Richard Gage to Be Interviewed on Two Arizona Radio Stations

Be sure to catch the following radio interviews of Richard Gage, coinciding with his upcoming Phoenix and Tucson speaking engagements:

Date: Sat, Nov 24, 2007

Time: 5:00 PM - 6:00 PM MST

Topic: How did the 3 WTC high-rise building "collapse" on 9/11

Station: KJLL 1330 AM

Location: Tucson, AZ

Program: Gnosis

Interviewer: Chuck Aubrey

Interviewee: Richard Gage, AIA

Online: www.tucsonsjolt.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Mon, Nov 26, 2007

Time: 5:00-6:00 PM PST

Topic: How the 3 WTC Buildings "Collapse"

Station: KPHX 1480 AM; call-in number : 602-258-8800

Location: Phoenix, AZ

Program: The Jeff Farias Show
www.jefffarias.com

Interviewer: Jeff Farias

Interviewee: Richard Gage, AIA

Online: www.jefffarias.com

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Jeff

Me likes Jeff

Any insight on these shows/hosts?

Any insight or background that might be useful?

"The important thing is to not stop questioning" - Einstein
"Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance" - Einstein
Many hands make light work!
RRREMA=realize, recognize, reconcile, educate, motivate, activate

Rock on

Keep up the great work Rich !!
Just kidding with the Rich 'Pipe Bomb' Gage comment.
(Sorry about that - Hope you can still get a passport.)
(Sue the pricks)

This is very good news!

Excellent.

Richard Gage's mission in AE911truth.org is getting more and more coverage.

This is a very important trend that we need to encourage and STRONGLY support.

For nay sayers, such as any supporters of the Simon Wiesenthal Center which presents 9/11 sites alongside radical Jihadist sites to House Hearing on "Terrorism and the Internet" ( http://911blogger.com/node/12505), just look at Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth Excellent Mission Statement.

http://www.ae911truth.org/info/4

Why are Architects and Engineers Re-examining the WTC Collapses?
— Richard Gage, AIA

The 6 years since 9/11/01 has given us the time and space to emerge from the hypnotic trance of the shocks of these attacks and to rationally evaluate the existing and new evidence that has become available.

Architects and Engineers are trained to design buildings that function well and withstand potentially destructive forces. However, the 3 high-rise buildings at the World Trade Center which "collapsed" on 9/11 (the Twin Towers plus WTC Building #7) presented us with a body of evidence (i.e.controlled demolition) that was clearly outside the scope of our training and experience.

In addition, the shock that hit us on that date from the repeated attacks and staggering loss of life has limited our ability to rationally evaluate what really happened. We therefore found ourselves relying solely upon the judgment of outside "experts"...

and, quite willing to, "go along" with the collective myth that has unfolded: that "the buildings failed structurally due to the aircraft impacts and resulting fires". After all, we saw the aircraft slam into the
building, the resulting huge fireball, and the ensuing "collapses".

There is however a growing body of very solid evidence regarding these "collapses" that has emerged in the last couple of years - gaining ground even in the mainstream media. This new evidence casts grave doubt upon the theories of the 9/11 building collapse "experts" as well as the official reports by the 9/11 Commission, FEMA, and NIST.

It lays out a solid convincing case which architects & engineers will readily see: that the 3 WTC high-rise buildings were destroyed by both classic and novel forms of controlled demolition. You will find the evidence here in our website as well as at the linked websites. We hope you will find the courage and take the necessary time to review each section thoroughly.

After all, if in fact these buildings were professionally demolished with explosives, and since it takes months of planning and engineering to place the explosives, and since these buildings were highly secure from the likes of terrorists, then we are presented with a horrible conclusion that we can not deny: that this entire event could only have been planned and orchestrated by some element(s) within the U.S. Government. The questions raised are therefore numerous and ominous that must be answered in the context of a truly independent congressional investigation with subpoena power. We can play a very significant role as building professionals because we have the necessary technical credibility that Congress will respond to. Please join us in calling for a re-investigation.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth is neither a "terrorist" organization or a disinfo organization.

On the contrary, they are using hard science to ask some very difficult questions which many 911 Family Members are also asking.

Not to mention these guys - www.patriotsquestion911.com

Let's give Richard Gage our Full Support and contact local, state & federal politicians to voice concerns on this outrageous and immoral discrimination against scientific enquiry and investigation.

Are we back in the days of the Spanish Inquisition?

Will we see more Galileos imprisoned because of their scientific worldview?

We have to prevent that.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The CONSTITUTION is NOT going to "collapse" into pulverized dust no matter how much thermate/explosives or planes they throw at it

Expect Hecklers

Richard,

I'd expect disruptive and disrespectful appearances by Stephen Lemmons of The Phoenix New Times and Pat Curley of Screw Loose Change (both reside near Phoenix from my research), and/or Ryan "maccy" Mackay of JREF at the AZ appearances.

Just so you know what to expect, see the "troofer" posts over at PHX NT from July-Aug 2007:

http://blogs.phoenixnewtimes.com/bastard/2007/08/the_history_channel_pul...

http://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/2007-08-09/news/the-yoda-of-9-11/#comments

http://blogs.phoenixnewtimes.com/bastard/2007/08/he_aint_no_michelle_mal...

http://blogs.phoenixnewtimes.com/bastard/2007/08/troofer_lies_over_wtc7_...

http://blogs.phoenixnewtimes.com/bastard/2007/08/noam_chomsky_and_the_91...

http://blogs.phoenixnewtimes.com/bastard/2007/08/why_david_ray_griffin_i...

He seems to have quit bashing 9/11 Truth after my single comment on 9-12-2007 at:
http://blogs.phoenixnewtimes.com/bastard/2007/09/yoda_aka_phxs_pat_curle...

I had my posts held, edited after the fact, and "maccy"'s comments re-time stamped at 16:10 and 16:20 and inserted above my "16:49" reply over there (and I have the .PDFs on my hard drive to prove it Mr. Lemmons- it is called a PDF writer- not all that high-tech or rare)

Good luck and great work Richard,
d

EDIT: Go prepared my friend.

Correction: Time of Interview is Misquoted for Gnosis

For those catching the Gnosis show, please make a note of the following correction:

Chuck Aubrey and the Gnosis show is on the air from 6:00pm to 7:00pm Mountain Standard Time.

NOT from 5:00pm to 6:00 pm.