9/11 Lies: Another Basis for Impeachment


"Ten days after the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, President Bush was told in a highly classified briefing that the U.S. intelligence community had no evidence linking the Iraqi regime of Saddam Hussein to the attacks and that there was scant credible evidence that Iraq had any significant collaborative ties with Al Qaeda".

And yet Bush, Cheney and other top administration officials claimed and continue to claim that Saddam was behind 9/11. See this analysis. Indeed, Bush administration officials apparently swore in a lawsuit that Saddam was behind 9/11.

The 9-11 lies are just as important a grounds for impeachment as lies regarding Iraq's weapons of mass destruction. Why? Because the administration's false claims about Saddam and 9/11 helped convince a large portion of the American public to invade Iraq. While the focus now may be on false WMD claims, it is important to remember that, at the time, the Saddam-911 link was at least as important in many people's minds as a reason to invade Iraq.

Moreover, the trauma of September 11, 2001 is what galvanized many Americans to rally around the Bush administration in general, to close ranks in time of peril, and to give Bush his "mandate" (putting questions of election fraud to the side). Ever since that terrible day, the American people have been terrified, and thus irrational, based upon the trauma of the vicious attacks. Since most Americans believe that the bad guys are "out there" and are about to get us unless we have a strong leader to fight them, they will not and CANNOT make any logical decisions about any other foreign or domestic issues until "we get the bad guys".

Indeed, the WMD hoax probably would not have worked if it wasn't for the anti-Arab hysteria after September 11th.
Similarly, Americans are crazed by the fear of Arab terrorists just like Germans were terrified of communist terrorists. Both peoples have handed over all of their power to their leaders in order to buy an imaginary security.

The Nazis might have been brought to justice well before the Nuremberg trials if the Reichstag hoax had been exposed at the time.

But Can They Really Be Impeached for 9/11 Lies?

Former U.S. Attorney General Ramsey Clark has stated that "Making, ordering and condoning false statements and propaganda and concealing information vital to public discussion and informed judgment to create a climate of fear and hatred and destroy opposition to his war goals" is grounds for impeachment (see paragraph 10) and see paragraph 7 here.

Lying about Saddam's connection to 9/11 may thus be an impeachable offense.

Hey Dantastic, thats a good

Hey Dantastic, thats a good looking site. Its a shame you had such a low turnout for your video presentation. Keep trying!!

I updated my blog. take a

I updated my blog. take a look. http://www.911truthseekers.blogspot.com

"The building is like a giant banana unpeeling itself. A vast quantity of debris is being propelling away from the building. Thus the mass bearing down on the building is dramatically decreasing as the building collapses. Consider that the building's support collumns become stronger as you go towards the ground (to support the weight of the building above). However, even though the mass bearing down on the buildling is decreasing, and the building is getting stronger simultaneously, the collapse of either tower did not slow down as it progressed towards the ground. They collapsed in roughly the same speed as an object in free fall."

I've never heard anyone point out that the load bearing down on the collapsing towers should be getting lighter as it comes down because most of the debris is flying out and away from the buildings. meanwhile the collumns get stronger towards the ground. yet, the collapse does not slow down