Tesla did some deep thinking in his later years, and realized that whatever source of energy He could put out there, the government was right there seeking keen interest. This meant they were interested only in military applications, and Tesla rightly knew that sinister use of his ideas would lead to massive destruction along with absolute power. He destroyed all records himself. The guy was a genius, for sure, but He knew that unless the corporate world (such as J.P. Morgan) could not influence government policy, then his inventions would be used for destruction.

The master class has always declared the wars; the subject class has always fought the battles.

Most of you appear to think that Steve Jones has "explained" what happend to the World Trade Center buildings, even though he has never said anything about WTC-3, WTC-4, WTC-5, and WTC-6. In fact, he still continues to misrepresent what happened to the Twin Towers as a "collapse" when it was principally a "pulverization". The evidence about their destruction cannot be explained on the basis of conventional explosives alone. He most certainly has not done it, in case you haven't noticed. If you don't understand this elementary point, which Judy Wood has made so unmistakably clear, you probably should find other ways to spend your copious free time. I have the feeling most of you think that conclusions in science are merely a matter of community consensus or of popular vote! Why not exercise your minds by reviewing my exchange with Steve from Chandler and try to figure out who's right and who's wrong and why? Most of the comments on this and other threads are ad hominem, repetitive, and boring. They appear to be motived by ignorance and myopia, an unwillingness to exercise your minds to consider a broader range of hypotheses than those you think that you understand. Well, if you believe thermite/thermate brought down the towers, i am afraid that you are even worse off than those who know nothing, because what you think you know is wrong! For once in your life, try following logic and evidence as it is presented here. Maybe you can't concentrate for an hour and fifteen, but that is the challege. Stop shooting off your mouths and study the evidence for a change. Who know? You just might learn something. Because what you are doing with all this nastiness and venom about people who are better qualified than you are to deal with these matters simply makes you look very silly! 9/11 truth can't go anywhere on the basis of one more myth. Ask Steve to explain how his account can explain the "collapse" of the towers, the pulverization of the dust, the rate of demolition, and all that. He won't tell you, but the honest answer is, "He can't!" If you want the truth about 9/11, you are going to have to look elsewhere. I am sorry to be the one to disillusion you--most won't be capable of appreciating what I am telling you anyway, to judge by the quality of the intellects on display here--but that is the score. I understand that the motives that drive most of these posts have nothing to do with science but reflect mediocre minds striking out at things that lie beyond their ken. If you had even a feeble grasp of the issues of logic and evidence involved here, you would not put up such rubbish.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=9046804812765633069