Support 911Blogger


Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff says False-flag Terrorism an Imaginary Threat - Philly 9/11 Truth

Philly 9/11 Truth Confronts Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff

View transcript of the entire event conveniently on the Dept. of Homeland Security's website
http://www.dhs.gov/xnews/speeches/sp_1224524493787.shtm

I would almost laugh

I would almost laugh considering the blog immediately before this one, but the subject is too serious and ends up just pissing me off.

Excellent Confrontation

A quick, level-headed, fact filled delivery that gains the respect of the viewer.

The aggressive approach too often gains the viewers sympathy for the one being questioned.

Good job...


Do these people deserve to know how and why their loved ones were murdered? Do we deserve to know how and why 9/11 happened?

Smart Question

The questioner did an excellent job and as usual the response by the "official" made zero sense.

Cherty has got it down

The laughing response to his joke takes away from the seriousness of the question. "Next question please"... I have seen this tool used by many of our (mis)leaders who are confronted.

Philly Truth..way to take it to them!

Chertoff is discounting false flag terrorism even though history is replete with confirmed cases of using it to manipulate public opinion.

I was pleased that you confronted him on the anthrax case. That must be a sore subject with those who are trying to perpetuate the myth.

Good work Philly 9/11 Truth!

Meanwhile they are ramping up the fear in the MSM. They have the audacity to use the term "Al CIAda Spectactular" to describe what they are warning us to be afraid of. Could this be from the same creative department that brought us "Shock and Awe"?

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/asia/article5241036.ece

Little doubt here...

There is little doubt that the points about "false-flag-ops" that we are making are hitting HARD at the HI PERPS' cores of their strategy and the efficacy of their attempts to control the masses.

Just think for a minute...WHAT IF...

...all the false-flag-ops in this country's past leading up to the "next wars" actually HAD NOT WORKED...and the masses had seen through them in ways that 9/11 Truthers can see through them right now...

...and just said NO!!!...

...NO Mr. Pentagon, I'm NOT buying your lies about these fabricated enemies that YOU think we have to attack and murder so that you can keep justified your decadent military "killing apparatus" budget...NO!!!

This "false-flag-ops" point is the Holy Grail when reaching the Peace Movement' Peaceniks [not the hacked leadership...they are throwaways right now]... because once the peace "commoners" connect these dots, they are not only getting what the 9/11 Truth Movement is all about, but they will be PISSED OFF...first at themselves for being dummies...and then at the Pentagon because they are bright enough to see that the five sided "warprison" as being their abusers. Man-o-man...are they gonna be pissed when dawn breaks upon Marblehead...

[that's a really BAD Massachsett's pun that has to do with the sun coming up on Marblehead, MA very early in the USofA's day...]

BTW...from my view, there is little doubt that the leadership of the Peace Movements are FULLY aware of false-flag-ops and have been dilligent at NOT making them well known to their followship. [Israel is WELL KNOWN to use "false-flag-ops" as a staple of their militaristic conduct...DOT-DOT-DOT-DOT]...

If awareness about "false-flag-ops" had actually happened, then their "followship" would have developed their OWN critical thinking skills...and consequently, would have discovered that they should NOT be following the compromised Peace Movement Leaderships.

And of course, leaders can't have independent thinkers amongst them...until the 9/11 Truth Movement of course...

So, that Chertoff is yapping it all up that citizens should IGNORE " false-flag-ops" is a dead give away that they are trying as best they can to salvage the remaining hypnotized citizenry who actually STILL BELIEVE these killer thugs...

[Isn't Chertoff yet another Israeli-American holding dual citizenship...I thought that I'd heard that somewhere?]

So gang, lets keep doing the "Indiana Jones" thing here...lets seek the Holy Grail...

...its the FALSE-FLAG-OPS Baby...

Even if we don't score this gig...wer'e gonna have a blast annoying these F_ _ _S...

I am having a gas anyway...the local WA State gestapo cannot even look my way anymore when I'm in the streets because I have made them actually READ their manuals regarding the rights of free speech...and how they HAVE to defend every citizen's rights to express their opinions...including MINE...an opinion that threatens their groins.

The police state intimidation of the CI based 9/11 Truth for Peace Movement has all but left the Puget Sound...and now they have to protect...ME while complaining about them...or exposing their big five sided Daddy anyway!!!

Chertoff is trying to make this momentum change by executing a "fase-flag-op" on "false-flag-ops"...

But of course, the 9/11 truthers step up and bag and expose yet another corrupted liar...

But...HMMM...Chertoff may be setting us up for another REAL ATTACK...never know with these killer thugs...just ask Georgian and Russian peoples who were unknowing pawns in the McCain presidential bid...

These killers just do not care...

Love, Peace and Progress...

Robin Hordon

Similar answer for FEMA Camps

One of the guys from WeAreChangeLondon asked him a question about FEMA camps recently. "Imaginary" he said

www.wearechange.org.uk
www.9-11.meetup.com/420

Got that on camera?

Would love to see the video from the UK Change v. Chertoff confrontation.

WWW.PHILLY911TRUTH.ORG

"There is no fury like that of a man scorned for expressing truth!"

Great Question from Nick the Sociology Major

crappy deflection by Chertoff, who himself needs to be investigated in connection with 9/11
http://www.historycommons.org/entity.jsp?entity=michael_chertoff

for the record, from the transcript- thanks for the public property, DHS; you're serving the public interest by having this on your site:

Question: Nick, sociology major.

On the issue of internal security, in the wake of the 2001 anthrax attacks which were initially pinned on al-Qaeda, until a few months afterwards it became evident that it was not an al-Qaeda attack but rather some sort of internal security breach because the particular strain of anthrax that was used was one of 118 strains, one of which that came out of Fort Detrick, Maryland, the Department of Defense program in the 1980s, Project Jefferson had developed, it was essentially a derivation of a military grade weapon, and then they tried to put it on to Steven Hatfield, one of the engineers or the technicians out at the department but he was later exonerated and he won a $5 million settlement. Then more recently we had Bruce Ivins, who was pinned as the perpetrator and he conveniently committed suicide, the real issue here -- the real issue is he wouldn’t have been able to create this weaponized grade of an anthrax because he needed a static charge and a machine with infrared capabilities that was well outside of his purview.

So this really looks to be to be furthermore an inside job, but the question is who particularly is involved, and we know from 1962 and Operation Northwoods that criminal elements in the U.S. Government have planned and staged terrorist attacks as a way of justifying political agendas and furthering whatever aims they have.

So the question is -- the question is what -- what has the Department of Homeland Security done to further investigate this issue?

Secretary Chertoff: Well, first let me say that it is incorrect to say that -- I don’t know that anybody seriously thought that al-Qaeda might have been responsible. I don’t think anybody officially ever asserted that.

The FBI has done a very comprehensive review of this. Now that’s -- you know, the risk that the government, based on a 1962 program, launched an anthrax attack, it was put in the basic non-existent risk category and that’s actually a great example -- if that’s the kind of risk we worry about, then we’re moving away from the real risks into the realm of imaginary risks because that’s not the risks.

Dr. Robertson: We have time for one more question.

http://911reports.com
http://arabesque911.blogspot.com/2008/08/911-activists-start-your-own-91...

Chertoff said Katrina threat didn't exist, too

"Chertoff: Katrina scenario did not exist

However, experts for years had warned of threat to New Orleans

Monday, September 5, 2005; Posted: 2:55 p.m. EDT (18:55 GMT)

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Defending the U.S. government's response to Hurricane Katrina, Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff argued Saturday that government planners did not predict such a disaster ever could occur.

But in fact, government officials, scientists and journalists have warned of such a scenario for years.

Chertoff, fielding questions from reporters, said government officials did not expect both a powerful hurricane and a breach of levees that would flood the city of New Orleans. (See the video on a local paper's prophetic warning -- 3:30 )

"That 'perfect storm' of a combination of catastrophes exceeded the foresight of the planners, and maybe anybody's foresight," Chertoff said.

He called the disaster "breathtaking in its surprise."

But engineers say the levees preventing this below-sea-level city from being turned into a swamp were built to withstand only Category 3 hurricanes. And officials have warned for years that a Category 4 could cause the levees to fail. (See video of why the levee's breech was devastating -- 1:53)

Katrina was a Category 4 hurricane when it struck the Gulf Coast on August 29.

Last week, Michael Brown, head of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, told CNN his agency had recently planned for a Category 5 hurricane hitting New Orleans.

Speaking to "Larry King Live" on August 31, in the wake of Katrina, Brown said, "That Category 4 hurricane caused the same kind of damage that we anticipated. So we planned for it two years ago. Last year, we exercised it. And unfortunately this year, we're implementing it."..."

http://www.cnn.com/2005/US/09/03/katrina.chertoff/index.html

Translation....

....of Chertoff's answer about anthrax being an inside job:

"Don't waste your time looking inside the govt. for the anthrax culprit because the agencies are better than ever at keeping it covered up. Why don't you be smart like the rest of the sheep in this room and go along with the myths we keep spreading in forums like this one?"

That was a very well researched, coherent question you guys asked and Chertoff obviously didn't want to deal with history, the truth, and the legitimate connection you were making. Anyone with a brain in that room saw that he was skirting the issue and dismissing it as bunk. The mindset of the military revealed in strategies like Operation Northwoods needs to be continually hammered home. I recommend that wherever the Northwoods story is told, we also have on hand photocopies of the Joint Chiefs statement to hand out to audiences after presentations like this one. I think most people will be shocked.

Great job!

He Got The Memo!

You know why he dropped that little tid bit of info. The US Special Forces Counterinsurgency manual was leaked to wikileaks back in June and someone must have dropped a memo on his desk. The memo must have been something like.."hey someone figured out were pullin' this shit on the public. Let 'em know in the press conference we a'int."

http://wikileaks.org/wiki/US_Special_Forces_counter-insurgency_manual_FM...

And lo and behold it has "The manual directly advocates training paramilitaries, pervasive surveillance, censorship, press control and restrictions on labor unions & political parties. It directly advocates warrantless searches, detainment without charge and (under varying circumstances) the suspension of habeas corpus. It directly advocates employing terrorists or prosecuting individuals for terrorism who are not terrorists, running false flag operations and concealing human rights abuses from journalists. And it repeatedly advocates the use of subterfuge and “psychological operations” (propaganda) to make these and other “population & resource control” measures more palatable."

"I would imagine that if you took the top expert in that type of work and gave him the assignment of bringing these buildings down with explosives, I would bet that he could do it." -1993-John Skilling, Head Structural Engineer WTC Towers