Demand a Real Investigation of 9/11!

As the democrats prepare to take control of the House and Senate, we the people need to inundate Nancy Pelosi with letters and faxes demanding a re-investigation of the attacks which occurred on September 11, 2001.

Many are calling for the impeachment of George W. Bush, when what we really should be demanding is a legitimate investigation into the facts of the events which occurred on September 11, 2001. When these facts come to light, impeachment will be the very least of George W. Bush’s concerns.

With 84% of Americans believing that the official version of the events of 9/11 are not true, there are literally tens of millions who should support a real investigation. We need to get a fraction of them to take action by DEMANDING that the Bush & Cheney administration be held accountable.

Fax or snail mail the letter below or your own variation to:

FAX: 202-225-8259

Nancy Pelosi
2371 Rayburn HOB
Washington, DC 20515

District Office:

450 Golden Gate Ave.
14th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94102

Emails are nice, but letters and faxes make a physical pile that form a powerful visual that is far more difficult to ignore, much less delete.

Speaker Pelosi,

The American people elected a Democratic majority to restore checks and balances, the rule of law, and our reputation as a law-abiding country in the world community. These noble aims cannot be accomplished unless the truth of the events which occurred on September 11, 2001 are FULLY investigated and the responsible parties held to account.

For the last five years, President George W. Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney have done everything in their power to avoid a legitimate investigation into the facts surrounding the events of September 11, 2001. Why? Perhaps an even more important question is why so many Americans remain unaware of many of the indisputable facts concerning that fateful day.

The truth of the following events is already supported with evidence in the public record. It is likely that a legitimate investigation would turn up even more evidence of what really occurred on September 11, 2001. Only then can we take the proper steps to insure that something like this never happens again.

What occurred on September 11th, 2001 is a matter of facts, physics and unprecedented violations of national protocol by American officials themselves. Here are a few points to consider. There are hundreds more.

1. No steel-framed building before or since 9/11 has ever collapsed due to fire.

2. No official agency (FAA, FBI, or the airlines) has ever released a list of the 9/11
passengers. But within hours, the FBI released a list of the hijackers.

3. Multiple air-defense drills were planned for the morning of 9/11. These exercises
left only two fighter jets available to protect the entire Northeastern United States.

4. Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper and part of the World Trade Center complex, was
not struck by a plane but collapsed in 6.5 seconds at 5:20 p.m. on September 11th, in
the exact manner of a controlled demolition.

5. There was no visible airplane debris where Flight 93 supposedly crashed in
Pennsylvania – only a smoking hole in the ground, much like a bomb crater.

6. Office fires burn at low temperatures of 600-800 dF. Jet fuel is an ordinary
hydrocarbon; its maximal burning temperature is 1200 dF in open air. Steel melts at
2750 dF. Neither jet fuel nor the burning contents of the buildings could cause the
towers’ steel structure to buckle or fail.

7. Tests have shown that cell-phone calls cannot be made at altitudes over 4000 to
8000 feet, as cell towers are located on the ground. Commercial airplanes fly at
30,000 feet and above. No passenger could have successfully placed a call for help
by cell phone from an airborne plane on 9/11, as reported.

8. 9/11 was immediately declared an “act of war” by President Bush. The rubble from
the Twin Towers’ collapse was carted away and the steel sold and shipped overseas
without examination.

9. Enormous profits were made by insiders on plummeting stock prices of the two
airlines involved in 9/11 – American and United. Federal law protects their identities.

10. Accepting victims’ compensation barred 9/11 families from further discovery
through litigation.

Listen to the American people so we can be confident we have a democracy again. Launch a REAL investigation of the events which occurred on September 11, 2001.


Your Name Here

Pentagon Boeing 757 wreckage

What is really funny, I mean really funny about the information reguarding the wreckage of AA77 is people will ask if it is a part of the plane.

I don't care if it's an engine part of a Boeing 757 or a Messerschmitt Bf109. The dam thing has been dismantaled by human hands with mechanical tools.

You come upon an accident, this car is suspose to be the culpret. You look under the hood and the engine is stripped down to it's block. Carburater gone, manifold gone, exhaust manifold gone, spark plugs gone, head gone. I mean stripped! Now this car was suspose to be street racing a few minutes ago?

So all the evidence, eye witnesses, radar, camera video footage, lightpoles, lawns, all of it don't mean a dam thing.

The aircraft parts were taken apart and planted. No ammount of speed, no ammount of blunt force, no ammount of heat is going to unscrew and mechanically take apart these pieces other than a human using sockets, wrenches, plyers and other assorted tools... peroid. Your busted... end of story!

Interesting angle on the Pentagon

This is an interesting post. I think you should write a blog about it and add some photos to illustrate what you're describing.

Elementry my dear Watson

What's there to blog about? It's as plan, It's simple. It's elementry. Not one piece of aircraft wreckage was "found" that could not be "man handled" into place. Whole engines, entire landing gear can not be "man handled" so they have to "part-it-out" in order for it to be planted. If one piece is found to have been "planted" then the entire 9-11 crumbles to the ground.

I'm searching for examples...

But I'm coming up empty.

A picture or two would help us better understand where you're coming from.

I see you just recently registered. Welcome to the party Rick. Glad to have you on board.


Hang tight, thanks for the congrads

Yo Chris

Here's the deal. AA77 did not crash into the Pentagon and mechanically dismantle it's self.

Back to automotive illistrations. It takes mechanical engineering to dismantle the Pentagon Parts photographed and displayed for the world to judge.

It would take hours for a human to strip the parts I see.

These parts are not gong to fall off.

The idea is clear

but i don't think I've ever looked at the pics with that in mind. That's why a blog would be good. Just pictures and some text.


I'm working on it, but killtown has a much better site and I think that this information would be better illistrated if killtown would explore it. Keep checking with killtown. I'm impressed with his work, but keep it between us. I don't want him to know that I'm a fan. Okay?


yes, some further explanation along with pictures is warranted here...and would be very much appreciated!

How about saying there is no plane debris there

that couldn't have easily been planted before or after.


Focus on the botched crash scene at Shanksville.

Planting Parts

In another part of the Pentagon? Yea it would look kinda funny wheeling in aircraft parts down main central Hallway, but in an area where construction is going on? We know the "punch-out" photograph didn't happen on 9-11 because the broken bricks have been painted over. These holes had been drilled out previously and it would be easy to bring these parts in as construction equipment or materials.

couldn't have easily been planted before or after

Who said the Engine Part , Landing Gear and Wheel were found in the Pentagon?

There is one thing for certaint, these parts didn't end up inside the Pentagon because they were flown there under there own power.

If they did get to the Pentagon, then they were brought in by truck and placed there by hand. If that was a problem then they could have been staged elsewhere. Last they could have PhotoShopped in. Whatever the case may be, the parts that are presented by our government as proof of Flight 77 fails in that the parts I see could not have come from a operational engine or landing gear at the time it came to a rest.

These parts were taken apart by human intent and that is the final assessment.

No human can come up with any other reasionable explination other than sabatoge of the evidence by the forger to alert any other observant individual as to the fakery of the entire 9-11 plot. There is absolutly no possable way that the holes in the Pentagon and wreackage have been an isolated intent. Once it is shown that the jet engine was dismantled in a mechanical manor all of 9-11 conspiracy is exposed.
It simply can not be any other way.

You'll be tagged on #5 - Flight 93

for saying "no visible airplane debris where Flight 93 supposedly crashed", but I know what you're trying to get at.

Say instead something like none of the tall grass around the crater was burned and the burnt forest section was mostly burned later that's why no video aerials where taken of the forest section on 9/11. Also the Black Boxes located in the tail section were "found 15 & 25ft" underground, yet there is only a faint tail impression in the grass that didn't penetrate the ground, yet no tail.


Focus on the botched crash scene at Shanksville.

Hey Killtown

I bet you don't have the faintest idea what the squiggly line in the Pentagon Security Camera # 2 frame 025 is.

Go check out M1A1 Abrams tanks firing their 120mm cannons. Just after the blast, they blow out the burnt gun powder.

The squiggly line that is suspose to be an airplane is not even a part of the photograph.

The security camera wasn't even shot on 9-11.

I'm sorry, which frame?

Can you post the frame, or is it in the youtube videos?


Focus on the botched crash scene at Shanksville.

Yo Killtown

Waite one - it will be worth it.

Is this worth the wait?

Two camera's at the Pentagon, No 1 (forward) No. 2 (Rear). There are five(5) vehicles seen in No. 1 video. Two(2) are driving on the On-Ramp to Washington Boulvard. The other three(3) are driving on the sidewalk. No. 3 vehicle is the Security car that drives thru and No. 5 vehicle is the Van that drives thru in the end of the video. There is a person walking around on the lawn. And a Security vehicle drives across the lawn while another security vehicle drives on the lawn on the far side. There are Six(6) vehicles in operation and no less than seven(7) humans active in these frames. There is a human stanging out in the middle of the lawn just after the big explosion, utterly impossiable mind you, and the funniest thing is, there is a guard rail on the inner side of the sidewalk yet, these cars drive along the sidewalk and we can plainly see that they are not behind the guardrail and the security car gives the entire sabang away by driving thru the guardrail as if it isn't there because.... the guardrail isn't there. Now ain't that some sh*t?

Camera 2 - Frame 00:25 + DOD + Flight 77 = U.S. Department of Defense Official Website - FOIA Office > Videos of American Flight 77 striking the Pentagon on September 11, 2001
Video 1 (WMV)
Video 2 (WMV)

The squiggly line, that puff of smoke, that obscure Boeing 757 of Flight 77 is actually the smoke that is pushed out of a M1A1 Abrams MBT after firing a round. It is an image that has been PhotoShopped in to the frame. If it were a part of the image, then there would be a shadow on the grass just below it. There is not a shadow. Okay for the record, Yes the sun is at an angle, but...Judging from all other shadows it would have been visable. If there is no accompaining shadow for the image presented means theae two images can not occupy the same space in time.

Two eyes and attention to the details.

It is nice to see another voice of simple truth regarding video forgery.

Shadows always blow the cover.

There are numerous anomalies in this video (as you may also find in on other 9/11 videos).

caution: simple physics has been known to upset some on this site :)


Thanks for the heads up. As for physics, Camera #1 and Camera #2 both record the grass being burnt to a crisp just under the projectory and remaning burnt for the rest of the footage. But when I view photos of the lawn just after the explosion I do not find any. But only the aerial and satilight photos show the repair of lawn damage at, about and on the exact projectory in the porported 9-11 footage. What ever was taking place in the Pentagon security footage happened before the railing was installed and the lawn repaired.

Waz-up with the smoke and missing frames?

Camera #2 Frame 00:25 has the squiggly smoke that is obivously not a part of the photograph, but I have to wonder just what was the PhotoShopper thinking. Whoever forged the Pentagon Security Camera footage put this "squiggly smoke" to bring our attention to it. First I believe that it "masks" what is happening behind it, and second I believe that it was put there as a subliminal message for all of us. There really is no other image that fits a M1A1 Abrams 120mm cannon expelling burt gasses. If it were me and I was ordered against my will to conduct the forgery, I'd sabatoge it. I believe that the reason why the Pentagon Security Camera foot age is so blantly bad forgery is simply a true patroit geting by and leaving the rest of us to pick up on the clues left behind.


Many have suggested this (insertion of obvious errors)regarding several videos.

Given the blatant (to all who look closely) nature of the forgeries it appears this may well be the case.

Unfortunately, for whatever reason, many seem curiously unable to see even the most obvious of forgeries. Perhaps such realities (video forgeries) conflict with their previous understanding of the events and they are unwilling to reconsider these beliefs in light of new information, instead opting for doublethink: "I see the forgeries/ There are no forgeries". It can be difficult to reason with such individuals. Good luck.

God can't be serious

Let me get this stright. GOD, The Bible, Revelations. When Revelations says that God is going to send "a great dellusion" I was hoping for a little something.. well, augh something more Godlike. I don't know what but I didn't expect blatant stupidity. My God, some futuristic alian is going to uncover our history and learn that the NewWorldOrder was ushered in using apallingly bad forgeries and the vast majority believed this lie? Man, I'd expect at least a better lie. This is embarrasing. I don't believe it! I'm ashamed to be a human! One of the most stupid creatures in the universe. Any person with access to a computer has more power under the hood than any human in the history of mankind yet we can't figure this out? How many episodes of CSI: do you need to watch not to figure it out? We are all lost!

Many cannot figure out what they don't want to figure out.

Confronted with the truth, many choose to return to their blissful ignorance.

Lost? Not yet.

Video forgery remains "the elephant in the room".

i bet yall heard this

i bet yall heard this one.....

the engine found down the street from the wtc attack belonged to a different kind of plane than a 767----

a newspaper article with pictures

Please provide a link to support your assertion.

Thank you.

The truth shall set us free. Love is the only way forward.