bush, the president’s younger brother, was a principal in a company called Securacom that provided security for the World Trade Center, United Airlines, and Dulles International Airport. The company, Burns noted, was backed by KuwAm, a Kuwaiti-American investment firm on whose board Marvin Burns also served. [Utne]
If he ,or did you mean another brother,also run or owned Urban moving then it just keeps getting better!
The Dancing Israelis were tortured?
_4. But the police react very wisely and proactively by closing off ALL bridges and tunnels instead of just the Holland Tunnel. This move inadvertently foils the Israelis' misdirection play and leads to their own capture and 40 day torture.
I know the dancing Israelis have sued claiming they were tortured by their "FBI captors", but do they have a good case?
The real question is what were the results of the investigation into their activities in America.
"Among the 'spider-man' skeptics are those who claim that no human can shoot web and stick to walls... They conveniently ignore the fact that he was bitten by a radioactive spider."
Daily Bugle editorial debunking the claims of spider-man deniers
The Moving Company
You are mistaken on the moving company. An investigator who did indepth investigation into this very thing reported it was an Islamic Moving Company AND they have a connection to VP Cheney !
The new pearl harbor by D.R.Griffin paperback
I am reading this right now. Look at pages 177 thru 185 (Afterword to the second edition).
Its such an amazing piece of detective work by Griffin and his helpers.
Wow!!
And this book was written in 2004.
Do I smell subpeonas and treason and murder convictions and terror for the perps who committed the 911 crime ? Yes.
I just hope we can stop a 911 TWO.
Detroit and Chicago you have big exercises next week. Look at www.falseflagnews.com
Don't let them do these wargame exercises. Call up your local govt and demand they not do them. Stop these exercises which are in the name of a phoney war on terror. There is no terror but what comes from the "war on terror" terror.
forgot to mention.
Sorry, forgot to mention that pages 177 thru 185 are on the section about "More Evidence for controlled demolition of WTC1, 2 and 7."
related to the previous post.
Innuendo
Innuendo is not evidence of placement of explosives.
Now that Fetzer and Jones have admitted that they do not KNOW how any explosives were placed but say that they are in the process of "investigating" that - how convenient never having to say you have no evidence - and Jones's Thermite/Thermate theory has been completely blown out of the water, no amount of making more claims is going to save them from their total lack of physical evidence.
Link me up to where Jones'
Link me up to where Jones' thermate conclusion was debunked.
TROLL ALERT
And he doesnt even identify himself.
Not knowing how they were placed is not proof none were placed...The evidence of controlled demolition is right before your eyes, troll.
Where has Jones thermite/thermate theory been 'blown out of the water'? Not by NIST or Pop Mechanics....
Lets see YOUR evidence for YOUR claims.
lol and where has Jones
lol and where has Jones thermate theory been debunked?
Are people aware that many
Are people aware that many floors of the WTC were unoccupied, and in fact the elevators did not stop at them UNLESS there was a special pass....
ALso, do people remember thatat least one moving van used by israelis registered positive for traces of explosives.
more at this
more at this site:
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/fiveisraelis.html
yeah, these 2 points are
yeah, these 2 points are completely illogical and don't hold up to Occam's razor... they're unkown, and have many potential answers so should be discarded.
for example, maybe some workers were told they were installing a new fire-prevention device on the columns which in fact contained explosives - and this could happen before the dogs were removed if they were packaged correctly.
these illogical rebuttals will keep getting knocked down until these people are forced to actually explain how the buildings fell the way they did... or admit they don't know squat.
And What About This
"When the fire started, the room was sealed," said Jones, who was in the command center when explosions rocked the building. "Flames were shooting off the walls....We started putting wet towels under the doors. The Fire Department unsealed the door and grabbed us by the hand and said, 'Run!' reference - http://www.amny.com/news/local/groundzero/ny-nyaler122362178sep12,0,3192...
This refers to what was happening on the 22nd floor - some 80 floors beneath. Never mind the reference to the explosions. How did the walls get on fire in this manner so early?
An argument for the damage in the lobby is that the aeroplane's fuel came down the elevators. Yet I have seen people putting up plans saying that most of the elevators did not go all the way up, save for one of them.
It would be helpful it someone who knows about the structure of the building could start approaching 911 truth specifically from this angle. Is it possible that the fuel was the cause of the explosions lower down, including the celler. Have we got visual plans to show us the elevators so we can see their spacial relationship to the command center, lobby, or celler - and more specifically WHERE those elevators went higher up?
The damage in the lobby was not caused by a fireball
It was caused by the basement explosions reported by William Rodriguez and others seconds before the first plane even hit.
Makes you wonder if some of these lunatics were thinking maybe the North Tower would topple into the South Tower if it was impacted by a jet right after having a bomb go off in the foundation... Had it happened that way I'd bet there'd be a lot of hype around various domino theories...
_
"Among the 'spider-man' skeptics are those who claim that no human can shoot web and stick to walls... They conveniently ignore the fact that he was bitten by a radioactive spider."
Daily Bugle editorial debunking the claims of spider-man deniers
You were careful NOT to
You were careful NOT to include the "5 Dancing Israeli's", whose moving truck smelled like bombs, in your "hypothesis" of how the towers were rigged, weren't you?
http://killtown.blogspot.com/2005/11/dancing-israelis-on-911.html
This is a HUGE clue and very telling of your true loyalties. This is a pattern that is typical of 911blogger.com, for you will do ANYTHING to cover Israel's ass. No "donations" for you.
So you think the best
So you think the best intelligence agency in the world hired agents who were jumping up and down when the world trade center went down? What were they doing? the horah?
Once the first plane hit I
Once the first plane hit I would bet there was NO security checks if you wanted to enter either Tower. Anyone with a fake fireman or police uniform would have access to the building, to carry in anything they wanted.
Granted they would need more then 1 hour to plant enough explosives, but don't think that once this started it was business as usual down there.
this is stupid
you and your commie pinkos, don't deserve to live in America.
you are always bashing President Bush and his administration, and are always supporting terrorism.
Osama Bin Laden took credit for the 9/11 terrorism attacks, why can't you idiots just realize that, and stop pinning everything bad that happens on the Bush administration.
your linked article also contains this claim....
George, i pulled out this quote from your linked article above [referring to the planting of demolition charges]:
Then on the morning of Sept. 11, the demolition explosives would have had to withstand the impacts of the airplanes, since the collapse did not begin for 57 minutes in one tower, and 102 minutes in the other.
that's a fact i've never been able to wrap my head around. if one assumes that charges have been planted throughout the towers, how then can a plane crash into the towers without setting some of the charges off? [the suspect] thermite doesn't ignite easily so perhaps thermite charges could have withstood the impact, but doesn't seem likely to me. RDX can withstand small arms fire, but would it hold up to a boeing 767 impact? if a plane impact is going to do the kind of damage we see in WTC1/2, then how could any preplanted charges have been prevented from going off as a result of the plane impact? if you've got a building loaded up with explosives, how can you crash a plane into it without setting off some explosives? thoughts?
the twin towers collapsed
the twin towers collapsed one floor at a time from the top down, if this were the result of planned demolition it would require precise preperation on every floor, which would take an army of experts an incredible amount of time. of course all that planning would probably go right out the the window when you throw in a variable like the building being hit by an airliner.
how you can think our government is clever enough to pull this off when on just about every other critical situation they've proven themselves to be incopetent boobs is beyond me.
as usual, the wackier the
as usual, the wackier the story, the easier it is for wackos to believe