Problematic Visual Flight Conditions Only Hours Before 9/11 Attacks
After reportedly purchasing their flight’s tickets weeks earlier in August of 2001 and while possibly relying on limited radio frequency navigation aids, the accused 9/11 hijackers allegedly guided American Airlines Flight 11 and United Airlines Flight 175 visually into the WTC after descending into New York City airspace from 20,000 - 30,000 foot altitudes, a task made more difficult if not unlikely, had this been attempted through the dense cloud cover that largely hid the WTC just hours earlier on September 10, 2001.
- Aidan Monaghan's blog
- Login to post comments
The System Was Blinking Red: The Intelligence Communities Response To The 9/11 Attacks
“We are going to be struck soon. Many Americans are going to die and it could be in the United States.” — Cofer Black speech at Department of Defense coronation on counter-terrorism (8–15–2001)
There was an aura of heightened tension that encompassed every intelligence facility in the United States, even around the globe in the summer of 2001. The warning cables of an imminent attack upon the United States came from every corner of the earth. Italy, Spain, Lebanon, Germany, Israel, France, Canada, Egypt. The information, vague, Al Qaeda led by it’s emir, Osama Bin Laden, had a plot to conduct a massive domestic attack. But how, when?
New Critique of the CIT Interview of Sgt William Lagasse
Previously on my website (https://911speakout.org) I posted an analysis of Craig Ranke's interview of Albert Hemphill that displays the deceptive interview techniques used to slant the interview toward a predetermined outcome of supposedly supporting the CIT North of CITGO hypothesis.
I have now added a second ananysis: the interview of Sgt. William Lagasse. Lagasse is CIT's star witness. It seems that email correspondence between Lagasse and Dick Eastman prior to CIT's interview may have been the origin of the North of CITGO hypothesis. In that email correspondence Lagasse makes the erroneous statement that he was standing on the "Starboard side of the aircraft." I say erroneous because the word "starboard" is used three times in that correspondence. It is first introduced by Eastman. Lagasse, who exhibits a fondness for using jargon, then uses the word, but the context shows he has port and starboard reversed in his mind. Therefore he is really saying he was on the left side of the plane, which is consistent with a South of CITGO flight path, which is consistent with the trail of physical evidence.
- davidschandler's blog
- Read more
- Login to post comments
9/11 Cover Up Director (Philip Zelikow) Appointed to Chair COVID Cover Up Group 26 min
9/11 Cover Up Director (Philip Zelikow) Appointed to Chair COVID Cover Up Group 26 min
https://www.bitchute.com/video/iew3DIBAOLM/
Corbett Report Extras
corbettreport
New 9/11 Timeline Entries: Richard Myers's Actions During the Attacks, Pre-9/11 Warnings About Al-Qaeda, and More
From the History Commons Groups blog:
A large number of entries have been added to the Complete 9/11 Timeline at History Commons. The majority of these deal with events that took place on September 11, 2001, with a particular focus on the actions of General Richard B. Myers, the highest-ranking military officer in the United States when the terrorist attacks occurred; others describe notable incidents that occurred before 9/11, such as warnings issued by key individuals about the threat posed by al-Qaeda and discussions within government agencies about killing Osama bin Laden.
Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Myers Learned of the Attacks on the World Trade Center
Many new timeline entries provide details of the response of Myers to the 9/11 attacks. Myers was at the time vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. However, General Henry Shelton, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, was out of the country for most of the day of September 11 and so Myers stood in for him as acting chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
- Shoestring's blog
- Read more
- Login to post comments
Time-Waster in Chief: General Richard Myers, the Highest-Ranking Military Officer in the U.S. During the 9/11 Attacks
General Richard Myers was the highest-ranking military officer in the country when America came under terrorist attack on September 11, 2001, and yet he appears to have done nothing that would have helped protect the nation while the attacks took place.
Myers was, in September 2001, vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff--the second-highest-ranking officer in the U.S. military. However, when the 9/11 attacks occurred, General Henry Shelton, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, was out of the country and so Myers was the acting chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and took on the chairman's responsibilities until Shelton returned to the United States late in the afternoon of September 11.
“COVID-911: From Homeland Security to Biosecurity” by The Corbett Report 9/11/2020
“COVID-911: From Homeland Security to Biosecurity” , a 34 minute video was published by The Corbett Report on 9/11/2020. Transcripts, alternative video media platforms and sources: https://www.corbettreport.com/covid911/
YOUTUBE - https://youtu.be/opAyJt94Kmo
DESCRIPTION
9/11, as we were told repeatedly in the days, weeks, and months after the attack, was the day that changed everything. And now a new event has come along to once again throw the world into chaos. But whereas the post-9/11 era introduced America to the concept of homeland security, the COVID-19 era is introducing the world to an altogether more abstract concept: biosecurity. This is the story of the COVID-911 security state.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
COVID-911 eludes to “The Great Reset”.
October 7, 2020 James Corbett Breaks Down the Great Reset with Pete Quinones
https://www.corbettreport.com/interview-1581-james-corbett-breaks-down-the-great-reset/
AA Flight 77 at the Pentagon
New video by David Chandler.
https://lbry.tv/@911SpeakOut:8/Pentagon-FDR-Correlation:d
https://www.bitchute.com/video/wbS8gD092j4m/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lGb2D-FZWk0
Until now I, and a number of others in Scientists for 9/11 Truth, have maintained, that the evidence supports the theory that the Pentagon was hit by a large plane, consistent with a Boeing 757. New evidence that emerged in connection with the Denver conference on the Pentagon Evidence adds significant support to the theory that the impacting plane was actually AA Flight 77.
The logic of making this specific identification is:
The data from the flight data recorder (FDR) recovered in the Pentagon shows a remarkable correspondence with actual “facts on the ground,” leading us to conclude this is an authentic record of the plane that entered the Pentagon.