Great Blogger Post from Rigorous Intuition

i just ran across a new post on on the subject of 9/11.. he is the same blogger which posted The Coincidence Theorist's Guide to 9/11 back in September 2004..

here it is:
The guns of 9/11

There's a lot of wiggle room for informed speculation concerning 9/11, but it should be done on the back end. If it doesn't follow an argument based on tangibles, if it doesn't bring up the rear, there's not much likelihood of it being informed. There's no reason why the case against Cheney, Rumsfeld, et al should be led with hypothetical scenarios, when what we know is already enough to condemn them. Enough happened that is beyond reasonable dispute; we shouldn't let our conjecture about how it happened dominate the argument. Even if it's well-founded.

definately worth the read, thanks to for the link!