Ron Paul! but i dont comprimise when it comes to the issue of 9/11, especially since i feel Paul doesnt have much of a realistic chance(though i am surprised at just how good hes done online). Paul shouldnt get a pass on this issue just for the good of his campaign. it would be one thing if he was silent on 9/11 like everyone else but he claims blowback, thus validating the notion that 9/11 was an organic "al qaeda" plot and hes praised the 9/11 Commission Report numerous times. thats like praising The Warren Commission, obviously after so much time has passed theres a broad consensus that JFK was an inside job(or at least not Oswald) and the Warren Report was a farce. Paul is validating the Warren Report of our time. he doesnt have to call 9/11 an inside job but i expect better from a guy like Paul. he cant be that dense, he has to see how ridiculous the official story is with people like us supporting him(9/11 activists). saying it would sink his presidential hopes isnt good enough reason to contribute to the worst cover-up of our time in my opinion, even if i did think he had a realistic shot. its about principle and i cant imagine that Paul really believes the 9/11 Commission Report is anything but bad fiction, yet there he goes telling Rudy to read it and learn.

"The Central Intelligence Agency owns everyone of any significance in the major media." ~ William Colby, Former Director, CIA