rumsfeld's recent comments on flight 93

well, rumsfeld had a slip of the tongue.. alot of people will just write it off.. obviously he just made a mistake.. i would argue his mistake was telling the truth..
http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=42112

I think all of us have a sense if we imagine the kind of world we would face if the people who bombed the mess hall in Mosul, or the people who did the bombing in Spain, or the people who attacked the United States in New York, shot down the plane over Pennsylvania and attacked the Pentagon, the people who cut off peoples' heads on television to intimidate, to frighten – indeed the word 'terrorized' is just that. Its purpose is to terrorize, to alter behavior, to make people be something other than that which they want to be.

some have said this is probably a mis-quote, so here is the audio file, just seek to about 3:30 and listen:
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4244364
just click on the 'listen' link at the top..

the idea that 93 was shot down isnt discussed too much, even in the 9/11 truth movement.. i think is mostly because there is no real footage.. but there are reports of debris found over 8 miles away.. the main arguement is that a plane crashing into the ground wouldnt have debris found 8 miles away, but a plane blown up in the air very well could.. there are some who beleive there wasnt even a plane that crashed there.. but there was, ive seen pics of some of the debris.. do some research on shanksville and flight 93 and you will find tons of locals who think they saw it shot down, and at the end of the day i find it quite plausible based on the limited evidence available to the public..
-----