Here is my list of favorite freeway blog ideas:

  9/11 = INSIDE JOB
  9/11 TRUTH
  9/11 TRUTH NOW!!!
  9/11 = FALSE FLAG TERROR
  GOOGLE 9/11 TRUTH
  GOOGLE WTC7
  GOOGLE LOOSE CHANGE
  QUESTION 9/11
  EXPOSE 9/11
  WTC7 = SMOKING GUN

Infowars has now put up an article on the Ellsberg interview. I've revised the Ellsberg blog -- go back and look.

Freeway blogging: the guy, the concept, and especially the video, rock.

GW, great stuff about Ellsburg!

I post the following on the other thread, so forgive me if this is a repeat for you. It's my letter to Common Dreams regarding their current publishing of a 9/11 hit piece.

Dear Editor,

You do your readers a big disservice by featuring a viewpoint on 9/11 truth that's essentially a hit piece -- full of skewed logic and speculation, not to mention name calling ("pathetic lunatics") and absurd conclusions about 9/11 truth being a partisan issue.

Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy?
http://www.commondreams.org/views06/0718-26.htm

You offer NO BALANCE by publishing this piece. Are you really that naïve on this subject to realize that there are many respectable and reputable 9/11 researchers available who would gladly take issue with the viewpoint of this article? And, it's not just about viewpoints any longer, I might add. Professor Steven Jones has scientific PROOF that thermate was used to bring down the WTC towers.... if the media would even bother to look. No, instead, Common Dreams falls into the Rovian trap that you'll be labeled "conspiracy theorists" and therefore lose credibility. In fact, you are being a "good German" by falling into that trap and your readers are being left behind.

The premise of this piece to somehow paint 911 truth as a partisan issue is so far off the mark that it's pathetically ignorant. Those of us who have looked carefully at the evidence have realized one big truth -- both parties are guilty of covering up this issue. There certainly haven't been any Democrats willing to stand up and speak the truth or merely even ask the big questions, other than the honorable Cynthia McKinney.

Perhaps you need to re-read the following article, published on Common Dreams last year, and learn from it:

Threshold Fears and Unanswered Questions About 9/11
http://www.commondreams.org/views05/0306-23.htm

"Overall concerns with the official version of 9/11 have been published and discussed by scholars and writers around the world including: Jim Mars, Nafeez Ahmed, Michael Ruppert, Cynthia McKinney, Barrie Zwicker, Webster Tarpley, Michel Chossudovsky and many others. The response to most has been to label these discussions as conspiracy theories unworthy of media coverage or further review. Pursuit of a critical analysis of these questions is undermined by the psychological barrier about 9/11 issues as threshold concepts - too awful to even consider."

The editors at Common Dreams should offer BALANCE. And, if you consider the "Threshold Fears" piece from a year ago as balance, then you're sorely mistaken, and your readers are not being presented with legitimate, scientific viewpoints on 9/11. That's shameful, in my opinion. Just remember that the truth will out, and Common Dreams will be left behind when that happens.

Respectfully,

CK

Everyone, THIS IS HUGE!

Check this out about Val McClatchey's famous mushroom cloud photo:

http://killtown.blogspot.com/2006/07/val-mcclatchey-photo-more-smoking-g...

PLEASE give this a post on this site!!!

I've started a thread at Daily Kos about Ellsberg: http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/7/19/14515/9803

So far, not much activity.

I don't begrudge Cindy Sheehan, even though I might be disappointed that she won't question 9/11 publicly.

Hey maddog, I was just about to post that. It sucks. Did you see the message that came with it, from other folks in her group?

On 7/18/06, Barbara From campcaseyalumni@yahoogroups.com wrote:
WE ARE NOT, REPEAT, NOT, 9-11 RESEARCHERS

At the risk of offending you (plural), the majority of us are not into the 9-11 investigations and would really appreciate it if you would please stop using the CAMPCASEYALUMNI for your messages. There are plenty of sites devoted to your efforts.

The 9-11 victims are dead! Our soldiers are dying, today, and every day. This is now. We can revisit your issue after we get our troops home. Y'all are sucking all the energy out of the antiwar movement and it is VERY DETREMENTAL to what we are trying to do.

We all have things that interest us, other than ending the war. Most of us pursue those things on our own. I appreciate your (plural) passion but believe me when I say that this 9-11 obsession is not helping us get our troops home.

Please stop usurping the CAMPCASEY site for your personal agendas.

Some of us are working our asses off 24/7 on ending the war and y'all are not supporting us or helping by what you are doing on this site. There are 50 other groups where you can post. Give us back our site.

It seems to me that Crawford this August is going to be ISO, 9-11 ers and at least one person who was already thrown out once.

Nothing personal but please, keep your 9-11 stuff someplace else and let us move forward with our work.

barbar, hannah and patrick

Basically, my instinct is just to leave these people alone. However, I'm concerned that there was some co-planning of an event in DC for 9/11 and that now seems like a very bad idea.

If I were to respond to them, it would be to clarify the motivations behind 9/11 truth -- that is, it's not just about the people who died that day, it's about the idea that 9/11 provided the pretext for the Iraq war AND the domestic war on our civil liberties. I mean, duh.

Well, if there are areas and events that are specifically Camp Casey, I can respect that. But, if they think they get the spotlight on 9/11 or anything, fuk 'em.

Sheehan should realize the only reason we are in this war is because of 9/11 lies.

I never knew this:

July 19, 2006 -- MAGGIE Gyllenhaal rubbed reporters the wrong way at the junket for Oliver Stone's "World Trade Center" at the Regency the other day. Still smarting from the reaction to her 2001 comments - "I think America has done reprehensible things and is responsible in some way [for 9/11]" - she steered clear of politics. But one journo called her "a nightmare" because she also refused to discuss her pregnancy. Meanwhile, co-star Nicolas Cage was finished when "an idiot from Sweden asked him about the 'controversy' of his being married to a much younger lady [Alice Kim]."

It sure sounds like Maggie Gyllenhaal is a truther.
From
http://www.nypost.com/gossip/pagesix/touchy_subjects_pagesix_.htm

"I don't begrudge Cindy Sheehan, even though I might be disappointed that she won't question 9/11 publicly."........I sure do.

Sheenhan is afraid of being labeled one of "those people". a "conspiracy theorists". shes a coward in my book.speaking out on the Iraq war is good and all, but lets address the lies that brought us that war.

Everyone, THIS IS HUGE!

Check this out about Val McClatchey's famous mushroom cloud photo:

http://killtown.blogspot.com/200...oking- guns.html

PLEASE give this a post on this site!!!
Killtown | Homepage | 07.19.06 - 3:22 pm | #
i agree, this deserves its own thread.

http://killtown.blogspot.com/2006/07/val-mcclatchey-photo-more-smoking-g...

Fox News analyst compares Israelis to Nazis
Bevelacqua tells O'Reilly Jewish state ruthless in Lebanon

WorldNetDaily | July 18, 2006

Fox News military analyst Maj. Bob Bevelacqua, a former Green Beret, appearing tonight on "The O'Reilly Factor," compared Israeli actions in Lebanon and Gaza with Nazi actions in Russia during World War II.

Bevelacqua, a long-time Fox News contributor, said the Israelis were unwilling to compromise in their conflict with Hamas in Gaza and Hezbollah in southern Lebanon. He denied that the Israelis willingly evacuated from Gaza and Lebanon.

"Saying the Israelis pulled out of Lebanon is like saying the Nazis pulled out of Moscow," he said. "They invaded Lebanon. They invaded Gaza. They take homes and then they give them back. And they expect some type of great recognition."

http://www.infowars.com/articles/ww3/fox_news_analyst_compares_israelis_...

a Fox News analyst making sense? this guy is so gonna get fired.......

Samuel D. Danner

Danner is an electrician, railroad engineer, and pilot who was at the Pentagon on 9/11 and reportedly witnessed a Global Hawk plane hit the building.

somebody PLEASE listen to this show today...............

http://www.infowars.com/

i've asked this before and never received a satisfactory response... Last time i think i asked "Did Dr. Jones take the slow boat to China" to get WTC metal samples to look for thermate? Where did the sample come from and where are his results posted?

While i'm asking stuff...does anyone know of good links to respond to the following:

"all I'm looking for is a few experts to corroborate the Avery
version of events--a structural engineer to confirm that there is no way
that pillars would collapse, a demolitions expert to verify that explosions
could not have been caused by something other than an incendiary device, an
crash investigator to explain that the hole could not have come from an
airplane."

anyone know of official 'experts' to back up these claims who have the right credentials, ala Kevin Ryan or (at one point) Val RAmero?

thanks!

Dr. Jones received some of the metal samples from erected 9-11 memorials.

>Check this out about Val >McClatchey's >famous mushroom cloud >photo:

If it's really a fake, it would be one more example of big mysteries having simple explanations.
- strange smoke cloud - made with Photoshop
- WTC7 collapse 'like' c.d. - is was a c.d.
- hijackers getting U.S. military training - inside job

"strange smoke cloud - made with Photoshop"

I think a lot of the pentagon photos were photoshopped.

>Dr. Jones received some of the metal >samples from erected 9-11 memorials.
>MediaPuppet | 07.19.06 - 4:23 pm | #

There's the stories about what was buried at the Fresh Kills landfill:

http://www.silive.com/news/advance/index.ssf?/base/news/1151500672321320...

I wonder what could be still there to be examined. William Rodriguez said something about the WTC plane parts having gone there.

Wow,Ihad just decided yesterday that if I wasn't able to get my local cable access channel to show Loose Change 2E and 911 Revisited,that I was going to start freeway blogging.And then I decided I'm going to start freeway blogging
anyway,and today...this little video.

"I wonder what could be still there to be examined"?

I aslo read somewhere that some of the debris may have been dumped in the sea off the East coast for man-made reefs.

On the topic of freeway blogging, I would like to know what people think the best 911 truth sayings would be to do this with.

Obviously, there is:
   "9/11 = INSIDE JOB."

What other short statements do you think would be effective 911 truth freeway blogs?

GW-
Good to see someone is still fighting the good fight over at Daily Kos. It'd be great if more people who post regularly on this site could post every once in a while over there.

Whoa, Randkiller, W A Y over the top on Cindy Sheehan.

What's the punchline to that joke about the wife who catches his husband in bed with another woman? I believe the husband says "Baby, don't believe your lying eyes!"

That sums up the WTC 7 collapse pretty nicely for me. After watching video upon video of the collapse it becomes more patently obvious that WTC7 was... as Silverstein calls it, "pulled". Anybody who has seen the video and still denies this patently obvious demolition, are still believing their lying eyes. They don't want to believe their government cheated on them.

K.

Killtown,
here is an short analyse i made on your blog, what do you think guys? :

don't forget that the wind is blowing from N-W to S-E ! It could be possible that the smoke cloud simply moved.
But even if the wind bring the smoke cloud there, it still prove the conspiracy, here is why:

The smoke is perfectly straight up in the air, this mean(if there is wind) that the entire smoke colum was created at the same time (so from a bomb) or else the top part of the smoke would have started to move to the left a bit before the bottom of the
colum if the fire was really created by a jet fuel (the fuel burn longer and thust create smoke for a longer time). We can really see the different angle os the smoke colum in this photo you provided : plume-comparison3.0.jpg

I think you should add this in your investigation (and write it in a clearer way then me ;, what do you think?

Nicolas

More lies from that same US gov't junk-science site linked above:

The Attack on the Pentagon
Allegation: 9/11 Revealed suggests that American Airlines flight 77 was not hijacked and flown into the Pentagon but that, instead, “a drone Boeing 757 is used or a smaller, more manageable plane painted in American Airlines colors.”
Facts: This theory ignores the fact that the passenger and crew remains from American Airlines flight 77 were recovered at the Pentagon crash site. A team of more than 100 forensic specialists and others identified 184 of the 189 people who died in the Pentagon attack (125 from the Pentagon and 64 onboard American Airlines flight 77). All but one of the passengers onboard American Airlines flight 77 was positively identified as a match with DNA samples provided by the families of the crash victims, as reported in the Washington Post on November 21, 2001. This provides irrefutable proof that American Airlines flight 77, not a drone or other aircraft, crashed into the Pentagon on September 11.

Oh really? An airliner flying 530 mph exploded & smashed it's way through the Pentagon's outer walls, basically nothing left of it whatsoever, but organic matter of 63 of 64 passengers was obtained to produce DNA results??? I don't think so!!!

BTW RANDKILLER999, I never heard of Sheehan disrupting soldiers' funerals. You may be thinking of that family of fundamentalist-christian nutjobs out in the Midwest who I've seen doing that.

Chill out!

This is also from that same disinfo.gov site:

The structure below the level of collapse initiation offered minimal resistance to the falling building mass .... The potential energy released by the downward movement of the large building mass far exceeded the capacity of the intact structure below to absorb that ....

Since the stories below the level of collapse initiation provided little resistance to the tremendous energy released by the falling building mass, the building section above came down essentially in free fall .... As the stories below sequentially failed, the falling mass increased, further increasing the demand on the floors below, which were unable to arrest the moving mass.

"The stories below the level of collapse initiation provided little resistance..."

WHY? WHY? WHY?

This is one of those "do I laugh or do I cry?" things.

Yeah, buildings are designed to collapse like a chain of dominos! One part fails & some chain reaction brings all the rest down faster than a run-away train. LOL

TruthSearching, yes I think its really the State Dept. website:

http://alexa.com/search?q=http%3A%2F%2Fusinfo.state.gov%2Fmedia%2FArchiv...

Total bullshit junk-science on that gov't site!

Hey Maddog, that's interesting regarding Cindy Sheehan. This is what I feared, the 3 or 4 thousand or so Truthers that show up in DC on Sept. 11th will not be heard.

Everyone, go to Ground Zero no DC in September.

I am curious why Sheehan is more-or-less saying that 9/11 is "off limits." I mean, why can't I be anti-war and a 9/11 activist also?

Sheehan knows Bush is a boldfaced liar on Iraq, yet she assumes he is being honest about 9/11? I don't get it.

Is this REALLY the government's explanation?
truthsearching2006 | 07.19.06 - 7:07 pm | #

yeah it's basically a mirror of Popular Mechanics article

Google WTC7 is a good idea. There was an old guy at the Chicago conference that had a T-Shirt that said Google Loose Change.

Good stuff...

BUILDING 7 PROVES BUSH DID 911

see yall later

Rick and Dylan need to talk about their 911 plans to make sure they're not diluting the message or worse, appearing to split the movement..
I worry that in DC the anti-war brigade will outnumber the Truthers and dominate the MSM coverage

The Ground Zero event could be seen as 'not honoring the dead', so maybe it should be silent.

(Looks like my Shout for Truth idea ran into a problem...)

Looks like we could be upstaged by Sheehan of all people. Very odd.

@Anonymous: TOO MANY left or right anti war activists feel 9/11 is off limits or even crazy/tinfoil to consider. This is why coming from the left perspective, the leftgarekeeper mentality really upsets me. So guess what? Were just going to keep putting 9/11 truth in their face.

also, I am more than down for some Northern California guerrilla street action or flyering for 9/11 Truth.

OT, I'm watching 911 revisited for the first time.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1951610169657809939&q=9%2F11

I cannot fathom how anyone can doubt for one second that those towers were demolished.
I know the WMD theory is not popular, but nearly every eyewitness on the film talks about the explosions as BIG or HUGE. There's more than Thermite/Thermate in the mix.

Okay one more idea,
911 CONTROLLED DEMOLITION
I mean, why pull punches?It isn't as if there is any credible evidence anywhere that de-bunks the controlled demolition theory.

Oops that was supposed to be:
911 INSIDE JOB
WTC CONTROLLED DEMOLITION

Notes to unseasoned painters: The cheapest, fastest way to make letters is to use Kills in the spray can. We could have 3x the coverage by not if we didn't have to wait for that primer to day, or bother with box-size signs. You need to be saying it at 5x scale, like the fellow who did those wonderful banners throughout LA, protesting (9.7 per hour)killings on TV!