David Ray Griffin's Response to UN Watch's Article: “NGO Says Richard Falk Has “Zero Credibility,” Urges UN Chief to Fire Him”

Yes, Richard Falk’s comments are “preposterous” – except for the enormous amount of evidence supporting those comments. It is unfortunate that the Secretary-General chose simply to “condemn” Falk’s comments instead of using the UN’s resources to investigate the relevant evidence. Surely such an investigation is justified by the fact that the official account of 9/11 has been rejected by more than a dozen professional organizations, including Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth (with over 1,400 professional members), Scientists for 9/11 Truth, Firefighters for 9/11 Truth, Lawyers for 9/11 Truth, Medical Professionals for 9/11 Truth, Pilots for 9/11 Truth, Political Leaders for 9/11 Truth, Military Officers for 9/11 Truth, and Intelligence Officers for 9/11 Truth. Given the fact that the official account of 9/11 is now rejected by virtually all professionals who are independent (of the US government) and have studied the evidence, it is this official account that is “preposterous,” not Mr. Falk’s comments.

David Ray Griffin
January 26, 2011

Excellent reply . . .

. . . clear, concise, accurate and authoritative. Wonderful to see DRG back on the scene!

Yes, but . . .

We can only hope no one looks too closely at the 'professional' claims advocated by the Pilots group. Almost every post on their front page amounts to commercial jets not being involved in the attacks -- either they were swapped, flew away from the scene undetected, or were not present at all.

And the Intelligence Officers website appears to no longer exist - http://io911truth.com/home


No sinister censorship here - I deleted it myself after realizing I had misread an earlier comment and had made an inappropriate response.

But since I am here, let me just say I support Victoria's comment about Pilots for 9/11 Truth. Their assertion that the g-force would be too great to enable the plane to pull up safely from the final descent is easily shown to be wrong, yet they do not retract it. This assertion gives powerful support to CIT and thus seriously damages the effectiveness of the 9/11 movement in reaching the public. How can we expect the public to listen to our descriptions of the demolition of the towers if we talk obvious rubbish about the Pentagon?

Intelligence Officers for 911 Truth Website

Vitronix, the site you (rightly) give for Intelligence Officers for 9/11 Truth says: "The site is currently not available due to technical problems."

Why would you take this to mean that "the Intelligence Officers website appears to no longer exist"?



It's been that way for awhile now, not just today or yesterday.


Do you agree with this part of Dr. Griffin's statement?

DRG - "Given the fact that the official account of 9/11 is now rejected by virtually all professionals who are independent (of the US government) and have studied the evidence"

Do I agree with this part of Dr. Griffin's statement?

Yes, I do believe it, or I would not have posted his comment.

Note that Dr. Griffin qualifies his statement by referring to "independent" professionals who "have studied the evidence".

Certainly there are more published statements from such people than there are from independent professionals who have studied the evidence and who argue in support of the official account.


thank you for your response.

tides of man

These are pivotal moments. Connections are being made. Tunisian revolution[ex-president skips with 1.5 ton of gold.], Mubarak's desperate hold on power further illuminating the depth of corruption understood as consensual cost of alliance with western deep state politik.[they will screw each other]
A deep state politik revolving around - relying upon - suppression of the false flag 911 atrocity .
These moments are part of a global awareness, by which Mister Falk's call to investigate 911 conspiracy represent a tide that began turning some time ago. Now coming into view. A tide built into a tsunami, speeding toward the beach Bush and 'rummy' play Tony and Lucky Larry on, as more conscious people 'in high places' begin to openly contend with the QUESTIONS all professional groups involved in 911 activism are asking.

Each that stands and weighs in, adds to the measure.

Poweful Statement of TRUTH Remo!