The Ends and the Means
How can we figure out who to trust? How do we know who is telling the truth and who is lying? How do we know who is helping the efforts for truth and justice and who is instead harming such efforts?
Well, one important test is to look at the PROCESS people are using. In other words, forget for a minute what someone is saying. Instead, focus on how they are doing things.
Indeed, President George W. Bush has said many beautiful things about democracy and security, values and principals, freedom and liberty. But what has he actually done? Hasn't he actually acted by using a process which is authoritarian, destructive of innocent lives, freedoms, liberties, American values and human dignity?
As another example, in the 9/11 truth movement, the following are some red flags that someone is not acting in the best interests of truth and justice:
- Spending more time attacking members WITHIN the truth movement than attempting to bring the perpetrators of the horrific 9/11 attacks to justice
- Working in "gangs" to attack 9/11 truthers with false claims, making it seem like many people believe the false accusations being made about those working for 9/11 truth
- Placing their need for attention, power or fame above being a member of a team working for truth and justice
- Threatening the use of force, whether physical, legal or otherwise, against everyone who disagrees with his or her viewpoint
- Focusing more energy disrupting discussion and action than moving the ball forward
- Mischaracterizing silence in the face of a false accusation as an admission, when silence might be due to the crazy nature of the accusation or experience that the accuser will simply make up new, false accusations when confronted with the truth concerning the original accusation
Talk is cheap. As alot of people have said, you'll learn alot more about people by watching what they're actually doing and the "fruits" they are producing than their words.
And as Emerson said, "Who you are speaks so loudly that I can't hear what you're saying".
Talk is cheap, and there are many clever tongues. Moreover, we all have blind spots, and if we use a corrupt process to achieve noble goals, we are no better than President Bush.
We all have to get better at judging people by their actions and their fruits, their process and who they are. Because even while we are fighting for heroic and noble goals, we will become as bad as those we are fighting if we adopt an "ends justify the means" mentality. Because when the ends justify the means, the new boss will be just like the old boss.
Don't believe me? Then I've got one follow-up question for you: Didn't those who carried out the 9/11 attacks believe that the ends justify the means?
- GeorgeWashington's blog
- Login to post comments
Spot on GW...
I'm just so glad that more and more people are seeing their charades for what they truly are...
Stay strong GeorgeWashington !!!
You get my vote for president
No retreat, no surrender
Confirmation: Directed Energy Weapons are Operational
Let's all try to avoid talking about the weapons actually used to disintegrate the Towers.
That way we can stay focused on the easily discredited poison pill of "thermate"....
That way we can also blindly ignore the COINTELPRO deployment of Los Alamos "scientists" (contractors and employees) to provide "leadership" and "guidance" and "credibility" to the 9/11 "truth" movement.
Let's also try to avoid talking about the "GeorgeWashingtonblog" author: intellectual property shyster Alexander Floum, who services so many DoE and DoD contractors, that he probably has a top secret security clearance himself.
http://www.total911.info/2006/12/pnac-loves-space-weapons-energy-laser.html
http://www.heritage.org/Press/Events/ev112905a.cfm
You're right. GeorgeWashington was spot on
at revealing his true motivation to destroy the truth movement.
Why does GeorgeWashington have so many close friends in the Bush administration?
And what can you tell us about the PROCESS of trying to takeover & steal & destroy the websites of a leading 9/11 truth group? Why would you want to do that? The only reason I can think of is to destroy any and all opposition to the government's story and agenda.
Should we watch what people are actually doing or should we just go along with the kind babyface and giggle?
Should we watch what this site is actually doing or should we just drink up another helping of the KoolAid being served here?
Heres another
Heres another one...constantly making sure your page full of trashing is at the top of the blog CONSTANTLY by going in and "updating" a punctuation mark . I will refrain from naming names as I am pretty sure most people can figure it out for themselves.
Nice one...
GW
"I think that we have to look at these alternative groups and these alternative people who are continuing to make films and bring their research to the public."
Sally Regenhard - 9/11 Family Member
George your Broadband doesn't suck, it's actually good
You certainly are right about the actions people take as opposed to what they say. We can definatly use that one for all the lousy Neocon, Strauss types that are way deep into the 9/11 job. But the CIA has definatly got their COINTELPRO people in the truth movement, you can bet on it since they have been involved in media manipulation since the late 40's.
That means We have to be wary of who comes out and has something to add that seems new or looks new. It has to be checked out to see if it passes the test of us to reveal itself as being another piece of the puzzle or just another false lead.
Congress is no different, and I believe that Congress is still the key We need to get an investigation. We can still carry the most power if certain members can be persuaded that the pressure will keep ramping up and to not have a serious forum nationally is to sell out our freedom.
False Flag Terror Of The New World Order
Methods used to facilitate staged attacks: http://www.infowars.com/articles/terror/false_flag_terror_of_the_nwo.htm
Great article GW! It's about
Great article GW! It's about looking at the fruits of people's actions. If you look at Reynolds for example his fruits have matured into highly counter productive damaging mouldy fermenting dogshit. So I think you've got to look at why people would align themselves with that type of ridiculous behaviour, and that's why Fetzer is so suspect, it's mainly his position in all this that makes my eyebrows rise.
Either
George Washington does not agree with what you just said, or he is not sincere.
Nice writeup GW. I think
Nice writeup GW.
I think it's also good to specify what we mean by 'attacks' because some will try to use that general idea as a reason to block necessary internal critique. I usually say specifically "personal attacks" and include a couple of relevant examples, like the Reynolds-Wood use of the word "retarded" to describe Steve Jones.
Attack pieces, as opposed to critiques, often include personal attacks as well as false assertions, such as Nico's endless assertions about people being agents. Critiques may mention that a person's behavior amounts to the same as an agent's might, but will never assert an unfounded belief about someone's allegiance because the purpose of a critique is to assess the work and the outcome of the behavior, not the person themselves.
come on, be real please
"Critiques may mention that a person's behavior amounts to the same as an agent's might,"
People need to stop accusing each other of being agents, or the same as agents, period. It is stupid, and it is one of the main goals of agent infiltration in the first place. Why feed that? Just assess each others work on the merits. If you don't think someone should say something in public, explain why. If they disagree, that is their prerogative.
Hurt
I knew that George Bush was behind 9/11 the day it happened. In fact, my reaction that day was "I can't believe that he went this far." At the time, America was completely fed up with George Bush because he was not doing a good job at all. In fact, he wasn't even doing his job. There was a lot of hype around the fact that he was not even living at the White House but instead chose to live on his farm in Texas. America viewed him as lazy and undeserving of Presidency, especially since he did not win the popular vote by America anyways. His whole Presidency was a farce. Just about the time when America was getting a fairly strong movement toward removing him from office, 9/11 suddenly happened. I felt like 9/11 was George Bush slapping America in the face saying "Shut up and take that bitch! Now what are you going to do?!" Well America set back and shut up ever since then. We are afraid. We are scared to death. Everyday in the news since 9/11 there have been threat and scare tactics to instill fear into America. It is almost like the news is working with George Bush to say, "Look! If you don't stay sitting down and shut up America, George Bush will hurt you again! Next time it will be worse!" They are always threating us in the news... "Oh you can't take toothpaste on the airplane... Oh America is on Red Alert again... Oh terrorists are threatening again... Oh Bin Lauden is at it again and we can't stop him... Oh..." Over and over. America has been put back in its place by George Bush. He has bitchslapped America and all America can do is cry. After all, if we make too much noise he will turn his bombs and firepower on us again. Next time it WILL be worse. Next time George Bush will hurt us BAD. We probably should shut up and not make any noise and continue to accept his mental abuse through the news waves.
I have this saying
You may have heard it before..
"Please come and take my guns.... I'll give them to you..... BULLETS FIRST!!!"
Another,
Some people roll over after getting F#*Ked.... Others return the favor!!
F*#K ME?.....NO...F#*K YOU!
There is nothing to fear...but fear itself.
If Bush is willing to light that fuse.... I say bring it!.... He best do it soon cause as soon as the LC Final Cut comes out.... this movement is going to be amped....and rolling stronger than they could have ever imagined.
Every person who saw the first will see this one.... then tell 4 others to see it..... we could quadruple in one month.... that's why I want to have our ducks in a row.... I want our info to be tight.... and I want our steadfast resolve strengthened.
I WiLL Never Acknowledge That Asshole As
"President Bush"
Didn't you mean to say "Mass Murder Bush". It is a fact. He was definitely NOT elected to the position you mention.
Gary
911truthnc.org
“it is possible to fool all the people all the time—when government and press cooperate.” George Seldes - "legendary investigative reporter"
Excellent Example, GeorgeWashington!
You seem to be very consistent with posting divisive threads. Why is that?
Is your means to your end the destruction of the truth movement? Is that why you spend more time attacking members WITHIN the truth movement than attempting to bring the perpetrators of the horrific 9/11 attacks to justice?
And what about the perps WITHIN "the truth movement"? Are they off-limits because they have already infiltrated successfully?
Like, just a hypothetical, say someone who designed the weapons used to kill 3000 people that day is now claiming to be "WITHIN the truth movement," -- even as he claims the weapons he designed don't exist?
Didn't George W Bush claim he wanted to get truth & justice for the 9/11 victims? Didn't Tom Kean? Are those two "WITHIN the truth movement"?
And what can you tell us about the PROCESS of trying to takeover & steal & destroy the websites of a leading 9/11 truth group? Why would you want to do that? The only reason I can think of is to destroy any and all opposition to the government's story and agenda.
Should we watch what people are actually doing or should we just go along with the kind babyface and giggle?
Should we watch what this site is actually doing or should we just drink up another helping of the KoolAid being served here?