Change.org accepts idea about 9/11 censorship
Freedom of speech is a very powerful weapon, but even those who say to support it are sometimes frightened by it. Change.org makes no difference, as we all know that while asking people to submit ideas, the really revoultionary ones (like the idea we need a really indipendent investigation into 9/11) are censored by them.
What is bad is that you only get a "copy and paste" e-mail informing you that "...this is unfortunately outside the scope of the Ideas for Change in America project, which aims to offer specific policy solutions rather than investigations into past government action. As such, it is not eligible to enter the second round of the competition."
What is worst it that it's false, as you can see with idea "Appoint a Special Prosecutor for the Crimes of the Bush Administration" (804 votes)
Well, no need to be rough on scared people, I politely replied to their e-mail:
"You seem to answer a question I didn't pose: my proposal is to end censorship, not to support a new investigation.
As such I will present it again, let's hope you are not on the side of censorship while posting a banner that calls for direct action and direct democracy."
So here it is:
End censorship on "new 9/11 investigation" debate
Enforce first amendment to stop the unlawful and unpatriotic censorship regarding the debate on the necessity of a second investigation on the terrorist acts on 9/11/2001.
Publish a permanent list of newspapers, television networks and websites that support censorship on the issue.
http://www.change.org/ideas/view/end_censorship_on_new_911_investigation_debate
- Sertes's blog
- Login to post comments
Support Sertes and
This is # 8 - 819 votes
Appoint a special prosecutor for the crimes of the Bush administration
http://www.change.org/ideas/view/appoint_a_special_prosecutor_for_the_cr....
Let's keep it on the front page.
This needs to go viral. Both the truth movement and the peace movement can support the call to hold Bush and Cheney accountable. In the comments we should never mention 9/11, that will get it deleted. Stick to Abu Graib, wiretapping and other things that a majority of Americans agree on. If we all pull in the same direction, we can get this in the top 5.
Think about it. We are trying to open Pandora's box. Best to open it a little at first. Getting a special prosecutor appointed is the first step toward 9/11 truth.
I used to be a road manager. When I came up against a brick wall, like a security guard with a power complex, I just found a way to go around him.
This is our way around the Change.not gatekeepers.
Can you spell "setup"
I just got an email from Democrats.com
They are pushing the idea of having Fitzgerald appointed special prosecutor. Now I get it. Change.not deleted everything related to 9/11 because the didn't want to look back or some such nonsense. Now this one suddenly appears in the top 10 asking for Fitzgerald to be the special prosecutor. Fitzgerald took 2 years or more investigating Libby and we heard nothing until after the election. We are being set up for another sham investigation but we can turn it around by demanding that Vincent Bugliosi be the one. Will you post a comment to that effect and get others to do the same? [I have been banned for protesting the deletion of the #1 9/11 thread.]
Bugliosi has already investigated and has a rock solid case for murder. He is 105 out of 106 in convictions. The man knows his stuff.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/vincent-bugliosi/the-prosecution-of-george...
You mean Vincent Bugliosi?
JFK Assassination: Doubting The Doubters
http://abcnews.go.com/Video/playerIndex?id=3174309
--
"But truthfully, I don't really know. We've had trouble getting a handle on Building No. 7."
~Dr. Shyam Sunder - Acting Dir. Bldg. & Fire Research Lab. (NIST)
"We are [still] unable to provide a full explanation of the total collapse." (NIST)
Still better than Fitzgerald
He seems to believe the 911 OCT from what i have read.
A Fitzgerald 'investigation' would drag on for years and, of course, they wouldn't be able to release any information.
Bugliosi would aggressively prosecute and all the incriminating evidence is in his book so the public would become acutely aware of the particulars. He could file an indictment immediately.
In any case, an investigation or indictment would be a major shift and the invincibility of the neo-cons will be shaken. More people would be open to 911 truth.
The fact that they are doing this shows that we are having an effect. It's a complete reversal of their stated reason for deleting Debora Blake's idea.