Carol Brouillet Reviews Who Killed John O'Neill

Review of the Film- "Who Killed John O'Neill'"

I had organized premieres of the first documentaries on 9/11 in San Francisco, as well as the San Francisco International Inquiry into 9/11, plus two 9/11 Film Festivals last September. I had seen most of the documentaries and previews of the 9/11 documentaries in progress, but 'Who Killed John O'Neill' wasn't a documentary. It was an arty, psychological drama, with humor and surprises about the very real events of September 11th and it contained information that I hadn't come across before. I was so impressed by the film that I contacted the filmmakers and tried to include it into the program in Chicago at the very last minute. In fact, I put it in the Sunday morning slot where I had hoped to premiere my own film- 'Behind Every Terrorist- There is a Bush' and missed a press conference that Senator Boxer had invited me to attend, to make sure that the film made it into the program and that the film makers could make their travel arrangements to be in Chicago for the 'World Premiere.'
I spoke in Chicago on how social movements work and how the catalyst for all social movements is simply that 'The System Relies on Societal Myths and is Threatened by the Exposure of Societal Secrets.' The largest myth is that power holders serve society rather than 'elite interests' at tremendous cost to people and planet and in violation of deeply held social values. 9/11 is the defining event of this century and how it is understood will either institute a transnational global police state or liberate us from those who use violence, terror and war for personal power and profit. We are on the cusp of hope, with half the population believing the official story and half recognizing the cover-up. The efforts of each of us, now, to educate our fellow citizens about 9/11, reality, the media, and our efforts to organize ourselves, demand government accountability, and change policies and power-holders will determine our future. For this reason, I highly recommend that everyone see the film 'Who Killed John O'Neill' (Available online at

Check out the link for the full article. You can find the official website for Who Killed John O'Neill, as well as full length video downloads, at

Edit: You can also check it out at Podcasts here:

This movie is chock full of

This movie is chock full of info and is thorough as hell. Not another lame souped up powerpoint show either. Great production value. VERY well presented!

u2r2h, What was to be gained

u2r2h, What was to be gained in using cgi to fake one or both WTC planes?

IMO, nothing to gain, but everything to loose in getting busted! Risk/reward ratio was non-existent. The planes were drones.

We should keep this thread

We should keep this thread on topic. This is one of the best 9/11 movies to come out and really does a great job of presenting the whole "web" of deception. Definitely the best job I've seen of dot connecting so I'm sure certain people would like to derail this comment section with CGI/hologram bullshit

That should have been Kevin

That should have been Kevin Ryan...does anybody have information about Kevin Ryan of UL's educational background. Please?

No flame war needed. Most

No flame war needed. Most 911truthers agree on an Operation Northwoods style operation, with swapping of planes. Whether the planes were then bigger/smaller than the originals is possible.

What hurts the movement is the absurdity of denying the 2nd plane footage:
To spread the message, one has to appeal to common sense, and while the WTC7 videos are very convincing no matter what 10000 pages of 'magic fire research' exist, no second plane is ruled bogus by common sense.

Yes, they could have done it, but it would have been a risky and complicated technical challenge.
As long as no radar records are available that show any problem with it, there's no use in this research.

They used much simpler fakes: like the DNA identification: all they needed was a blood-sample of each of the fake/real victims, and have it tested.

You contradict

You contradict yourself.

First you say switched TO SMALLER PLANE no problem, but then you insist the footage of a 767 is genuine.

To deny the 767 footage hurts?

I think it liberates!

- there are eye-witnesses that saw different plane-type (MD80, engines either side of wings, smaller jet!)
- the impact holes do not correspond
- approach angle is different in different footage

You see.. I happen to think that ONLY WHEN we discover what went on .. a DEEP THROAT will come forward.

If someone would come forward right now, and said:

I planted mininukes and my friend fakes the videos... the movement would laugh him into his grave.


also, what do you think

also, what do you think about the THIRD PLANE?

have you seen that? ANSWER QUICK PLEASE

see, the truth is like a

see, the truth is like a broken drum.

you can't beat it.

It provides security, solidarity, commonSense (that you love so much) and best of all...

it doesn't go away, when you close your eyes :-)

Seriously. Once it has been told & accepted.. good things will happen.

Imagine how long it took for the german nazi soldiers to accept that the hitler-regime was criminal... some never did... they rather lived the lie of having been honourable soldiers. Now transpose this to today. Can you honestly tell an US soldier in Iraq that he is partaking in a crime, and he should repent and recant and pay reparations?

see how outlandish it sounds! This is the state of mind you are in!

Steve Kangas: His web site,

Steve Kangas: His web site, Liberalism Resurgent, was meticulously researched and presented such a problem to the "real boss" of George Bush, Richard Scaife, that he hired a private detective to look into Kangas' past. Steve Kangas was found in a 39th-floor bathroom outside of Scaife's offices at One Oxford Centre, in Pittsburgh, an apparent suicide. Mr. Kangas, a very prolific writer, left no note. He had brought a fully-packed suitcase of clothes with him to Pittsburgh. He bought a burglar alarm shortly before he left for Pittsburgh. Why did he need a burglar alarm if he was going to commit suicide? An avowed advocate of gun control, he nevertheless bought a gun. What was he afraid of? Why did he go to Pittsburgh? After his death, his computer was sold for $150 and its hard drive wiped clean. Everything in his apartment was thrown away.

Archbishop Oscar Romero:

Archbishop Oscar Romero: Archbishop Romero was a true hero, speaking out against atrocities by a Bush/Reagan backed fascist government. He refused to appear in public with any army or government personnel, and was a voice for the thousands of tortured, slaughtered and oppressed in El Salvador. He was shot in the back while preparing Mass. The death of Archbishop Romero is one among many. There is not enough space to list the hundreds of thousands who died under Reagan/Bush-backed, right-wing governments.

OK, I'm gonna try this

OK, I'm gonna try this question 1 more time. Has anyone bought and received "Improbable Collapse"? Does anyone know if the pushed back release date of 5/15/06 has caused a delay? I ordered it over a month ago.

Yes, Nico haupt (ewing2001)

Yes, Nico haupt (ewing2001) was
on Webster Tarpley...

Nico made a lot of sense there. I know you would censor him if you could. You think ENTOMOPTER oh my god! But if you want to uproot the plot, you must know HOW EXACTLY it happened. Nico has progressed... others have crawled or stagnated in their research.

Listen to it with an open mind, and try to ponder the event logically.

If explosives/thermite/mate/nano
how did they plant 14 tons of it?

(to create the dust

it needed

that much!)

Think logically!!

next: The IMPACT HOLE:

So it is clear that IT WAS NO BOEING.

logically follows: Videos are fake, NOPLANERS (better: NO767ers) are right.

May the flame-war begin, grin ;-)

No, honestly. this discussion needs to be held. Jeff King said in clear terms why!!

Hey T-Bone, i think i went

Hey T-Bone, i think i went to their site, and at the main page it mentions that because new footage was available, and new people to interview, they pushed it back. I think they forgot to change the initial release date. Check on that.

9/11 is the defining event

9/11 is the defining event of this century and how it is understood will either institute a transnational global police state or liberate us from those who use violence, terror and war for personal power and profit.

Ha ha ha.. Liberation after 9/11 is uncovered.. ha ha ha .. YOU DREAMER!!!

unless "the movement" is

- disciplined (scott ritter)
- clued up, myth-immune (chomsky)
- active (the girls)
- solidaric (Graeber, Parenti)

the LIBERATION must fail.

It wouldn't even be like Germany in 1919.

Can you imagine what the corporations would do? I tell you!! They would be:

- disciplined
- clued up
- active
- solidaric


I really enjoyed the film

I really enjoyed the film and it provided some information I was not aware of. Most new 9/11 movies cover information I'm familiar with at this point.

great magazine, check it out if its in a store near you. fuck the media.

Another Huffpo article on

Another Huffpo article on 9/11.
CLAIM vs FACT: Whitehouse on 9/11 Illnesses.

I'm trying to post there,

I'm trying to post there, but it's not letting me.

huffpo always takes a while

huffpo always takes a while for the comments to post.

Check this out... Lawrence

It seems I can no longer

It seems I can no longer post comments on DailyKos. If I submit a comment on my diary, I get "Failed". (Perhaps the same thing would happen if I submitted a diary.)

They are pathetic.

I posted a comment on

I posted a comment on Huffpo, at the "Intelligence Chief says..." thread at 4:30.
It's still up.

i just saw Curt Weldon on

i just saw Curt Weldon on The Newshour spouting off about how horrible the New York Times is for reporting on yet another over-reaching and borderline illegal program by the Bush administration. i gotta say Jon, maybe its not such a bad thing that Weldon isnt gonna meet with you, the guy is like a brick wall. hes a "true believer" in the war on terror.

You can watch snowjob talk

You can watch snowjob talk about the leak...


Does anyone have information

Does anyone have information about David Ryan's educational background? Does he, for instance, hold an advanced degree?

You can watch snowjob talk

You can watch snowjob talk about the leak...

Jon Gold | Homepage | 06.26.06 - 7:08 pm | #
no thanks, ive seen enough bootlickers threaten our democracy and media for one wonder our media is a bunch of fucking cowards......

Well, would you look at

Well, would you look at that. The President himself told us what to do in order to find the "terrorists" responsible for 9/11.

"The 9/11 Commission recommended that the Government be robust in tracing money. If you want to figure out what the Terrorist are doing, you try to follow their money."

Interesting that he's quoting the 9/11 Commission which stated in their report:

"To date, the U.S. government has not been able to determine the origin of the money used for the 9/11 attacks. Ultimately the question is of little practical significance... Similarly, we have seen no evidence that any foreign government - or foreign government official - supplied any funding." (p. 172)

He says it at the very end of this press conference...

BYU physics professor Steven

BYU physics professor Steven Jones' authoritative lecture on the use of incendiary devices in the demolition of the trade towers and building 7 went further than ever before in its conclusive tone on the issue. Jones has now tested steel samples from two different sites that both clearly show the use of thermate as a tool of implosion and the analysis has been verified by two other universities.


anybody know what 2

anybody know what 2 universities?

Orlando Letelier: He was

Orlando Letelier: He was torn to bits by a car bomb on the streets of Washington DC just before he was to testify about the Chilean dictator Pinochet. After the bombing, CIA Director George H. W. Bush told the FBI that there had been no Chilean involvement whatsoever. In 1991 the post-Pinochet Chilean Supreme Court asked George H. W. Bush if he would submit to questioning. He refused.

Amiram Nir: He was a former Israeli agent who was in Jerusalem with George Bush during Iran Contra. He went under the assumed name of Pat Weber. Nir was scheduled to testify to the Senate subcommittee and it was feared he would reveal the truth. He perished, following the shooting-down of his aircraft with missiles from the helicopter of a man called Gene Tatum, 25-year CIA deep cover agent.

Senator John Tower: He was appointed by the Reagan/Bush Administration to chair the bipartisan committee to investigate the Iran/Contra scandals. He directed the Tower Report and had all the Iran Contra documents and knew the inside of the story. He was killed in an uninvestigated airplane crash later in Georgia in 1991. Also killed was his daughter, Marian.

President John Fitzgerald

President John Fitzgerald Kennedy: An internal FBI memo reported that on November 22 a reputable businessman named George H. W. Bush reported hearsay that a certain Young Republican had been talking of killing the president when he came to Houston. The Young Republican was nowhere near Dallas on that date. According to a 1988 story in The Nation, J. Edgar Hoover said in a memo that Mr. George Bush of the CIA had been briefed on November 23rd, 1963 about the reaction of anti-Castro Cuban exiles in Miami to the assassination of President Kennedy. George H. W. Bush has denied this, although he was in Texas at the time and cannot account for his whereabouts at the time.

Barry Seal: He was supposedly murdered by Medellin cartel members, but a 6-month investigation by Sam Dalton, attorney for three of the accused murderers, into Mr. Seal's life and death uncovered some interesting points. The accused's cartel connections were well known, but not their association with Oliver North's enterprise. Mr. Seal was a drug smuggler, up to his armpits in smuggling cocaine for - guess who? - the CIA. During the penalty phase of the Columbians' trial, testimony by one government witness on the activities of Mr. Seal was so damaging to the government, that 2 of the jurors wanted to change their verdict to "not guilty". The personal telephone number of George H. W. Bush was found in the trunk of Mr. Seal's car.

sorry, im done.

Chris, it is weird, but

Chris, it is weird, but poppy is behind everything. Tarpley even had some shit in his book about how Hinckley or one of his relatives was a friend of the Bush family and it almost made you think twice about whether poppy was in on the attempted hit.

all roads lead to H.W, thats

all roads lead to H.W, thats for sure.
and yes, Hinckley was supposed to or actually did have dinner with Neil Bush(i believe, or maybe it was one of the other hell spawns).George H.W Bush was in on it. i dont rust tom Flocco for too much(except for whats verifiable) but take a look at the man in this picture.

FBI memo, photo link Bush Sr

FBI memo, photo link Bush Sr to JFK Dallas murder scene

last night I listened again

last night I listened again to Nico and PlaguePuppy on Tarpley RBNLIVE.

there is a segment where J King rants about the demolitino science.

I think this is pretty profound, and, as such, worth listening to MORE OFTEN (regularly!) and TRANSMITTING IT TO OTHERS.

I repeat:

J.King Demolition rant = MUST HEAR AGAIN AND AGAIN

(Dust, forces, material, energy == very good explanantion, fine words.)

Nico was on with tarpley?

Nico was on with tarpley? did i read that right? what a damn shame.....

IMO, nothing to gain, but

IMO, nothing to gain, but everything to loose in getting busted! Risk/reward ratio was non-existent. The planes were drones.

The gain would be the fact that it make the 911-deceptiopn possible

I assume one CAN NOT fly a real 767 into the towers.

I can only speculate why not:

- You cannot do it with a pilot on board
- There is no clandestine 767 at hand.
- it could go wrong

The THIRD plane


could have beamed the laser onto the crystal which illuminated the water(?) droplet cloud surrounding the
missile/MilitaryBusinesJet (eye witness SAW md80-like plane)

Check the WTC impact circumstances at this very perceptive site:

No sooner than we find out HOW THEY DID IT we can find out WHO DID 911!!!

Although I can't vouch for

Although I can't vouch for everything contained in [i]Who Killed John O'Neill?[/i], I thought that it was a brilliant, near genius film.

The only thing that I didn't like were a few of the links in the credits that viewers were directed toward for further study regarding 9/11; as I do not trust them.

Other than that, I thought the film was brilliantly written, directed, recorded, edited etc. I think that it's near genius.

u2r2h--"I assume one CAN NOT

u2r2h--"I assume one CAN NOT fly a real 767 into the towers."

You assume wrongly & sound very foolish! Why the hell couldn't a 767 drone fly into the towers???

Now transpose this to today.

Now transpose this to today. Can you honestly tell an US soldier in Iraq that he is partaking in a crime, and he should repent and recant and pay reparations?

see how outlandish it sounds! This is the state of mind you are in!

This is the post of the month!
In fact the US soldiers have a big time over there, white trash people now holding a gun and deciding who will be killed, tortured or not.

The onlt problem is when they got whisked without limbs in Walter Reed hospital and realize many post treatment and social programmes have been cut for veterans..

But it's their war afterall they deserve it plain and simple.

WKJO is disinfo. Actually,

WKJO is disinfo. Actually, it's not just disinfo (John O'Neill was famous for tracking Osama bin Laden, who had nothing whatsoever to do with 9/11! Oops...), it's caustic disinfo, also aimed at getting inside the heads of 9/11 truthers.

AFAIC, WKJO is a sophisticated CIA-like (almost certainly the work of a pro-coverup intelligence agency as part of a limited hangout) production.

So I find it fitting for cute disinfo agent Carol Brouillet (she's running for Congress as some kind of 911 truther, but won't pledge to question Bush about Bush's repeated incriminating self-implicating 9/11 witness statements!!! Oops...) to be reviewing WKJO.

(mock horror) But how can you say such a thing about George Bush, er, Carol Brouillet? Think of how much s/he has done for our nation/movement! Carol's watered-down approach to promoting selectively weak 9/11 facts and evidence has been performed with great enthusiasm and dedication, but it's got to be about the message, not the messenger, folks.

Even if WKJO were not such a caustic septic piece of disinformative propaganda, your time would still be better spend reviewing some of the 9/11 evidence -- much of it the same evidence which has been suppressed, ignored, omitted, and disregarded by the 9-11 Commission and the 911truth movement alike! -- at (For instance, how many of you have seen the widely-separated WTC1 explosions which were coincident not only with each other but also with the WTC2 fireball? Speaking of the WTC2 fireball: Oops...)