Heavy Metal


The steel from the debris of the World Trade Centers provides evidence that the buildings were demolished.

Specifically, metal tests on steel remains from the world trade center show something never before seen in building fires: reactions which caused "intergranular melting capable of turning a solid steel girder into Swiss cheese." Sulfur and other elements commonly used in high-explosives were also found. The New York Times described this as "perhaps the deepest mystery uncovered in the investigation." (this quote is contained in the following link)

As stated by the scientists who studied this phenomenon:

"A one-inch column has been reduced to half-inch thickness. Its edges -- which are curled like a paper scroll -- have been thinned to almost razor sharpness. Gaping holes -- some larger than a silver dollar -- let light shine through a formerly solid steel flange. This Swiss cheese appearance shocked all of the fire-wise professors, who expected to see distortion and bending -- but not holes"

Moreover, an expert stated about World Trade Center building 7 (the third building in the World Trade Center to collapse on 9/11):

"A combination of an uncontrolled fire and the structural damage might have been able to bring the building down, some engineers said. But that would not explain steel members in the debris pile that appear to have been PARTLY EVAPORATED in extraordinarily high temperatures" (pay-per-view); or see a cached version of the article here.

Steel does not evaporate unless it is heated to at least 5000 degrees Fahrenheit. Everyone agrees that fires from conventional building fires are thousands of degrees cooler than that.

I'm not aware of any

I'm not aware of any high-explosives that use sulfer in their detonation reaction. For all I know they might exist, but they wouldn't be at all common.

Sulfer is quite common in deflagration explosives (i.e., low-order explosives). But these wouldn't be suitable to bring down a steel-frame building.

Prof. Steven E. Jones mentioned in at least one version of his article "Why Indeed did the WTC Buildings Collapse?" ( http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/htm7.html ) that sulfer can be used in a thermite reaction. I've known about thermite since I was a kid, but I've not really studied its chemistry very in-depth beyond the standard mixture of thermite. Thus, if Prof. Steven E. Jones is correct that certain mixtures of thermite can utilize sulfer in their reaction, then this would explain the sulfidation of the structural steel that was observed from the destroyed WTC buildings.

Also, high explosives use gas pressure in order to cut through steel. Not a lot of heat is thereby transfered, as most of it gets released as expanding gas.

When we hear all the accounts of molten metal in the ruins of the WTC, combined with the accounts of sulfidation of the structural steel from the WTC, then it's certain that some form of thermite reaction was used (even discounting the sulfidation process, the mere fact of molten metal proves some form of thermite reaction occured, since high explosives can't very well to do that, and burning jet fuel and/or burning office contents SURE AS HELL AREN'T GOING TO DO THAT).

This isn't to say that high explosives weren't used, as probably both high explosives *and* some form of thermite reaction were used.

But the mere fact of the evaporated steel and molten metal proves that supposed Muslims flying jets into the WTC is not what brought it down. Jet fuel and/or office contents cannot do that. PERIOD! Excepting a very hot welder's blow-torch (which of course doesn't apply to the destruction of the WTC), the only common chemical reaction that can make that happen is thermite. (Of course, high explosive get hot enough to make that happen [i.e., if their explosive reaction lasted for a long period of time], but they are ruled out on this particular count because the reaction doesn't last long enough to transfer enough heat to make that happen. Their destructive force comes from the pressure they produce.)

James, have you read the

James, have you read the Finnish site that demonstrates quite convincingly that a Hydrogen suitcase bomb ( Pure Hydrogen, no uranium or plutonium) detonated in the basement.

Quite impressively, it seems to explain the way the TOP BLEW OFF SIDEWAYS, yet then "righted" itself before collapsing downward. Think about it: The roof blew UP and OVER, then was VAPORIZED.

Explains the NYFD personnel interviewed on tv, stating he has entered numorous buildings after they were extensively damamged by fire.

he stated he saw NO DEBRIS, NO BODIES, No Desks, no Computors, no rugs, no file cabinets, no nothing, except a small portion of the telephone keypad.

A hydrogen bomb, placed in basement, would blow upward in an inverted pyramid shape. The site also shows an angle of one of the towers, and i swear, you can see the inverted pyramid shape in the explosion.

Wanna decide for yourself? I don't know how to furnish the link without messing up the comment section, so I will break it up, and you will need to put it back together and paste it into your search.

Here, friend:http://www.saunalahti.fi/wtc2001/soldier4.htm

Specifically, you will see a diagram showing what the author contends is the way the hydrogen bomb was placed in basement(author claims extesive military experience with hydrogen bombs), and the pattern of the explosion.

Then, compare the diagram to the two photos on one page showing the two towers still standing, but one has a mushroom cloud blowing the roof off. Looks like an inverted pyramid to me, how about you?

Also, very very illustrating, is the photos of underground hydrogen bombs being controlled detonations in desert.

Why interesting? Because of the patterns of the explosions....go look, I'll wager you'll have your eyes opened.

This site also explains why thermite could not have melted CARS in the basement, and on the nearby sidewalks outside. Not could it have "swiss cheesed " the I-beams like this site describes., nor vaporised one inch thick I-beams.

Very interesting site, and you can click "English" for translation.

Hope you enjoy....because we need to stay motivated, to ensure all guilty parties are dealt with severely.

This is one "Cold Case" that MILLIONS are following, and multi-millions more would, if we can only breakthrough the mass mind control of our "Liberal Media".

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Each of these prominent leaders now claims that there are serious problems with the official government story of 9/11. Some of these highly respected individuals even believe that 9/11 may have been an inside job. It can be very uncomfortable to even consider the possibility that certain individuals within government were involved either in allowing the attacks to happen, or in some way facilitating them in order to forward their hidden agendas. Yet the facts increasingly point in that direction.

* Morgan Reynolds, Former Chief Economist under President Bush
* Paul Craig Roberts, Assistant Sect. of Treasury under Pres. Reagan
* U.S. Senator Mark Dayton
* U.S. Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney
* Professor David Ray Griffin, Renowned Theologian
* Robert M. Bowman, Head of Advanced Space Programs for DOD
* Michael Meacher, UK Minister of Environment (1997 - 2003)
* Catherine Austin Fitts, Ass. Sect. of Housing For President Bush
* Stephen A. Jones, BYU Physics Professor
* James H. Fetzer, McKnight University Professor at the University of Minnesota Duluth

This picture shows the

This picture shows the pyroclastic cloud clearly.


God bless Bill Biggart- he was a brave man- RIP

U.S. Senator Mark Dayton I

U.S. Senator Mark Dayton

I watched Senator Mark Dayton's appearance yesterday on C-SPAN...

Click Here

He may have had doubts about 9/11 in the past, but he's certainly not voicing them now. In fact, it appears he doesn't think Bush should be impeached?

Here's an interesting little

Here's an interesting little story. Make sure you find the quotes I posted at the bottom...

Katrina Weaker Than First Thought

"Congress authorized the Corps to protect New Orleans against a storm only up to Category 3"

"John M. Barry -- who criticized the Corps in "Rising Tide," a history of the Mississippi River flood of 1927 -- said that if Katrina did not exceed the design capacity of the New Orleans levees, the federal government may bear ultimate responsibility for this disaster."

Watch these witnesses from the Katrina hearings...

[URL=rtsp://video.c-span.org/project/hur/hur120605_evacuees2.rm]Click Here[/URL]

Things that make you go hmmmmm...

Sorry... sometimes I get

Sorry... sometimes I get mixed up between HTML, and BBCode...

Katrina Witnesses

Sorry again... HERE is the

Sorry again... HERE is the interesting testimony...

The Interesting Testimony From The Witnesses At The Katrina Hearings

A bad news, tho not

A bad news, tho not surprising at all:
Jay Hernandez Pulls Back Curtain On Oliver Stone's 9/11 Movie
Actor promises there won't be any conspiracy theories involved.

(except the official one, of course..)

Hope you all read

and this

U.S. Senator Mark Dayton I

U.S. Senator Mark Dayton

I watched Senator Mark Dayton's appearance yesterday on C-SPAN...

Click Here

He may have had doubts about 9/11 in the past, but he's certainly not voicing them now. In fact, it appears he doesn't think Bush should be impeached?

Dayton is a Yale graduate, I'd even go so far as to speculate that he is Skull and Bones.

All the top echelon criminals have Yale pedigrees.