The Air Defense on 9/11: Anomalies and Questions Published on Nov 7, 2012 by GlobalResearchTV

The Air Defense on 9/11: Anomalies and Questions

Published on Nov 7, 2012 by GlobalResearchTV

The systematic failure of every level of the US air defense on the morning of September 11th provides one of the clearest "smoking guns" in the full complicity of key elements of the US government and defense department in those attacks. In his new peer-reviewed article published at the Journal of 9/11 Studies, author and researcher Paul Schreyer outlines many of these key anomalies and the way they have been carefully covered up by the so-called 9/11 investigations. This is the GRTV Feature Interview with your host James Corbett and our special guest, Paul Schreyer.

Thank you

Thanks to James Corbett and Paul Schreyer for sharing this discussion on a most important topic.

And thanks to Joe for posting it.

I'll add one more to the

I'll add one more to the communication break downs. The only reason why the report at 9:21 that AA11 was still in the air & heading towards Washington DC (a report that resulted in the Langley jets being sent in the OPPOSITE direction [NE] at the very time AA77 was approaching DC from the SW) was believable was because American airlines had not yet confirmed that it was their aircraft (11) that had struck the North Tower at 8:46. Why were they Not able to confirm this? Because American Airlines was LOCKED out of their own computer! This can be heard on the NORAD tapes (channel 2).


Any thoughts on who might have had the capacity to lock American Airlines out of their own computer?

Some words

pop into mind. Promis, inslaw, mosad, isi, fbi, dia, nsa, mi5&6, pnac, etc., etc., not to mention cia.

Great sluthing

I see things more simplistically

1. The WTC was blown up and congress & the press was anthraxed with military anthrax. The preponderance of evidence confirms FALSE FLAG TERROR!

2. Logic says the pentagon was part of the false flag, and since it was hit in the accounting offices, there were probably explosives involved.

3. How about a FOIA for or maybe a whistle blower has some dust?