Support 911Blogger


The Growing 9/11 Drone Army

Army Sees 11,000% Increase in US Army Drone Arsenal Over Last 10 Years Since: New Legislation Paves Way for 30,000 More Above the USA

Brian Romanoff      Nor Cal Truth     Feb 20, 2012

Never let it be said that the military industrial complex does not heavily rely on 9/11 to continue and thrive.

In October of 2001 the US Army had about 54 drones in its arsenal, however that would change soon after the attacks of 9/11. Some numbers are noted by the Scientific American:

The U.S. Army's drone armada alone has expanded from 54 drones in October 2001, when U.S. combat operations began in Afghanistan, to more than 4,000 drones performing surveillance, reconnaissance and attack missions in Afghanistan, Iraq and Pakistan (pdf).

There are more than 6,000 of them throughout the U.S. military as a whole, and continued developments promise to make these controversial aircraft—blamed for the deaths of militants as well as citizens—far more intelligent and nimble.

From 54 drones in 2001 to the current 6,000 in-stock, within 10 years of 9/11 the US Army saw a net increase of their drone arsenal by 11,000%.

That was then. This is now:

A new law signed by Obama last week, HR 658, is set to increase the amount of drones in the skies over the USA. The Washington Times has this:

The legislation would order the FAA, before the end of the year, to expedite the process through which it authorizes the use of drones by federal, state and local police and other agencies.

Section 332 of the new FAA legislation also orders the agency to develop a system for licensing commercial drone flights as part of the nation’s air traffic control system by 2015.

The provision in the legislation is the fruit of “a huge push by lawmakers and the defense sector to expand the use of drones” in American airspace, she added.

The agency projects that 30,000 drones could be in the nation’s skies by 2020.

Business Insider points out important facts to remember:

This new bill follows up the Army's January directive to use drone fleets in the U.S. for training missions and "domestic operations."

And both of these initiatives are mandated in the NDAA (section 1097) that calls for six drone test ranges to be operational within six months of that bills signing December 31.

The commercial drone market would be worth hundreds of millions more if the bill passes.

Northrop Grumman, Raytheon, Lockheed Martin and many other 'Corporate Partners' are poised to profit heavily from the legislation. They are the Association for Unmanned Vehicle Systems International or AUVSI, a conglomerate of 'defense' companies that essentially lobbied for and drafted HR 658.

Republic Report highlights the fact that AUVSI doubled its lobbying expenses last year:

In addition, major manufacturers like Northrup Grumman spent tens of millions lobbying last year.

These lobbying expenditures covered the FAA drone expansion law, but also encompassed other military related legislative items, making a more comprehensive look at drone lobby spending more difficult to pin down.

In a separate article, Republic Report reports that AUVSI also bragged in a power-point presentation that:

– Page 6: “the only changes made to the UAS section of the House FAA bill were made at the request of AUVSI. Our suggestions were often taken word-for-word.”

What will the drones be doing in the US? Afterall, 30,000 drones in US airspace is still many thousands more drones than is currently employed to fight wars throughout the World.

In late 2011 MSNBC reported that since 9/11, 30,000,000 cameras have been installed throughout the streets of the US.

Rasmussen Reports released stats that show the approval rating for Congress has slipped to a historic low of 5%.

Obama recently signed the NDAA which allows for the detention of US citizens, without due-process.

Could it be that concerns beyond privacy are reasonable?

 

$$$

Top recipients for ALL supporting interest groups

Name Amount Received Vote On Passage

Rep. John Mica [R, FL-7] $133,163 Aye
Rep. Jerry Costello [D, IL-12] $101,850 Nay
Rep. Charles Dent [R, PA-15] $89,400 Aye
Rep. Thomas Petri [R, WI-6] $89,300 Aye
Rep. Daniel Lipinski [D, IL-3] $86,650 Nay
Rep. Earl Blumenauer [D, OR-3] $85,300 Nay
Rep. James Clyburn [D, SC-6] $82,650 Nay
Rep. Timothy Bishop [D, NY-1] $81,850 Nay
Rep. Shelley Berkley [D, NV-1] $79,240 Nay
Rep. Steny Hoyer [D, MD-5] $79,000 Nay

Sen. Harry Reid [D, NV] $216,950
Sen. Roy Blunt [R, MO] $166,950
Sen. Barbara Boxer [D, CA] $141,190
Sen. Patty Murray [D, WA] $139,800
Sen. Robert Portman [R, OH] $135,950
Sen. Charles Schumer [D, NY] $117,050
Sen. John Isakson [R, GA] $111,750
Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand [D, NY] $95,541
Sen. David Vitter [R, LA] $86,650
Sen. Mark Kirk [R, IL] $76,699

http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-h658/money