WeAreCHANGE Confronts Democrats at press conferance
Brian WeAreChange Thu, 06/26/2008 - 3:47pm
Gary Talis and Mathew Lapacek confront Congressman Weiner, Congress woman Jackson and Bill Clinton's propagandist Lanny Davis.
- Brian WeAreChange's blog
- Login to post comments
Good job.
I'm a little disappointed in Sheila.
Do these people deserve to know how and why their loved ones were murdered? Do we deserve to know how and why 9/11 happened?
Very Revealing
Anthony Wiener disappointed me - I thought he was sympathetic. That's why We Are Change is really doing a service showing us that most of our Congress needs to be replaced. Robin, they asked questions in a polite way this time and the result was the same - control freak answers from sociopaths. It's important that we all know where these politicians receive their marching orders. So authoritariian.
I think...
Sheila attended the 2005 9/11 Congressional Briefing.
Do these people deserve to know how and why their loved ones were murdered? Do we deserve to know how and why 9/11 happened?
Weiner is a fraud. He & Chuck Schumer both say it's up to the
Feds to help the sick & dying first responders. They could all be dead before the Feds can be compelled to do anything!
Weiner & Schumer are our representatives in Washington. They need to divert some of those billions of $$$ that we send to Israel every year to help our own right here at home!
(Note also how Weiner invokes the fake Democrats vs. Republicans paradigm as a smoke screen to change the subject. Yeah Wiener, all we need to do is vote for Democrats and our problems are solved. Sure.)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Consider mass emailing truth messages. More info here: http://www.911blogger.com/node/13321
Sheila attended the Bill Maher Show on 10/19/07
Thanks to We Are Change and their efforts at the show that night both Sheila and Chris Matthews can't claim ignorance on the issue of Building 7.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B5BJzEshMes
The Logan Act
Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't an individual in violation of the Logan Act, only if any private communication with a foreign government or agent is not authorized?
Wouldn't one have to prove that authorization was not given before alleging that another party is in violation of the Logan Act?
§ 953. Private correspondence with foreign governments.
Any citizen of the United States, wherever he may be, who, without authority of the United States, directly or indirectly commences or carries on any correspondence or intercourse with any foreign government or any officer or agent thereof, with intent to influence the measures or conduct of any foreign government or of any officer or agent thereof, in relation to any disputes or controversies with the United States, or to defeat the measures of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.
The economy
The United States is like an old dog that knows it's about to get slapped.
Polite is better...
Asking questions politely is better.
Now they are all on the record for future use if things go the way that we want.
Its always best to let others see thecharacter of people and make the assessment themselves...without any "crank" added by the questioner.
Robin Hordon