Adding to convince people about 9/11;Ask them questions in a manner that would make them curious.
Last year My daughter and her friend did a school project in which they asked people about hypothetical situations and how they think the Constitution would apply to the situation. some of these people got angry because they felt as if they were being interrogated.Others knew absolutely nothing at all about the Constitution.
Ask them about the Patriot Act.is there a reason why it was needed? Does it stop terrorism? If so,how? What did We need a Homeland security for? After all,we had a Department of Defense,An FBI, a DEA,a CIA,a NSA,and a FEMA,a Navy,an Army,Marines,and Airforce,Coast Guard,and National Guard,Norad,an FAA,and Nuclear Weapons.
But We needed a Homeland Security? Lots of New Orleans people can tell you how good this agency is(not).
Don't these two things alone make you wonder if it was needed to make sure people don't ask hard questions about the 9/11 Commision report and spying on our own citizens would be an indicator to how they justify these critical organizations and law?

Tell them to flounder in ignorance, it's kinda fun to watch.
It's a IQ test of sorts.

:lol:

9/11- Cui Bono?

Many believe that the US gov't is infalable and not capeable of false flag terrorism. Discuss 1898 Spanish American War - US Sinking of Maine blamed on Spain, Gulf of Tonkin as a pretext for Vietnam and Opp Northwoods. These are only the ones we KNOW about. Spend some time on "fromthewilderness.com" and learn that the war on drugs was a fabrication too.

Neo-cons think we need war to create a strong society. They like ambiguos enemies that can't be defeated and warrent expansion of military and gov't like a "war on terror".

Think about it. How does one wage "war on terror"? The very sentence is an oxymoron.

Stephen Colbert has a NEW FORUM -- POST 9/11 INFO TO MASS AUDIENCE OF
NEW PEOPLE. This is a GREAT opportunity to educate new people and get them
involved in the 9/11 truth seeking movement. Join the new forum below,
and urge your 9/11 contacts to do the same.

Join his new forum at: http://www.colbertnation.com/

If you don't have any 9/11 truth ammo at hand, there's plenty below you
can use:
TOP MILITARY, AERONAUTICS, PHYSICS, INTELLIGENCE EXPERTS SAYING "9/11
WAS AN INSIDE US GOVT. JOB TO FOOL AMERICANS INTO ENDLESS OIL WARS:

Former Chief Economist under George Bush, and professor at Texas A&M,

“Only professional demolition appears to account for the full range of
facts associated with the collapses of WTC 1 (North Tower), WTC 2 (South
Tower), and the much-overlooked collapse of the 47-story WTC building 7 at 5:21
pm on that fateful day . . . If demolition destroyed three steel
skyscrapers at the World Trade Center on 9/11, then the case for an "inside job" and a
government attack on America would be compelling.” -- Morgan Reynolds.

http://www.lewrockwell.com/reynolds/reynolds12.html

Former Director of Advanced Space Programs Development for the U.S.
Air Force, under President Reagan, and combat fighter pilot
“ . . . we’ve been lied to not only about the war, but about 9/11
itself. The Bush administration was warned. They were warned by the Clinton
Administration during the transition period, they were warned by the
intelligence agencies of eleven other nations, they were specifically
warned by one FBI agent that Moussawi was planning on flying a hijacked
airliner, “into the World Trade Center.” They ignored the warnings, more than
that, we have mounting evidence that _at least_, they made it impossible for
those planes to be intercepted.. . . My sisters and brothers, that is treason!
-- Col. Robert Bowman (Caltech Phd in aeronautics and nuclear
engineering).

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6900065571556128674

http://www.infowars.com/articles/sept11/bob_bowman_hanity_and_colmes.htm

Former CIA Intelligence Advisor to Reagan and George HW Bush and
founder of the Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity,

-- Ray McGovern is one of 100 signatories to a petition "which calls
for immediate public attention to unanswered questions that suggest that
people within the current administration may indeed have deliberately allowed
9/11 to happen, perhaps as a pretext for war."

http://www.americanscholarssymposium.org/info/presenters.htm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Researchers_questioning_the_official_accoun...

Former department head at UL (Underwriter Laboratories) the company
which certified the steel which went into the WTCs upon their construction,
and inspected it after the WTC collapses in 2001.
“ . . . the results of these tests appear to indicate that the
buildings should have easily withstood the thermal stress caused by pools of
burning jet fuel.. . . I think we can all agree that even un-fireproofed steel will not
melt until reaching red-hot temperatures of nearly 3000F (2). Why Dr. Brown
[Dr. Hyman Brown] would imply that 2000F would melt the high-grade steel
used in those buildings makes no sense at all.”-- Kevin Ryan

http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20041112144051451

Former assistant secretary of the U.S. Treasury Senior Research
Fellow at the Hoover Institution, Research Fellow at Stanford's
Independent Institute, and former associate editor of the Wall Street Journal,

"I guess the real story about 9/11 is about what the people are
actually saying. IÂ’ve gotten hundreds of emails in response to my columns and
many of them talk about not getting the truth from the government or the media
about what really happened at the World Trade Center. I know many qualified
engineers and scientists have said the WTC collapsed from explosives.
In fact, if you look at the manner in which it fell, you have to give
their conclusions credibility."-- Paul Craig Roberts

http://www.wanttoknow.info/050908insidejob911#roberts

Canadian National Defense Minister,

Why did the President just sit in the schoolroom when he heard the
news? Why did he not acknowledge that he already knew what was going on? As a
former Minister of National Defense, when the news came out I had to wonder.
Why did airplanes fly around for an hour and a half without interceptors
being scrambled from Andrews [Air Force Base]? . . . With a quick action
alert they should have been there in five minutes or ten minutes. If not, as
the Minister of National Defense, which in the United States is the
Secretary of Defense, I would want to say "why not?" . . . I think the inquiry has
been very shallow and superficial. And I would like to see a much tougher
more in-depth inquiry. . . . why were some members of the Bin Laden family
allowed to fly out of the United States? Why? There are so many
questions. What is going wrong here? Or was there something going wrong? How much
did they actually know? And you get into very deep territory . . . I would
like to see someone in a position of authority ask these questions and
insist on getting answers? At least to why some of the things happened that seem
to be, for an ordinary person, inexplicable. -- the Honourable Paul Hellyer

http://www.septembereleventh.org/kc/multimedia/movies/Hellyer.mov

Minister for the Environment, and Member of Parliament (United Kingdom)

Not a single fighter plane was scrambled to investigate from the US
Andrews airforce base, just 10 miles from Washington DC, until after the third
plane had hit the Pentagon at 9.38 am. Why not? There were standard FAA
intercept procedures for hijacked aircraft before 9/11. Between September 2000
and June 2001 the US military launched fighter aircraft on 67 occasions to
chase suspicious aircraft (AP, August 13 2002). It is a US legal requirement
that once an aircraft has moved significantly off its flight plan, fighter
planes are sent up to investigate.
. . . could US air security operations have been deliberately stood
down on September 11? If so, why, and on whose authority? The former US federal
crimes prosecutor, John Loftus, has said: "The information provided by
European intelligence services prior to 9/11 was so extensive that it
is no longer possible for either the CIA or FBI to assert a defence of
incompetence." -- Michael Meacher

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8274552561914055825

http://politics.guardian.co.uk/iraq/comment/0,12956,1036687,00.html

National Minister of Defense (Germany). Also, served as Minister of
Technology

Well, this is a big question because it happened in 2001 more than 60
times. That, fighter[s] went up to clear what has been done to airplanes
that showed some irregularities. At 9 11, four planes for two hours were
able to drive around, fly around even one hour in the direction going toward
the west and then turn around and then comeback. The military air force
was not able to interdict them. ItÂ’s [un]imaginable. And the whole story is
totally unclear what happened between the Federal Aviation Agency
(Administration) and NORAD . . . a covert operation. And this is a way
to influence, to brainwash the American people into long, long, ongoing
conflict with the Muslim world and all that you get to, for example the
oil companies, the last oil reserves which we need for the next decades
before the oil age is going out. -- Andreas Von Buelow

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8274552561914055825

Former Chief of Staff of the Russian armed forces, and chief of the
department for General affairs in the Soviet Union 's ministry of
Defense, General

“The organizers of [the nine eleven] attacks were the political and
business circles interested in destabilizing the world order . . . not satisfied
with the rhythm of the globalization process or its direction . . . only
secret services and their current chiefs (or retired staff with “influence
inside the state organizations”) [have the] ability to plan, organize and
conduct an operation of such magnitude. Generally, secret services create,
finance and control extremist organizations. Without the support of secret
services, these organizations cannot exist—let alone carry out operations of such
magnitude inside countries so well protected . . . Osama bin Laden and
‘Al Qaeda’ cannot be the organizers or the performers of the September 11
attacks . . . [they] do not have the necessary organization, resources
or leaders . . . [instead] a team of professionals had to be created and
the Arab kamikazes are just extras to mask the operation.” -- Leonid Ivashov

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=NIM20060...

Former MI6 British Counter Intelligence Officer,

"It is in fact a criminal offence to interfere with a crime scene and
yet in the case of 9/11 all the metal from the buildings is shipped out to
China, there are no forensications done on that metal. Now that to me suggests
they never wanted anybody to look at that metal because it was not going to
provide the evidence they wanted to show people that it was Al-Qaeda . . .
. . . They let it happen, they made it happen to create a trigger to be
able to allow the invasion of Afghanistan, the invasion of Iraq and of
course what they're trying to do now is the same thing with the invasion of
Iran and Syria . . . I've seen the results of terroristic explosions and so
on and no terrorist explosion has ever brought down a building. When the
IRA put something like a thousands tonnes of home-made explosives in front
of the Baltic Exchange building in Bishopsgate and let off the bomb, all
the glass came out, the building

I think any intro to 9-11 should include the censored Fox News report on Israeli spies with ties to 9-11 that are classified:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5fm0_7jVqcE&search=israel%20spies

And the nationally ignored reports out of Oklahoma City proving that there were sophisticated explosives found undetonated in the Murrah building:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vMXMo3Z0qms&eurl=

Both are like cold water to the 9-11 numbasses...

Hello Hybrten, Oslo, Norway

One thing that's been helpful to me is to look at 9/11 as a prosecutor or criminal investigator would.

In other words, who had the motive, the opportunity and who benefitted from the crime?

In this context, the Neocons beat al Queda as the obvious prime suspect.

All, thank you for your input!!! You've given plenty to think about ...

Hey Mssr. Jouet (Magmak1),

I heard a quote today by Morihei Ueshiba that was something like:

Don't stare at your opponent's weapons -- you'll become afraid. Don't stare into your opponent's eyes, you'll become hypnotized. Instead, focus most of your attention on what you want, and then you will be at peace sitting anywhere in the circle.

This is an clumsly paraphrase. Do you know the real quote? If so, please post at GeorgeWashington.blogspot.com so I get it.

Truthsearching: you can obviously pass this on . . .

Hey Mssr. Jouet (Magmak1),

I heard a quote today by Morihei Ueshiba that was something like:

Don't stare at your opponent's weapons -- you'll become afraid. Don't stare into your opponent's eyes, you'll become hypnotized. Instead, focus most of your attention on what you want, and then you will be at peace sitting anywhere in the circle.

This is an clumsly paraphrase. Do you know the real quote? If so, please post at GeorgeWashington.blogspot.com so I get it."

Roger, Wilco.

"Do not stare into the eyes of your opponent; he may mesmerize you. Do not fix your gaze on his sword; he may intimidate you. Do not focus on your opponent at all; he may absorb your energy. The essence of training is to bring your opponent completely into your sphere. Then you can stand just where you like."

Morihei Ueshiba, "The Art of Peace"

translated and edited by John Stevens

Shambhala Classics,
Boston and London 2002

-- --

P.S.: I didn't comment on this latest effort, but you do nice work. I'm a fan. I quote you and link to you often.

National Minister of Defense (Germany). Also, served as Minister of
Technology

I never was a Minister of Defense.

Stop parading this BS.

I think one of the key reasons people don't come around on 9/11 is because, in their minds, it is unprecedented. But if you look at what's going on in the world, all the death and destruction, 9/11 seems like small patatoes in comparison. Look at the number of people who have died from or will die from DU poisoning. Ever think about what that means? The US is using WMDs on it's own people. That's pretty sick. Couple that with the mass looting of the treasury and the dollar's loss of 40% over the last 5 years, and it's clear there are some very evil people running things.

People who know all those facts are easy to convince about 9/11. It's the people who call DU a "conspiracy theory"--those are the people who simply won't accept 9/11. They're just too far gone... brainwashed by too much Limbaugh and Fox news. It's all they know. They listen to that crap for hours each week and it just adds up and forms this wall of filth that shuts out all reason and logic.

The key to reaching them is taking down the wall of propaganda. Go after the Limbaughs and the Hannitys and push them back into the closets and the sewers where they belong.

and remember this: did anyone have to "convince" you about 9/11? Or were you "drawn" to it? I believe everyone will be drawn to it, if they can only undo the years of right wing media poisoning. It's like being in an alcoholic haze...

This being a consumerist society, we know that people like money. So when you tell them that unless they are making 40% more now than they were in 2000, they are being left behind by BushCo's greedy economic policy. That should anger anyone who works for a living. For many, that will be all the proof you need to convince someone that their beloved reich wing information sources have been lying their asses off. Once someone fully realizes that, 9/11 truth will present itself to them like the baby in this photo:

http://www.coolopticalillusions.com/eye-tricks/optic-pictures/baby_illus...

I also posted this in the DU dungeon

Would you expect a modern building to fall apart into pieces?

Expect that it would come apart in the time it would fall with nothing resisting its collapse?

Could you discern the difference between a building falling apart and being blown-up?

Should the buildings insides eject up and arch out further than the buildings own width?

Would you expect the building to turn to dust when it hit the ground or where it started to fall from?

What if the only knowledge you had of buildings coming down was controlled demolition?

Are you certain you would know the difference when seeing a building perpetuating its own collapse?

You may know that steel can melt but do you understand what it takes for 110 floors of it to fall apart?

When you think of a building falling apart does it crumble away or does it ride the wave of what itÂ’s running into bellow?

Would you expect the ground to shake before, as it collapsed, or when it collided with the ground?

What would you think of pools of liquefied steal found in the foundations a month later?

You still believe in the conservation of energy donÂ’t you?

Are you aware that scientist can only get steal to melt with a carbon fuel, such as kerosene and its cousins like jet fuel in laboratory conditions?

Where else have you seen a building collapse into a pile 4% of its original height without being demolished?

If a building fell apart like a house of cards would it seem odd to you?

How about if three buildings fell apart like houses of cards within 12 hours and a couple of hundred feet of each other?

And if all three accelerated as if nothing bellow was still holding them up, would you think that odd?

Does it sound right to you that a building can collapse on its own in nearly the time a golf ball would fall with nothing bellow it?

If three fell right down atop of their own foundations as if nothing bellow was even their, could you tell?

What if no one took the time to prove why three buildings collapsed to their foundations?
Could you believe just any reason for the cause and why they collapsed?

Even if all available evidence pointed in other directions, would you question news people telling you different?

Have you let your emotions get the better of your understanding?

What if for a year after all evidence was kept from the public and the only people describing what occurred did so from a TV studio?

What if a large number of eyewitnesses described controlled demolitions and not just buildings falling apart?

Would you believe them or what was repeated by talking heads again and again?

Do you have a pre-disposition to your understanding the events of Sept. 11?

Could you let your pre-judgments go if you wanted, or do you need to believe what you were told?

You might tell I have a bit of a problem with what has been called the “official” version of 9-11; the only question I have left is why don’t you?