Voice Joins 9/11 Skeptics
http://www.freemarketnews.com/WorldNews.asp?nid=3254
Yet another venue has weighed in with skepticism, toward the official story of what happened on September 11, 2001. The Village Voice, in a story picked up by prisonplanet, asks "Ten Big Questions About 9/11," and attempts to open the dialogue even further than it has already been on the Internet's back pages.
The story notes the sizable number of inquiries that have already taken place, most recently the 9-11 Public Discourse Project, an offshoot of the 9-11 Commission after their official mandate lapsed in 2004, and the National Institute of Standards and Technology, each of which just concluded their own investigations. "Some questions can't be answered," the story admits. "People who lost loved ones will never know exactly how the end came, if it hurt, what the final thoughts and words were. But other questions are more tractable.
Here are 10 of them:
1. Where was the "National Command Authority"?
2. Who gave the order to try to shoot the planes down?
3. What exactly were all those firefighters doing in the towers?
4. Did anyone think the towers would collapse?
5. Why was Giuliani's command bunker at ground zero?
6. Why did 7 WTC fall?
7. How did the twin towers fall?
8. How dangerous was - and is - the air at ground zero?
9. What exactly did Zacarias Moussaoui plan to do?
10. What's on those blanked-out pages?Regarding the last point, they note that "'The Joint Inquiry Into Intelligence Community Activities Before and After the Terrorist Attacks of September 11, 2001,' which was released in late 2002, included 28 pages that were blanked out, apparently concerning the possible role of Saudi government officials. Those aren't the only blank spots in the public record. As the Voice reported in October, there are multiple redactions in the FDNY oral histories that in some cases seem to concern the radios or suspicious activity near the WTC site before and during the attacks."
- Login to post comments
Can someone list for me the
Can someone list for me the 3 best DVDs available on the topic of 911 alternative viewpoints? I'm most interested in clear, persuasive, logical arguments.
Confronting the
Confronting the Evidence
Loose Change (2nd edition)
Painful Deceptions
those are my top 3, but what do I know?
The Great Conspiracy The
The Great Conspiracy
The Truth & Lies About 9/11
Hijacking Catastrophe
"There Is A Major
"There Is A Major Probability Of A Terrorist Incident Within The Next Three Months"
911 Eyewitness Confronting
911 Eyewitness
Confronting the Evidence DVD
David Ray Griffin CSpan lecture
and lastly Money Masters is a must watch - a MUST WATCH.
Taylor, agreed The Money
Taylor, agreed The Money Masters should be view by everyone before even delving into 9/11 truth.
[viewed]... sorry a bit
[viewed]... sorry a bit tired.
My recommendations of
My recommendations of DVD's...
most are available to view free at google video.
Loose Change
Alex Jones Martial Law 911:Rise of the Police State
Painful Questions
runner up - Bohemian Grove, to see these fuckers REAL attitudes and how Satanic they truly, TRULY, are
This isn't just a political or military conflict, it is above all else, a spiritual war.
So far unmentioned
So far unmentioned ones:
Orwell Rolls in his Grave
SPIN documentary on how the media lies to manipulate us
Milton Friedman - Free to Choose
George W Bush - The Jesus Factor
On God's Right
The Road to 911 - A chronology
The World According to Bush
Noam Chomsky - Distorted Morality
Noam Chomsky - Power and Terror - In Our Times
What I've learned about US Foreign Policy
OutFoxed
James Randi - The Search for the Chimera
PiracyIsGood
The God Who Wasn't There
Supernatural Science
David Attenborough - Life on Earth
Joseph Campbell - The Hero's Journey
All must-see.
mvgroup.org has a lot of them
In danger of getting wildly
In danger of getting wildly off-topic, I still think 'Surplus' is worth mentioning too. And I believe Paul Thompson's 911 Timeline is, eventually, a must read from start to friggin end, more so than all dvds mentioned above. Not persuasive but crystal clear, even though you need to come up with the logic yourself.