Massive Grab Bag of the Week

It is so amazing how much is being said lately about 9/11 each and every week. What is even more amazing is how the mainstream media continues to ignore the 9/11 elephant in the room. When I first started this blog I was worried that covering only new 9/11 related news would be to narrow a scope to be consistent, guess I was wrong.

So, kick back, relax, and catch up on a ton of 9/11 related stuff from this week.

Tucker Carlson, PNAC & 9/11 - Another PNAC 9/11 Connection

Here is a bit more about Tucker Carlson's interview with the physics professor who put forth a paper claiming explosives were used to destroy the WTC on 9/11... just prior to the professor's appearance on Carlson's program, Tucker's guest was someone from the Weekly Standard (this guy was a regular guest).

The Weekly Standard's chief editor is William Kristol, who also happens to be the chairman of the Project for a New American Century, PNAC! This is the quaint little organization that produced people like Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Pearl & at least six other people who were members of the Bush administration on the morning of 9/11. They are also the organization that wrote about the how America having a "new Pearl Harbor" would help them achieve their goal.

Tucker finds nothing disturbing or newsworthy about the PNAC connection to 9/11. As a matter of fact by virtue of the company he keeps, he supports PNAC. Tucker tells anyone who thinks that people within our government would be involved in something like 9/11 that they should leave the country but he cozies up to people who thought a new Pearl Harbor would be a good idea! So this is a little more PNAC related 9/11 news for your records.

The Weekly Standard Attacks 9/11 Truth
Compare this to the article right above this. Kinda funny how The Weekly Standard comes out on the offensive against 9/11 skeptics the same week as Tucker isn't it? After all, the head editor of The Weekly Standard is Bill Kristol, current Chairman and founder of the PNAC.

There is, though, a need to remember what transpired before the war - in fact, soon after the towers fell. And what happened was this declaration, from the mouth of Rep. Cynthia McKinney while the ashes were still smoldering: "We know there were numerous warnings of the events to come on September 11. What did this administration know and when did it know it, about the events of September 11?"

Farfetched as the claim may have seemed - the utterance of a leftist conspiracy wacko - the Georgia congresswoman was the first but would not be the last to accuse President Bush of having purposefully ignored intelligence that predicted the imminent use of hijacked planes as missiles.
Echoed Senator Hillary Clinton soon thereafter - from the Senate floor, no less: "What did Bush know and when did he know it."
What you may not remember was that the source of all this hysteria was a single Presidential Daily Briefing, given to the president on August 6, 2001. The report said nothing about hijacked planes being flown into buildings and indeed admitted that "some of the more sensational threat reporting" could not be corroborated. It did, however, refer to bin Laden's stated goals of bringing the fighting to America - claims made by bin Laden himself on national television three years before - as well as the luckily foiled millennium bomber of 1999 and the African embassy bombings a year earlier.

An Incomplete Investigation -

It was interesting to hear from the 9/11 Commission again on Tuesday. This self-perpetuating and privately funded group of lobbyists and lawyers has recently opined on hurricanes, nuclear weapons, the Baltimore Harbor Tunnel and even the New York subway system. Now it offers yet another "report card" on the progress of the FBI and CIA in the war against terrorism, along with its "back-seat" take and some further unsolicited narrative about how things ought to be on the "front lines."

Yet this is also a good time for the country to make some assessments of the 9/11 Commission itself. Recent revelations from the military intelligence operation code-named "Able Danger" have cast light on a missed opportunity that could have potentially prevented 9/11. Specifically, Able Danger concluded in February 2000 that military experts had identified Mohamed Atta by name (and maybe photograph) as an al Qaeda agent operating in the U.S. Subsequently, military officers assigned to Able Danger were prevented from sharing this critical information with FBI agents, even though appointments had been made to do so. Why?

There are other questions that need answers. Was Able Danger intelligence provided to the 9/11 Commission prior to the finalization of its report, and, if so, why was it not explored? In sum, what did the 9/11 commissioners and their staff know about Able Danger and when did they know it?

Believe 9-11 Was an Inside Job? Leave the Country! - Another Day in the Empire

Swanson frozen food heir, Tucker Carlson, host of MSNBC's The Situation with Tucker Carlson, believes you should get out of America if you believe nine eleven was an inside job.
Of course, the government or factions therein did not kill 3,000 Americans (and foreigners) "for no reason," as Carlson ignorantly claims - it killed them for very specific reasons, namely as collateral damage in the first battle of World War Four, the Clash of Civilizations (call it the "new Pearl Harbor"). Indeed, it is "evil" and all Americans are "complicit in it" as citizens and taxpayers. If Carlson sincerely believes his government wouldn't do such a thing, he should read up on Operation Northwoods, subtitled "Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff, Justification for US Military Intervention in Cuba, March 13, 1962," currently archived at the National Security Archive. "Written in response to a request from the Chief of the Cuba Project, Col. Edward Lansdale, the Top Secret memorandum describes U.S. plans to covertly engineer various pretexts [terrorist attacks] that would justify a U.S. invasion of Cuba," the NSA summarizes. & Working Together
Best wishes Jesse! has entered into a cooperative agreement with - will assist in their efforts to bring the vital questions surrounding the events of 9/11 into the public discourse. Where possible we will lend our advice and assistance as tries to step in to the roll that the journalists of our nation have vacated. We will assist in any way we can.

What is the Commission's mandate?

The Commission's mandate is to provide a "full and complete accounting" of the attacks of September 11, 2001 and recommendations as to how to prevent such attacks in the future.
So... if the 9/11 Commission's mandate was to get a "full and complete accounting" of the attacks of September 11th, 2001, then why were certain things omitted? If certain things were omitted, does that not make the 9/11 Commission's findings null and void?

Here is an excerpt from a show called the "Washington Journal". On this particular show, Lee Hamilton, the co-chair for the 9/11 Commission was on the program discussing the "9/11 Public Discourse Project". This is a supposed "watchdog" group that makes sure the Government is doing everything they can to prevent the next terrorist attack, and to make sure the recommendations put forth by the Commission are implemented.

As you can see, when Mr. Hamilton was confronted about Building 7, he stated that, "some things were left out of the report."

By his own admission, the 9/11 Commission did not give a "full and complete accounting" of the attacks on September 11th, 2001.

Therefore, the findings of the 9/11 Commission are NULL & VOID.

Madonna Can't Prove Government Was in on 9/11 'Deal'

"9/11 was too ambiguous," she tells the magazine.

"You couldn't prove how the government was somehow in on the deal. There were too many arguments against it. You could say, 'Oh, that's just Michael Moore,' 'Oh, that's just hearsay.'

So - is Madonna saying that the government was in on 9/11 and if someone with more credibility than Michael Moore tackled the issue, we'd all now see how the US government was in on 'the deal?'

Is this a serious statement? Somehow out of context?

Crooked Cops and 9-11

Well, a passport from one of the alleged hijackers was "found" a couple of blocks from the Twin Towers. And yet the government claims that the areas inside the Twin Towers where planes crashed were infernos so hot that they caused the collapse of the massive steel cores in the center of the towers. Indeed, the passport-owner's hijacked plane was allegedly almost completely lodged in the building's core. How could the passport have survived and ended up a couple of blocks away?

It is thus clear that evidence was planted to frame the hijackers on 9/11. Even a simple tv detective would ask who had the opportunity and motive to frame these patsies. He would also ask whether the persons who planted the evidence were the real culprits.

Thermite and the WTC Collapses

"The temperature at the core of "the pile," is near 2000 degrees Fahrenheit, according to fire officials, who add that the fires are too deep for firefighters to get to. " [ABC News, 9/18/01]
In perfect conditions the maximum temperature that can be reached by hydrocarbons such as jet fuel burning in air is 1520° F (825° C). When the WTC buildings collapsed the deeply buried fires would have been deprived of oxygen and their temperatures would have significantly decreased.
Why was the temperature at the core of "the pile" nearly 500° F hotter than the maximum burning temperature of jet fuel a full five days after the collapses? There were no infernos in either of the twin towers before they collapsed, so what caused their hot spots?

What caused the steel to melt? How did it stay molten for weeks after the collapses? How did fires in the WTC wreckage manage to burn for more than 3 months?

Thermite provides a plausible answer.

Steven Jones on the investigative journal on Mon., November 14, 2005 - Streaming MP3

Mike Malloy of Air America mentions
We must support those in the alternative media that support us. Thanks Mike.

Comments sent in via Email:

I believe there should at least be some mention in the main stream media that there are valid questions about the Tower collapses being raised by many people. What Tucker Carlson did was to totally disrespect anyone who does not blindly follow the same government which led us into Iraq with false information. Sounds like an old Iraq government trait to me. I have emailed MSNBC to express my outrage at Tucker's conduct and comments and I ask everyone who agrees with me to do the same. Emailing Carlson himself is like asking Dick Cheney for an honest answer about anything, a waste of time!! If MSNBC gets enough comments, they may at least rein this idiot in a bit.

Dear Mr. Tucker:

I believe that those buildings were collapsed with explosives. I further believe that the United States government caused those explosives to be detonated. I am a U.S. citizen, now living happily in Canada, and I do not want to return to the United States of Vicious, Murdering America.

I did "leave the country."

I just wanted to let you know that your page is most certainly followed overseas as well. Personally, I wouldn´t dream of 'logging on' without checking what´s new on the "911blog".

So: Thank You! And keep up the good work!!

do you guys know who

do you guys know who Immortal Technique is? hes a political rapper who calls out the ruling elite on a regular basis. i highly suggest you listen to the song"Cause Of Death" off of his album "Revolutionary Vol.2".in the song he talks about explosives in the towers,bin laden-bush ties, and much more.

we need to support this guy,

we need to support this guy, even if you dont like hip hop, you should really give the guy a listen.

Yeah... thanks for the hard

Yeah... thanks for the hard work.

We Need To Be More Visible

Believe 9-11 Was an Inside

Believe 9-11 Was an Inside Job? Leave the Country!

Kurt Nimmo | November 17 2005

Swanson frozen food heir, Tucker Carlson, host of MSNBC’s The Situation with Tucker Carlson, believes you should get out of America if you believe nine eleven was an inside job. Responding to a caller after Brigham Young University physics professor Steven E. Jones—who believes there were “pre-positioned explosives” in all three buildings at ground zero—appeared on his show, Carlson declared:

Â…if you really believe the U.S. government killed 3000 of its own citizens for no reason and lied about it and invaded Afghanistan as a result of something it did, you ought to leave the countryÂ… because thatÂ’s so terribleÂ… so evil, that your tax dollars go in to support it make you complicit in itÂ… if you really believe that, you ought to leaveÂ…

Of course, the government or factions therein did not kill 3,000 Americans (and foreigners) “for no reason,” as Carlson ignorantly claims—it killed them for very specific reasons, namely as collateral damage in the first battle of World War Four, the Clash of Civilizations (call it the “new Pearl Harbor”). Indeed, it is “evil” and all Americans are “complicit in it” as citizens and taxpayers. If Carlson sincerely believes his government wouldn’t do such a thing, he should read up on Operation Northwoods, subtitled “Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff, Justification for US Military Intervention in Cuba, March 13, 1962,” currently archived at the National Security Archive. “Written in response to a request from the Chief of the Cuba Project, Col. Edward Lansdale, the Top Secret memorandum describes U.S. plans to covertly engineer various pretexts [terrorist attacks] that would justify a U.S. invasion of Cuba,” the NSA summarizes.

Tucker Carlson claims to be a Libertarian—and yet he believes his government wouldn’t attack its own citizens and those who do should leave the country. In fact, Carlson is not a Libertarian—he is a statist working for the corporate media as a shill for Bushcon policies.

I called Tuckers voice mail

I called Tuckers voice mail line and played the videos of the firemen in the firehouse talking about detonations and the explosions. and told Carlson that like the video of WTC7 that he didn't show I expect him not to play this either. I called again later with another clip to provide the "open minded" Tucker with more evidence. This time I played the clip from news reports with a black male who had evacuated from the 23floor and mentioned the explosion that occured when they reached the 8th floor. I couldnt help but mention with obvious disqust and sarcasticly that yeah Tucker your SUCH THE PARTIOT love the show cant wait til its cancelled.

So, what is Tucker's excuse

So, what is Tucker's excuse for lying to the American people?
Does he think it's patriotic to lie to the American people?
Does he think it's patriotic to support those who threaten the very foundation of our country?
I call it treason.

As an American citizen, I've sworn to uphold the constitution of The United States, and to protect the United States against ALL enemies, foreign AND DOMESTIC. So, as a patriotic citizen of this country, I am obligated to demand an investigation into the very serious domestic threat to our nation that was revealed on 9-11-01.

Tucker Carlson Said that 9/11 Skeptics Should 'Leave the Country.'
Ironically, leaving this country unprotected when a serious threat arises would violate my oath of citizenship. I could even be charged with treason. This would be like everyone walking out of the bank, leaving everything unlocked, just when a bank robber has been sited entering the bank.

Again, what is Tucker's excuse for lying to the American People and supporting those who threaten this country? Perhaps he belongs in Gitmo. After all, he is protecting a suspected terrorist and/or terrorist network.

runnaround, Thanks for your


Thanks for your efforts.
I think Tucker made it pretty clear that he knows the buildings were blown up. Why else would he insist on NOT showing the evidence? Why did Tucker invite Professor Jones on the show,?

Professor Jones was very organized and well prepared, despite how the psyops team arranged it. He knew what to expect. Note, Jones couldn't see the video during the show, as he was in a different location. However, he suspected Tucker was being deceitful and was not showing the video, so Jones asked him DIRECTLY if he could show the video. Tucker was caught. If he said yes, the audience would catch him in a lie! So, Tucker was vague and said, "I don't know," like a little kid trying to duck responsibility. Then, Jones EXPLICITLY asked what was being shown. This cornered Tucker into admitting that he wasn't showing the video. Then, Jones SPECIFICALLY asked him to play the video he had sent to Tucker, letting the audience know what Tucker was up to.

Professor Jones' performance was quite impressive. Perhaps his years of seeing variations on "the dog ate my homework," prepared him well.

Although I was very disappointed to learn that Jones has chosen to withdraw from the media, I now understand. I can see many reasons for doing this, but the biggest reason is that it was a no-win situation. The only way to work around a political spinster is to become one... which contradicts the very message Jones was trying to present; truth.

This is a statement about the current condition of our "media," especially the Tucker Carlson show. Truth and honesty are not permitted. There is no real reporting; only story telling. Perhaps the Tucker show has been informative. We now know that truth is completely banned from that show. So, whatever episode they're playing at this "theater" in the future will indicate what scenarios can be eliminated as possible in the *real* story.

Janedoe, well said feeling

Janedoe, well said feeling your words there! Regardless with Tucker slightly stifling the interview, the audience that was exposed to the issue must have been in the millions, I don't know for sure though it would be cool if we could find out the ratings for the interview etc.

To All "Friendly" Media dz

To All "Friendly" Media

dz or sbg... please post this ASAP...


c, check out the 911 related


check out the 911 related music section on the left under media downloads.. we have a bunch of his tracks and others.. ill try to make it more prominent soon..

nice, thanks man.

nice, thanks man.

So sorry to read that

So sorry to read that tvnewslies has sold out any remaining integrity by joining with the likes of The Jimmy Walter Traveling Circus. Their line up of characters looks like a cast from Incredulity 101 (outside of Rodriguez, who has great integrity but is being misled).

Walters is a immoral nutcase and all the money in the world won't buy him an ounce of solid credibilty with the many researchers and activists who know the score.

Getchore free cd here!
it was just an ILLUSION!!
(sigh. what a bunch of gullible pansies.)

coyote, your more than


your more than welcome to your opinions, but no need to be hateful.. lord knows all the sites i have listed argue amongst themselves, but this site isnt about to get involved with that.

btw, jesse is a real guy, who was bustin his ass in NYC this 9/11, and if anything he will help, and definately not hurt it.

Hey everybody, I just

Hey everybody,
I just nominated Steve E Jones
"wings of justice" person of the week

at BuzzFlash

There was a typist mistake

There was a typist mistake in last sentence. It had meant to say "patsies", not pansies. Patsies is more appro. for Jimmy Walter's water carriers.

Speaking of hateful, here is Nov. 7th correspondence from the lovely Mr. Moneybags Jimmy Walters himself.

What does it say about Walter's intentions when The PODS and NO Plane theories are his strict criteria for involvement?
The tone of the email speaks volumes for itself.

Fair warning: Lay down with dogs, get up with fleas. Myself, I refuse to whore for certifiable nutcases. Guess that put me in the same class as one of those traitor types.

From: Jimmy Walter
To: ; William Rodriguez ; Les Jamieson
Sent: Monday, November 07, 2005 5:16 AM
Subject: Volunteers meeting in NYC.

Dear William, Les, and David, and everyone else, please pass this along.

I want to have a volunteers meeting in NYC the weekend of November 12 and 13, or before or after the meeting on Thursday.
Not only do I want to meet them, I am looking for a well organized, detail oriented person to assist William in organizing and managing our volunteers to promote the 9/11 issue.
I have given over 80% of my net worth. My money is running out. We need to raise money.

This will be a paid job, but do not come looking for top wages because this job is for a patriot, not money grubbers who do not really support the cause like Michael Thurber, Simon Aronowitz, Nick Levits, Bryan Sacks, Mike (I have forgotten his last name), who gouged us and delivered poor quality and/or outright sabotage. They did not hurt me. They hurt our countries, the world, and I consider them traitors as well as thieves. It was Nick Levits, Bryan Sacks, and their videographer Mike who caused me to drop support for the New York 9/11 truth movement. They and Kyle Hence whose is praised by (which caused me stop supporting them), are obviously working for Mossad, NSA, CIA, and/or other enemies of mankind. These are not differences of opinion, but outright subterfuge and sabotage such as Hence's promoting that there was a initial 75 foot hole at the Pentagon and ignoring that explosives were used at the WTC in all buildings. These traitors and their cohorts will attack you. Be prepared for your "friends" to attack you over issues they feel strongly about. We must accept rational criticism and difference of opinion, even the attacks. We do promote the work of others on what we agree on, even if they disagree with us. We will even support sound theories from those that attack us while admonishing them for their attacks. We ignore exaggerated and outlandish criticism such as that from Aronowitz, Levits, Hence, and Thurber for being "a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing." We do not condemn those that want and need to make money out of the movement. We only condemn money grubbing and gouging, censorship, lies, and needless or unfounded attacks on people within the movement. The other side will attack us regardless. No one is perfect. There is not enough time to pursue the real terrorists. Attacking real supporters who just disagree distracts us and works for the real terrorists. The above people that I have exposed are overtly trying to sabotage the movement. These people must be exposed. Others, however, just disagree. Recently, Lisa Pease, a lady I respect greatly, attacked Eric Hufschmid for supporting the non-suicide theory on Gary Webb saying it was obvious that he did commit suicide. I and Eric strongly disagree. I fault her only in that she went on to say how Eric, and myself by implication since I support Eric, were harmful to the movement. She is definitely wrong on that. Both of us have contributed greatly to the movement. Any mistakes we have made are honest ones, not intentional like Kyle Hence's. Lisa has done much to help the movement and I hardily support her, but not in this attack on Eric. I do not support vonKleist's pod theory since it is a meaningless diversion. The real question is what caused the incendiary flash as each plane hits. Here again, Hence and Mike what's-his-name try to distract from the obvious real issue by focusing on a non-issue. When confronted about the flash, they come up with accusations of forgery about the flash. If it is forged, CNN, the other news services, and the Naudet brothers did it, not vonKleist. The flash is in the original footage. it is obviously not static electricity and not friction. There lead was followed by the traitor Ben Chertoff after the CIA takeover of Propaganda Mechanics where he claims to cover all the claims, focuses on the pod, and never mentions the flash. If they are all telling the same lies, they must be working together.

As for some wanting to make some money while supporting the cause, go for it. Just be fair and equitable. If you are trying to get rich, work for the Repuglicans. I do not even object to people selling my free DVD for a small amount if they take them to events. To sell them online is wrong and money grubbing. Still, I will not attack or sue them since they are getting the word out - which is the only point!

The person must be able to take heavy criticism and outlandish accusations from all quarters, and be able to work with people with whom he or she does not entirely agree, including myself at times. I have Tourette's syndrome. That means that when I get angry, I shout and cuss quite a bit. It is wrong to do so, I always apologize for getting angry, but I have an incurable disease. It is not severe. I never blow up or curse at people that do as they promise, or at least try, and treat me with respect. I always give respect to other people's ideas and right to disagree no matter how high or low a position they may hold. It is I who makes myself angry since I believe irrationally it is "horrible" that people consciously try to sabotage or try to deceive me for their own goals.

If you are planning on changing me, forget it. If you are planning to get me to support some other cause, forget it. If you are planning on a free and luxurious ride, forget it. He or she must put in many, many hours. This will be a salary job, not an hourly wage. Don't complain about the hours, brag about them. I put in 100 hours per week on a slow week. I think about it all the time. I have committed my entire fortune to the cause. Compensation will be determined by need, the best for the least getting the job. My own lifestyle has changed drastically due to my greatly reduced wealth and the necessity of maintaining the prize money for the contest. Just because I am offering my last million as a prize does not mean we have an unlimited budget. In fact, it demands that we economize.

He or she must realize that volunteers require huge amounts of follow-up and encouragement. That volunteers will not do everything or even most of what they promise unless you constantly follow-up and encourage them, not scold. Patience, tolerance, and follow through are required.

I support the existence of Israel, but like our troops and America, I attack the war criminals, liars, and torturers within as the only real support that insures both our countries continued existence. SOME Israelis and Jews who are criminals and traitors will be verbally attacked, most certainly the Terrorist Likud party and the War Criminals such as Sharon and Netanyahu. I oppose Greater Israel. I oppose all religious sects that claim non-believers are going to hell or are inferior - that means many, many people of all religions except Buddhism and Hinduism which make no such claims. I am a Christian-Buddhist but I do not believe in Revelations, killing my son to prove my love for god, intelligent design or other superstitions.Matthew 5 sums up my Christian beliefs.

I have gone into this long defense of myself and job offer so that whomever gets the job knows the past and the current conditions. All of us, will be attacked by the other side and the traitors within.

jimmy Walter