Video: David Lynch on Loose Change
Reprehensor Wed, 12/06/2006 - 6:52am
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8175484657963455824
"...you don't have to believe everything in the documentary to still have questions come up... and you look back and you remember what you saw, and what you were told, and now, you have questions."
Clip from VPRO's Wereldgasten, december 3rd 2006. David Lynch discusses Loose Change.
Thanks "nouse".
- Login to post comments
i always liked david lynch as a film maker
its great to see he is an honest man
'its too big to think about' is a good summary of our largest obstical
The Big Lie
That's just the way it was meant to be: The Big Lie
from Wikipedia:
The phrase Big Lie refers to a propaganda technique which entered mass consciousness with Adolf Hitler's 1925 autobiography Mein Kampf. In that book Hitler wrote that people came to believe that Germany lost World War I in the field due to a propaganda technique used by Jews who were influential in the German press. This technique, he believed, consisted of telling a lie so "colossal" that no one would believe anyone "could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously". The first documented use of the phrase "big lie" is in the corresponding passage: "in the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility".
All the more difficult to
All the more difficult to live in the truth.
you can say that again
nothing easy about freedom
"The truth shall make you free." Why not make the truth free? We live on a priceless blue pearl, awash in a universe of fire and ice. Cut the crap.
David Lynch Questions Official 9/11 Conspiracy Theory
Digg it:
http://digg.com/political_opinion/David_Lynch_Questions_Official_9_11_Co...
Stallion dude, just to let
Stallion dude, just to let you know I had to take down the Craig Bartmer interview from google, he said he was getting harassed or some shit by assholes that he used to work with because of it. I didn’t want to do it on one level but he seemed kind of stressed by it being up there, so I thought it was the right thing to do, sorry about that man!
Really?
Wow that's too bad. I was wondering what happened to it.
I transcribed some of his interview if anyone wants it:
http://www.911blogger.com/node/4095#comment-84582
Digg this one too
http://www.digg.com/political_opinion/Ten_Reasons_To_Impeach_The_President
To explain, VPRO
To explain, VPRO Wereldgasten is a television program in The Netherlands.
It's too big
Yes. That's it exactly. The biggest obstacle I face is the reaction every truth virgin has. "No way." "You're crazy." And most recently..."You mean to tell me you don't think 19 Arabs brought down those buildings?" This from a highly respected doctor specializing in reproduction. One who thinks of himself as an independent, reads the NY Times, watches CNN, speaks negatively about FOX.
Then it got worse. "Why isn't the press covering it?" I tried to explain the the MSM was no longer independent.
Now he looked at me like I was a complete nut. First I say 9/11 is an inside job and now I say that the MSM is also corrupt.
It's just too big for people to comprehend.
My question is, how do you convince someone in 30 seconds or less that at the very least, they should be considering what we really do know and not what the governement has fed us since 9/11?
How do you explain to someone that everything they believe is true isn't?
We are indeed asking people to take a huge leap of faith.
How best to do it?
In thirty seconds or less.
You don't get a second chance to make a first impression.
30 seconds or less.
Any ideas/suggestions?
Peak Oil
Don't forget to mention that fears of Peak Oil reality may be THE issue that ties and spins all of these lies. IMO, it's all about energy security.
show them a clip of WTC7
show them a clip of WTC7 collapsing.
As about 90% of the population does not know that a THIRD skyscraper collapsed that day, this will usually wake them up and show how the MSM has been quiet about this...
"In times of universal deceit, telling the truth will be a revolutionary act." - George Orwell
Yup!
That's what did it for me -- I must have had subliminal doubts all along, but once I saw the WTC7 clip I flipped to the bright side in seconds.
It accomplishes three things immediately: makes one realize that the press has blacked out information, demonstrates a gaping hole in the official story, and produces a desire to look further into it.
Almost makes me want to purchase a mini video device and carry it with me everywhere I go.
Yeah, show them 7.....
....and then, as a friend of mine so perfectly put it, "watch their face melt"....
Works every time.
Also, if you can then give them the "11 Remarkable Facts about 9/11" card by the estimable Ken Jenkins, as a follow-up, it's even better....
To obtain those cards go to:
www.911sharethetruth.com
get an iPod...
get an iPod...
agreed that building 7 is the silver bullet
I had my doubts after looking at Hunt the Boeing but once I watched building 7 on In Plane Site that was it. Flawed as it was with the pod theory and what not, it included building 7.
That's why I've always found it suspicious when people say ignore the Pentagon and ignore the demolitions. Puh-leeze. Hundreds of hours of public truthing confirms my position--when people have to resort to "the plane vaporized" and "the building fell because of fire and debris" they begin to look and sound like the moonbats they accuse us of being.
Turn it right around on them. Ask them if they really believe that 7 just... fell. And then offer to sell them beachfront property in Kansas.
____
Real Truther a.k.a. Verdadero Verdadero
WTCdemolition.com - Harvard Task Force
1-minute informational on WTC 7
A 1-minute informational on just WTC 7, aired prime time, could do wonders. It should show 3 different videos of its collapse, followed by the relevant facts in a nutshell -- including the fact that the fall accelerated at the rate of free fall.
It should NOT contain the "Pull it" statement, as that would allow the shills to concentrate on debunking it.
It is building 7...
My own kids tried to convince me this was an inside job and for weeks I told them they were crazy...our government wouldn't do this to its own people. I agreed to sit down to a video clip of building 7 and my life hasn't been the same ever since. It is the true smoking gun. Obvious controlled demolition to anyone that takes the time to look. It's just a matter of connecting the dots from that point forward.
Amazing to see such a well orchestrated plan of attack...and then this faux pax. What were they thinking? No one is gonna see this 47 story mammoth building disappear in 6 seconds?
Osama Bin Laden not wanted
Osama Bin Laden not wanted in connection to 9-11 attacks. He isn't wanted for 9-11! On the FBI's MOST WANTED LIST. The FBI could not find hard evidence linking him to 9-11. "Oh yeah, then is that why he isn't wanted in connection to 9-11 on the FBI's MOST WANTED LIST. C'mon," When people feel that they have been outsmarted in a conversation, they will race to find out your information is wrong, but when they find out the truth, they will take note. And then they will face to feel the exhilaration of knowing more than someone else, and curiosity will kill the cat, but satisfaction will bring it back.
Portable DVD player
I just bought a portable 7 in widescreen Philips DVD player from AMAZON for $125 so that I can show Bldg 7 as I give away DVDs. I have made more than 2,100 copies of various films.
Most recently it is a Terrorstorm/911 Mysteries on a single disc.
I think that showing a clip will greatly increase the chances of someone actually watching the film (which is about all that it takes).
I have not yet gone out to test the approach. Will soon and will report back.
We must be the change we wish to see in the world. M Gandhi
In 30 secoonds...
Convince them to watch Loose Change in its entirety.
Waiting for the final cut of
Waiting for the final cut of Loose Change to unleash my onslaught of information.... hoping it's coming soon..... I have a theater lined up for showing
going to show Loose Change every Friday for 4 weeks followed by different film every week.... Beyond Treason.... 9/11 Mysteries..... Who Killed John ONeil.... Press for Truth
DNA
How do we know the identities of the hijackers? According to Popular Mechanics, the FBI claims to have DNA evidence. Where did they get orignial samples for matching? And how how did they know the names so soon? This is impossible. Even the FBI Director has admitted the hijackers are still a mystery.
Also, the flight into the Pentagon, according to the NTSB was a corkscrew dive that would have created a force of 7 G's, meaning a 150 pound pilot would suddenly weigh more than 1,000 pounds and be rendered unable to hold the controls. Again, impossible.
You don't need to convict anyone, nor do you have to say it is an inside job. People will conclude that for themselves. All you have to do is show the official story to be impossible, and say we need an open investigation until the crime is solved. Do not try to fully explain anything you cannot. Do not engage in speculation.
Needing some emphasize...
All you have to do is show the official story to be impossible, and say we need an open investigation until the crime is solved.
Do not try to fully explain anything you cannot.
Do not engage in speculation.
re: According to Popular Mechanics...lol
AND some of them are STILL ALIVE !!
Telegraph.co.uk
By David Harrison
(Filed: 23/09/2001)
Revealed: the men with stolen identities
excerpt:
"Saudi Airlines said it was considering legal action against the FBI for seriously damaging its reputation and that of its pilots. The FBI released the list of 19 suicide terrorists three days after the attacks.
The statement said that the 19 "have been identified as hijackers aboard the four airliners". Photographs and personal details were published around the world with an appeal for "information about these individuals, even though they are presumed dead".
The Saudi Airlines pilot, Saeed Al-Ghamdi, 25, and Abdulaziz Al-Omari, an engineer from Riyadh, are furious that the hijackers' "personal details" - including name, place, date of birth and occupation - matched their own.
Mr Al-Ghamdi was named as a terrorist on the United Airlines flight that crashed in Pennsylvania - a plane said by some experts to have been heading for the White House.
He first knew that he was on the FBI's list when he was told by a colleague. Speaking from Tunisia, he said: "I was completely shocked. For the past 10 months I have been based in Tunis with 22 other pilots learning to fly an Airbus 320. The FBI provided no evidence of my presumed involvement in the attacks.
"You cannot imagine what it is like to be described as a terrorist - and a dead man - when you are innocent and alive." The airline was angry too. Officials brought Mr Al-Ghamdi back to Saudi Arabia last week for a 10-day holiday to avoid arrest or interrogation.
An official said: "We are consulting lawyers about what action to take to protect the reputation of our pilots." Mr Al-Ghamdi faced further embarrassment when CNN, the American television network, flashed a photograph of him around the world, naming him as a hijack suspect."
somebody should try to
somebody should try to interview those guys, on video at best,but maybe they aren't interested,but one would think they would like to be cleared.Their faces are shown repeatedly over again and again on tv.
Remember what Peter Dale Scott said
The so-called "debunkers" usually respond to the claim that "the hijackers are still alive" with one of two retorts: (1) the real hijackers were using stolen identities, or (2) the BBC has since corrected its original report and now does not claim to have located the actual hijackers (the BBC did, in fact, change its online story, thereby rewriting history).
I would focus instead on what Peter Dale Scott said the other week: according to the FBI, it identified 18 of 19 hijackers by 9:59am on 9/11. According to the NORAD tapes, the military didn't even know Flight 93 was hijacked until 10:07, after it had crashed (this is how the military explains why it did not intercept 93; it is also a lie).
So, taking the government at its own words, we are to believe that 3 of 4 hijackers on UA93 were identified by the FBI before the military even knew the plane was hijacked. This is impossible, and there is no rebuttal involving BBC's journalistic practices.
That is a great point
Thanks for highlighting yet another inconsistency in the official version.
Cheers,
B
Where does the FBI say it
Where does the FBI say it identified 18 of 19 hijackers by 9:59. This is the second time Ive heard this and wasnt aware of it...any link?
Thanks
It's taken from "Against all Enemies"
by Richard Clarke
"Richard Clarke heard that the FBI had the names at 9:59 AM, the time of the collapse of WTC Tower 2. See Richard A. Clarke, Against All Enemies: Inside America’s War on Terrorism (New York: Simon & Schuster, 2004), 13-14; Thompson, The Terror Timeline, 441. This investigative tour de force is even more amazing when we consider that in the FBI, according to the 9/11 Report (77), 'prior to 9/11 relatively few strategic analytic reports about counterterrorism had been completed. Indeed, the FBI had never completed an assessment of the overall terrorist threat to the U.S. homeland.'"
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=SCO20061...
It is noteworthy that they probably got these names from a document found in Atta's car, if I remember correctly.
However, I believe that the list of names discovered was planted, since some of the "hijackers" are still alive.
Why only 18 out of 19? Maybe they decided to write another name on that piece of paper later. We know that they changed who flew on which plane! Flight 77 for example.
None of the hijackers show up on any flight manifests, or any security videos. They released videos with the hijackers from different airports on different dates (or blocked out the date). They were poor pilots. They never flew the jets used on 9/11. Several couldn't even get drivers licenses. A flight instructor described a few of them as "dumb and dumber". No Arabic names on the autopsy list for flight 77. And so on.
The FBI has almost no evidence--they couldn't prove anything in court. They admit that:
"[The hijackers] left no paper trail … In our investigation, we have not uncovered a single piece of paper — either here in the United States or in the treasure trove of information that has turned up in Afghanistan and elsewhere — that mentioned any aspect of the Sept. 11 plot."
The evidence is so ridiculous that it starts sounding like an outrageous conspiracy theory.
“We're an empire now, and when we act we create our own reality."
3 questions... #1 how did
3 questions...
#1 how did they manage to get by over 20 differant intelligence agencyies with a 40 billion dollar budget.
#2 why werent the planes intercepted? Thousands of training hours, hundreds of simulations, yet they are in complete paralysis the day they all could have been national heroes.
#3 Can Osama really manage to defeat Norad from a cave in Afghanistan?
I was showed a picture of the Pentagon and asked to show where the wreckage was...that was all it took to open my eyes to this whole can of worms. Once I found the wreckage was inconsistant with the story,
I did further research. Of coarse it is now generally felt that what hit the pentagon is a "Taboo subject".
But it is what got me here personally...1 simple picture.
downloaded WTC video to my Q
All this time I have had the Motorolla Q. To think I could have been using it to show people videos of WTC7 collapsing and I never thought of it before.
Thank you all for your 30 second recommendations.
And remember, you don't get a second chance to make a first impression.
Portable video is a great idea.
In its absence, if you only have 30 seconds and you're talking to a complete Truth virgin, I would give this a spin: "Do you realize that the family members of the victims have called for a new investigation because they feel that the first one was so flawed and inadequate?"
Fantastic idea!
I have had a friend read my WTC 7 page on my Nokia, but showing a video hasn't occurred to me.
Every truther with a multimedia-capable cell phone could have a few videos of WTC 7 on it.
That is definitely an idea worth promoting.
free fall speed
According to the laws of physics, (“conservation of momentum”) building collapse at free fall is impossible unless done with controlled demolition. This is the most devastating evidence. NIST admits free fall speed. No more proof is needed to prove that 9/11 was an inside job.
Anyone with common sense can understand that if an object hits another object it must slow down. This didn't happen on 9/11 when the towers "collapsed".
“We're an empire now, and when we act we create our own reality."
THANK YOU!!!!! Ive been
THANK YOU!!!!! Ive been saying this forever....
You can break alot of laws and get away with it...not the law of physics though.
IT'S TOO BIG, says it all!
I have to comment on some things and this TOO BIG thing inspires me to do so.
David Lynch is a master and you can see CLEARLY he knows the whole thing, even the parts that are way down the rabbitt hole. The evidence is right there, from many different sources, if only you will look at it, but who wants to do that? who wants to eat from that can of worms? only those who find THE TRUTH, irresistable.
This only shows the ruthless brilliance the perpetrators have. They are saying "we will go all the way", we will put any pile of turds in your face if you don't follow the party line. I think 911 happened because we weren't vigilant enough on this like OK city Iran Contra ect.
I have to say that the 911 truth movement has taken a BIG TIME, WRONG TURN, with the recent rantings and ravings about the Morgan Reynolds, Judy Wood, triangle debacle, which I hope will be straightned out by Fetzer, but it doesn't look like it. We all know about these rabbitt holes, this one is particularly distracting. The whole focus of the movement should be too keep putting that turd right back in their face, the scientific evidence! Trouble is people will not smell the coffee(or whatever) until they know that it effects them BIG TIME.
i WOULD LIKE SOME FEEDBACK PLEASE! especially after todays Fetzers pay for the archives GCN radio show. Also I wonder if that GCN radio show can be played from this website? I guess I'm probaglby wasting my time posting here....
Not keen on your metaphor, but
this
"I think 911 happened because we weren't vigilant enough on this like OK city Iran Contra ect."
is a good insight.
BTW, Fetzer is not going to fix things. He has set up house on the Dark Side, and I don't think he's coming back.
Lynch's comment at the end
Lynch's comment at the end speaks volumes and im guessing there are millions out there like him. thats why we are here. to show them its too big to ignore.
David Lynch is the man.
David Lynch is the man. Pure and simple.
"True enlightenment is attained when one can, at will, see through the illusion of reality." - Me, intoxicated
David Lynch Goes Public With
David Lynch Goes Public With 9/11 Questions
Film director is disturbed by unanswered questions
Steve Watson
Infowars.net
Wednesday, December 6, 2006
Film Director and cult icon David Lynch has gone public with concerns he has over the official government story of the September 11 2001 terror attacks. Lynch has stated that he is disturbed by unanswered questions concerning the Pentagon attack, the collapse of the buildings in New York and the strange ending of flight 93 in Pennsylvania.
http://www.infowars.net/articles/december2006/061206Lynch.htm
One of my favorite directors
I posted on here and elsewhere a long time ago David Lynch was questioning 9/11 on his blog and daily weather briefing, good to see he still is.
Since the mid 90's, David Lynch quickly became my favroite director, and his new visionary masterpiece "Inland Empire" comes out in a couple weeks.
Oh and the Dutch engineer? Guess who harassed him? The "debunkers". I saw on JREF type sites idiots bragging how they were going to call the poor man and harass them.
Seriously, we all bag on the no plane/space beam/mini nuke cream people...
but is there ANYONE more rude, blind sighted, vengeful and hateful than the self proclaimed "debunkers".
For people who deny being pro war/pro Bush people, yet calling us "deniers" and "Twoofers", they sure seem to have nothing but hatred and spite in their hearts.
They dont even believe the air quality coverup! Whose the deniers? F all those f'ers.
An exchange from "Lost Highway" I enjoy
AL (to Renee)
Do you own a video camera?
RENEE
No. Fred hates them.
FRED
I like to remember things my own way.
AL
What do you mean by that?
FRED
How I remember them. Not necessarily the way they happened.
------------------------------
I'm sure in Lynch's world view, 9/11 is irretrievable because so many people simply remember it how they remember it, not the way it happened.
See also
See also http://www.vpro.nl/programma/wereldgasten/afleveringen/30576250/
The full broadcast in streaming video can be seen or downloaded via http://cgi.omroep.nl/cgi-bin/streams?/tv/vpro/wereldgasten/bb.20061203.asf
The interview with David
The interview with David Lynch was broadcast on Holland's third public tv channel "Nederland 3" from 8.20-10pm, last Sunday evening. It had around 200.000 viewers. A good start, now that this interview will "go global".
For a slightly longer
For a slightly longer version of the interview with David Lynch, see http://video.google.nl/videoplay?docid=-3278373770361450669 .
does the democrats have a need to cover up?
hi,
I hope you would visit this:
http://piletech.blogspot.com/