Carol Brouillet For Congress
Carol is running as a member of the Green Party in Palo Alto. Please vote if you're in the area.
http://www.yourbbsucks.com/forum/showthread.php?t=8034
The big question for activists these days is: "How can I make a real difference?". In all too many cases, we are left the with the conclusion that we must do "something", even if we don't imagine we'll change anything. Carol Brouillet is one activist who brings a sensible strategic perspective to her effective on-the-ground organizing. She looks for points of leverage, where her initiatives are most likely to bear fruit.
...
More recently, Carol has been focusing her considerable energy on exposing the lies and cover-ups surrounding the events of 911. And again, this choice is backed by a strategic perspective: the whole Bush program, with all of its excesses and failures, is supported entirely by the official story surrounding 911. If somehow the public could see through that myth, and realize who the real perpetrators are, then the whole Bush house of cards would come tumbling down.Like many who have examined the extensive material available on 911, Carol finds the evidence for official complicity to be quite clear and beyond the shadow of doubt. The problem that remains is to get that evidence in front of the American people, and the people of the world. That's what the "911 Truth Movement" is about: creating public forums, and seeking media outlets, to get the evidence "out there".
The main home page of the movement is titled "911Truth.org", and their website (http://www.911truth.org/)provides links to the many sources of 911 information and research. The movement has a Northern California chapter (http://www.sf911truth.org/). Carol is very active in this chapter, and maintains her own web page in support (http://www.communitycurrency.org/Donate.html).
...
Carol's own documentary, "Behind Every Terrorist is a Bush", is a celebration of this truth movement, and an inspiration to movement activists. The documentary shows us highlights from a 911 Inquiry that Carol organized in San Francisco, with gutsy entertainers and nationally-known speakers. We see an outline of the evidence - enough to whet our appetites for the other DVDs - but the real "message" of the documentary is about the movement itself: its human face, its wide variety, its dedication to exposing the lies, its
humor. A more detailed description, with a list of the presentations, can be found at:
http://www.communitycurrency.org/9-11oakland.html#BET
...
Description of this and other 911-related DVDs:
http://www.communitycurrency.org/9-11oakland.html
- Login to post comments
"Anarchism is like
"Anarchism is like communism. It might look good in theory, but in the real world it is a disaster."
In the real world, libertarian anarchism works. In the real world, government is the disaster.
For more on this, see my below article:
"Jesus Is an Anarchist," James Redford, revised and expanded edition, November 9, 2005:
http://www.geocities.com/vonchloride/anarchist-jesus.pdf
http://www.yourbbsucks.com/fo
http://www.yourbbsucks.com/forum/showthread.php?t=8037
No, please do not vote.
No, please do not vote. Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on what to have for lunch, and the purest form of democracy in action is the lynch-mob.
Democracy is tyranny.
We are not going to achieve liberty by voting. At that can be achieved via said action is slavery.
You can't win in a rigged game at any rate. The thing to do is to not promote the rigged game in the first place. That is, do not even play the rigged game to begin with.
Rather, the achievement of liberty requires education. And when the populace has been educated to the required extent then voting will not matter.
In short, educate your neighbors, friends, and coworkers to the truth.
For more on this, see my below article, first published at Anti-State.com:
"Jesus Is an Anarchist," James Redford, revised and expanded edition, November 9, 2005:
http://www.geocities.com/vonchloride/anarchist-jesus.pdf
From my previous comment in
From my previous comment in this thread:
""
At that can be achieved via said action is slavery.
""
That should instead read "All that can be achieved via said action is slavery."
At the very least, we need a
At the very least, we need a national voting system with independent random verification.
What we got now is the Rube Goldberg voting system.
And the pundits wax eloquently about why the Dems can't win the presidential election even though the Dems won in 2000 and 2004 although were not given the trophy.
There is alot of science to substantiate this.
Concerning the science that
Concerning the science that you mention, Edward Rynearson, with the black-box electronic voting, the ruling elite can simply punch in any numbers that they want, as they did in the 2004 U.S. Presidential election (of which the actual winner, Bonesman Kerry, was more than happy to roll over for his good buddies, the Bushes):
"Science proves that vote fraud is real!," Joseph Cannon, April 2, 2005:
http://cannonfire.blogspot.com/2005/04/science-proves-that-vote-fraud-is...
"Analysis of the 2004 Presidential Election Exit Poll Discrepancies," Josh Mitteldorf, Ph.D., Kathy Dopp, MS mathematics, Steven F. Freeman, Ph.D., Prof. Brian Joiner, Prof. Frank Stenger, Prof. Richard G. Sheehan, Paul F. Velleman, Ph.D. Associate Professor, Victoria Lovegren, Ph.D. Lecturer, Campbell B. Read, Ph.D. Professor Emeritus, Jonathan Simon, Ron Baiman, Bruce O'Dell, US Count Votes' National Election Data Archive Project, March 31, 2005:
http://uscountvotes.org/ucvAnalysis/US/Exit_Polls_2004_Edison-Mitofsky.pdf
"The Unexplained Exit Poll Discrepancy," Steven F. Freeman, Ph.D., University of Pennsylvania, November 11, 2004:
http://www.buzzflash.com/alerts/04/11/Unexplained_exit_poll_discrep_v00l...
In "The Unexplained Exit Poll Discrepancy," Dr. Steven F. Freeman says:
"As much as we can say in social science that something is impossible, it is impossible that the discrepancies between predicted and actual vote counts in the three critical battleground states [Ohio, Florida, and Pennsylvania] of the 2004 election could have been due to chance or random error."
The odds of those exit poll statistical anomalies occurring by chance are, according to Dr. Freeman, "250,000,000 to one."
###############
But the existential problem isn't corruption with the voting system. The problem is the very notion that our rights are up for a vote.
My rights are not up for a vote. If 100% of the population wanted to kill me--save for me--that would still not make it right. If the white majority wanted to kill all blacks that would not make it right.
Like I said previously, which obviously some here are having a hard time comprehending: democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on what to have for lunch, and the purest form of democracy in action is the lynch-mob.
People are so cought-up on democracy because the ruling elite have indoctrinated them since birth that democracy represents some sort wonderful goal that we must all work hard to strive for. But democracy is tyranny.
What we should strive for is *liberty*! The right of liberty is not subject to any person's or people's vote, but is a right which we all have no matter how many people are against us.
For more on this, see my below article, first published at Anti-State.com:
"Jesus Is an Anarchist," James Redford, revised and expanded edition, November 9, 2005:
http://www.geocities.com/vonchloride/anarchist-jesus.pdf
last nights episode of "24"
last nights episode of "24" was amazing.the presidents chief advisor Walt Cummings was caught staging a terror attack in central asia as a means to prove there is WMD over there, and that we need to go to war for oil and profit. i forget his exact words, but it sounded just like something out of a PNAC manifesto.you should seriously consider putting up the clip when Walt Cummings is explaining his reasoning to the president as to why he would engage in false-flag terrorism.the clip is amazing.here is the scene:12:21 P.M.
Logan wonders whether sending Martha away is the right solution. Cummings lets him know that Jack is coming to the retreat to meet with Novick. Jack plans to accuse Cummings of helping the terrorists acquire the nerve gas. Cummings then confesses to the President that he leaked information to the terrorists about the location of the nerve gas. Logan is outraged, but CummingsÂ’ intent was to make the separatists think they will use it against the Russians. The nerve gas will never reach Russian soil because detonators will be triggered once the terrorists landed at their home base. This would prove the existence of weapons of mass destruction in Central Asia. It will allow America to increase its military presence in the area and guarantee the flow of oil.
Chris i agree with you, but
Chris i agree with you, but most people who see this episode and don't believe they are being lied to will use this to say, "ah well, it's just fiction so it will never happen in real life" and possibly become even more attached to the official conspiracy.
i have a new roommate who believes there is something fishy going on with the pentagon but doesn't believe anything else i say about anything else related to that day....which is weird because the pentagon is one of those hotly contested parts of 9-11.
i'm not giving up on turning him, but the deck is stacked. i am trying to get him to watch 9-11 eyewitness, but he already believes that there were explosions going on inside the WTC because, "well, it was hit by a plane so of course there would be explosions going on all over" but he still doesn't want to try to explain the free fall collapses or WTC 7 collapse, so i have a chance.
did you see last nights
did you see last nights episode though? it was amazing, my jaw dropped when Cummings went into his rationale for staging a terror attack. seriously, you gotta see the clip of him explaining himself to the president, it was eerily familiar.....
Kudos to you for bringing
Kudos to you for bringing Carol's campaign to the attention of your readers.
But the comments posted above by James Redford calling on people to not vote are absolutely ridiculous. To follow this idea would only insure that the same power-elite would stay in control for the next 500 years.
Anarchism is like communism. It might look good in theory, but in the real world it is a disaster.
Contesting elections and voting is one of the most important ways we have to educate people, to change things and to assert the popular will.
What Carol Brouillet is doing in the 14th District of California, is very important, and deserves the support of us all.
The Green Party endorses
The Green Party endorses 9/11 truth. That is why Carol is running. As a member of her San Francisco 9/11 truth group I can tell you first hand there isn't anyone who works harder at getting 9/11 truth out there. Win or loose, she deserves our support. I have been a Democrat all my life. I have decided to switch to the Green Party. The Democrats no longer represent what I believe in. The Green Party does.
It takes a lot of nerve to
It takes a lot of nerve to to run for congress. Lots of public speaking, debates, speaking in front of the camera,etc.
Any one of us can run for congress and use it as a platform to spread the truth, here we have someone actually doing it. Get out and vote, even if you have lost faith in the system, support your fellow activists.
Go Green or go home.
Carol did not keep her word
Carol did not keep her word to me regarding a small thing she said she would do in support of truth about 9/11, and when I brought this up to her privately months and months and months later (my patience is not infinite), she smeared (suggested lies about) me, using a great example of aspersion-casting yellow journalism, on her web site.
Between that and her obvious connections to, and selective support of, that large ring of self-proclaimed "911truth" conventional-explanation (half-truth) web sites, and opposition to 911 sites which do not "toe the party line", the best I can say about Carol is that she might fit right in on Captiol Hill.
________________________________________