911Research Releases Major Article Critiquing NIST's WTC Report

I just noticed that Jim Hoffman from 911research.wtc7.net has released a major rebuttal to the recent NIST report on the collapses of WTC1 and WTC2.

You can find this rebuttal at the link below. The rebuttal is quite lengthy in scope and will take some time to peruse, but I think it is great to see such an in-depth response to the NIST report.

Building a Better Mirage - NIST's 3-Year $20,000,000 Cover-Up of the Crime of the Century

NIST's investigation is often cited as proving the official theory that the plane crashes and fires caused the collapses. Yet the Report makes no attempt to explain how the buildings totally collapsed, despite the lack of a single historical precedent for a steel-frame skyscraper totally collapsing for any reason other than controlled demolition. And, in contrast to the Report's voluminous detail about the plane crashes, fires, and loss of life, it makes no attempt to characterize, let alone explain, the demolition-like features of the collapses, such as their explosiveness and nearly free-fall rapidity.

Be sure to check out the whole article, it is way too lengthy for me to summarize here.

Although the deadline for public comments to the NIST report has passed, I suggest that you continue to send in comments anyways.