"Jon..where is the link to suggest that they had plans to go to iraq and afghanistan b4 9/11"

duuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuude...

Where ISN'T there a link...

Look at the PNAC, and their obsession with invading Iraq. Look at Paul O'Neill who said the first principals meeting after his inauguration was about "Finding a way" to invade Iraq. July 2001, the foreign secretary of Pakistan was told that Afghanistan would be invaded in October 2001.

FYI. Opie & Anthony blasted Dylan again this morning.

Anyone know Dylan's phone #? Send me an email with it if you do, I wanna make sure this lawyer gets in touch with him.

I sent him a couple of emails, but I know how much email these guys get, so he might have missed it.

She's got quite a lineup. Greg Palast is on tomorrow and Richard Andrew Grove again for an interview on the 4th.

The first Grove interview was said to be in the "Free Show" link for a week, so I assume that means Griffin's won't replace it.

I may subscribe to hear it, but then I don't know if it's right to redistribute it. Important stuff like this shouldn't be subscription only, imo.

Ahmadinejad interviewed by Spiegel regarding his letter to Bush:
http://service.spiegel.de/cache/international/0,1518,418660-2,00.html

SPIEGEL: This letter to the American president includes a passage about Sept. 11, 2001. The quote: "How could such an operation be planned and implemented without the coordination with secret and security services or without the far-reaching infiltration of these services?" Your statements always include so many innuendos. What is that supposed to mean? Did the CIA help Mohammed Atta and the other 18 terrorists conduct their attacks?

Ahmadinejad: No, that's not what I meant. We think that they should just say who is to blame. They should not use Sept. 11 as an excuse to launch a military attack against the Middle East. They should take those who are responsible for the attacks to court. We're not opposed to that; we condemned the attacks. We condemn any attack against innocent people.

good stuff Jon, i hate those assholes. O&A cry so much about Howard Stern its pathetic. thats all they do is take jabs at Stern.and FYI, Norton is a "true believer" in the "war on terror". the guy is hopeless, i heard him bashing the hell out of muslims talking about the usual "they chop off heads", "im for the war" bullshit. he sounds like a Fox News talking head spewing all the usual talking points when he attempts to speak on politics.fuck O&A.and fuck Norton most of all.

The first time I was on, I was a fan. If I'm ever on again, it's going to be a different story.

The Supreme Court Has Made It Harder For Whistleblowers To Sue For Retaliation

Let's not forget that they're also trying to take away the pensions of those who choose to blow the whistle.

Let's also not forget how DANGEROUS it is to be a whistleblower.

Where are all of those bastards who repeatedly ask, "Why hasn't anyone spoken up?"

get um jon!!! HAHAH!!!

Wired bombs? There aren't radio-controlled or other wireless bombs that can be hidden in walls, ceilings, etc.? Moreover, if 1 plane "didn't make it", they would have just removed said bombs (or blamed them on Osama) and disposed of them as they did all the other evidence.

Bush had those plans on his desk 9/9/2001. Look at Dick Cheney's secretive Energy Task Force, the documentation we've been able to get. On the DAY of 9/11, Rumsfeld was looking for ways to tie 9/11 to Iraq even though his subordinates indicated the case was weak.

Opie and Anthony had people fornicate in a Catholic church...and they have the gall to blindly accept the neocon lies of 9/11? Noone should take these goons seriously.

No one should take them seriously, but they have a pretty big audience considering they took over Howard's slot. If they're going to bash 9/11 Truth, regardless of the aspect, then they're going to hear about it.

"(what if one plane didnt make it? then there is a standing tower full of fucking wired bombs)"

What, like building 7??? He hit the nail right on the head. He described building 7 exactly.

He just made your point for you Jon, stick it to him.

Agreed somebigguy. Could be the "Shanksville Shootdown" was headed for WTC7? Just a wild guess....

His response...

hardcore republican? you need to listen a little better, i'm afraid. and EVERY single theory they have i have heard explained. every one. you forgot to mention the planes landing in ohio and somewhere else. what about that one?

My response...

Whatever the hell you are, you're been "supportive" of the war in the past, and I listen to you guys every morning now that you're back on "Free FM".

And what did I say? I said to STOP looking at the theories, and to start looking at the facts.

Why did you completely ignore what I said about Sibel?

STOP LOOKING AT THE THEORIES, AND START LOOKING AT THE FACTS.

Start at www.cooperativeresearch.org

Jon

i love it Jon, keep it up. and Norton is lying when he says he isnt republican. ive heard enough of that show to know that he buys the whole "war on terror" hook,line and sinker.you should ask him why he falls for the Fox News talking points so easily.

and ask him to explain how WTC7 fell, because the government didnt do it for us.maybe he can.

Gringos! WHAT ARE YOU?

a Banana Republic?

70 million sheeple suspect something,
and you cannot action anything that sticks?

Oh, wait until we have 90 million.

Maybe 150 million before some Attorney signs an arrest warrant for some DIA black-op.

Maybe 250 million before the newspapers will publish an exposé on it. (who needs newspapers then?)

911 truthlings... all your meetings are great events for spooks to meet you all. (why not get recruited and then turn-coat?)

in short:

How about a national internet-televised court-room soap -- free to all broadcasters worldwide -- that tries to convict the DIA for 911 in absentia? William Pepper did this WITHOUT INTERNET (MLK), and the mock-trial had the effect that WITNESSES came out of the woodwork.

I propose:

location: St Marks? .. hmm maybe better the UN lobby, or whatever, comfortable carpeted, climatised. -> safe for the duration -> can become a museum afterwards -> has balconies for TV cameras -> dry-sound-no-reverbation

chief judge: John Judge (you know. he has authority-deep-voice, and has a cool last name, think hollywood!)

other judges: Old guys look good. Morgan, Ray McGovern, Zinn, and a sex-bomb in skimpy clothes. (thats why socialism lost, too little tittilation!)

jury: 24 random homeless people, the uglier the better. Maybe we could trial smell-TV for the first time.
PLEASE SUGGEST SUITABLE BABES.

Strict order in the courtroom is paramount, hence we need some bouncers (Hells Angels in full regalia!). Judge has the final word, no argument.

A coast guard guy I've been in conversations with on Myspace really enjoyed EGLS....

but what made me angry was the part of his response that goes:

"In the movie it asked 'would you really want to know?'...to be honest...no"

This is the quintessence of the mindset we are dealing with.

He and I are getting into it now.

His response...

yes, i have been supportive of the war in the past. again, every fact i've heard raised i've heard explained. name me one or two facts you consider very convincing. and you cant blow off the missle nonsense or the controlled explosion, those are they biggest ones he has

My response...

Jim... I'm NOT talking about "Loose Change". Get your mind off Loose Change.

Ok... here are a few facts for you to digest.

Sibel Edmonds, the most gagged person/whistleblower in history said, the following quotes

"The American public have not heard who is the real culprit behind 9/11"

"once this issue gets to be...investigated, you will be seeing certain [American] people that we know from this country standing trial; and they will be prosecuted criminally"

"There is direct evidence involving no more than ten American names that I recognized"

Also, go ask Porter Goss, Bob Graham, and John Kyl why they were having breakfast on the morning of 9/11 with Lt. General Mahmoud Ahmad of the Pakistani ISI, a man alleged to have ordered $100,000 wire transferred to Mohammad Atta.

Also, answer me this simple question Jim...

How did the Pentagon, which sits in the MOST defended airspace in the world, and is itself, one of the MOST defended buildings in the world, manage to get hit by Flight 77 34 minutes AFTER the SECOND tower was hit? Cause you know, AFTER the SECOND tower was hit, everyone in the world knew we were "under attack", and yet, no planes were scrambled until AFTER the Pentagon was hit according to General Myers.

The second part to that question. why did the 9/11 Commission completely omit Transportation Secretary Norman Mineta's testimony from their final report? You remember his testimony don't you? The testimony that said he and Dick Cheney watched Flight 77 for at least 50 miles until it hit the Pentagon.

How can that be? The Pentagon was hit at 9:37, and the 9/11 Report says that Dick Cheney didn't arrive at the PEOC until 9:58.

Oh, that's right. Norman Mineta said he arrived at the PEOC by 9:20, and Dick Cheney was already there.

NO WONDER the 9/11 Report omitted his testimony.

I bet you've never even heard of this before.

Jon

haha, i love it.

I want to see how he responds.

I just sent him this...

Read this Jim, and tell me why this is acceptable.

http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20051128144916707

Jon

yeah Jon...in my experience, the debates usually end when the Mineta video gets tossed into it.

Jim Norton And I Are Having Words...

Norton is typical. if CNN doesnt cover it endlessly, it just didnt happen to him.remember the Downing Street Memo? most americans didnt hear of that until the leftwing blogosphere shoved it down their throats and forced the MSM to cover it.the DSM case proves a lot about what DOESNT get reported on. 9/11 is obviously the main untouchable.

A guy my friend works with and he were debating 911 and when my friend brought up Mineta's testimony the guy goes "you can't believe everything you read, how do you know it's accurate?"

My friend replies "Because he said it live on CSPAN in front of the 9/11 Commission"

That pretty much stopped the opponent in his tracks.

and poor Jimmy Norton needs someone like Jon to hold his hand and teach him how to do basic research. people like Norton expect the media to tell them everything. fucking tool most likely has 100% trust in the media.

it doesnt take some huge conspiracy to pull off something like 9/11. it only takes a complicit media, and fucking gullible morons like Norton who blindly trust them.

give em hell Jon, i hate that son of a bitch with a passion. O&A are just Howard wannabes and jealous tools, but Norton is just retarded scum.hes so absolutist too, thats what makes it really bad.

Agreed somebigguy. Could be the "Shanksville Shootdown" was headed for WTC7? Just a wild guess....
maddog | Homepage | 05.30.06 - 4:04 pm | #

Another wild guess is the airliner that was grounded 9/11 morning, in which some "Arab-looking" male passangers threw a fit before storming off the plane. (Perhaps this was the WTC-7 flight?)

I will be amazed if anyone can get those Opie & Anthony guys to see any 9/11 truth. O & A are just too belligerent and have very short attention spans to debunk something with this level of complexity. Same thing goes for most of their fans.

No arabs on flights???

http://www.sierratimes.com/03/07/02/article_tro.htm

Norton is not an idiot.

He just has to be shown the right things.

Hey Jon those e-mail addresses for opie and anthony didnt work.

Their mailboxes are full.

lol Jon I cant believe you'd go on the radio and talk to those idiots. People like that only know one thing: meaningless insults. The best thing to do with them is simply to attack attack attack. Call them names. Do whatever it is that they do only 10x over till they pull you off the air. Nothing else can be more effective for their idiot audience. So insult them. That's all they know and it's all that will get a rise out of them. Hell it might even convert some of them. People like that tend to follow and respect the biggest pit bull in the room.

Their idiot audience will accept that sort of thing from the talk show host they listen to. But if someone else they dont know comes on the show with the same tactic aimed at the host it will backfire.

Griffin mp3 anyone ??????

No shit? WTF? :)