A Few New Articles from tvnewslies.org

They Are Not “Conspiracy Theories” - They Are, in Fact, “Discoveries”

There seems to be no set criteria for dismissing information as a foolish conspiracy theory. The only prerequisite for information to be so categorize seems to be the desire to reject it. The reason for the rejection does not seem to matter. It appears that anything people do not want to believe is simply set aside as not believable.
..
It's time to put an end to this nonsense once and for all. It's also time dispense with the name calling and understand the dynamics of what is happening when new information is rejected. We have to deal with the resistance to any tampering with accepted "truths." And we have to find ways to convince people to seriously consider the new information, new discoveries if you will - that so many refuse, under any circumstances, to acknowledge.
..
9/11 remains the perfect example with which to illustrate my concerns. A massive amount of valid evidence exists to show that elements of the official story (itself a conspiracy theory because it is not verifiable), are false. It is not possible, however, to use the newly discovered evidence as the basis for a conclusion about what actually happened and who was responsible. At least not yet. There are many indications, and there is a long trail of evidence suggesting US government complicity, but that is all there is. That much is a theory, but the evidence itself is comprised of facts. That evidence can not be dismissed simply because the theories that are wrapped around them are inconclusive. The proverbial baby cannot be thrown out with the bath water.

A Word to All about 9/11

The Truth about the 9/11 investigation: Taking into account that the Kean Commission was not tasked with finding out what happened on 9/11, no investigation has yet to be conducted by the Bush administration into the events of 9/11 other than that of the independent research community.
..
There is no question that anyone who takes the time to listen to the testimony of the people involved, view the videos, examine the events leading up to 9/11 will understand that there are many questions to be answered and that the official story does not only not answer them, but it actually contradicts the actual events. The report contradicts the recorded testimonies of the witness. It omits testimony.

When the findings of the Kean Commission are used as proof of the official story the proof is invalid. The Kean Comission was not investigating 9/11. Remember that the Kean Commission was not asked to find out what happened, they were asked to make recommendations to improve national security based on the official story. In other words they were not trying to find out what happened. They were using the story told to them by the Bush administration as the basis for their recommendations. They were not trying to find out what took place. It was not their job. The public is under the impression that the Kean Commission was supposed to find out what happened but nothing can be further from the truth.

Taking into account that the Kean Commission was not tasked with finding out what happened on 9/11, no investigation has yet to be conducted by the Bush administration into the events of 9/11 other than that of the independent research community.

It is high time that we listen to the findings of the only body to actually investigate the events of 9/11; and that body is the independent research community. It is not the Bush administration, or the Kean Commission, both of whom have yet to explain what happened on 9/11.

Start paying attention to the independent researchers for they are the only people trying to find out the truth about 9/11.

-----