On edit: Sorry posted this on the wrong thread. Meant to post on the ReThink911 thread.

Dear ReThink911 Supporters,

In just 36 hours we have raised over $15,000 of the $25,000 needed to keep our massive 54-foot-tall billboard in Times Square for yet another month! Thank you so much to everyone who has helped to make this fundraising drive a phenomenal success thus far.

With the rest of today to go, we are confident that we will reach our goal and continue onwards in educating millions of people – but we can only do it with your help.

Donate what you can today – it is critical that we reach our goal by the end of the day – and let’s work together in the month of October to ensure that the news media continues to cover our story. Just the other day the Dallas Observer wrote a story – biased, but with enough detail to intrigue intelligent readers – thanks to the combination of our powerful advertising and targeted media outreach. In the month of October we’re aiming for the Daily News, the New York Post, the Village Voice and more! Stay tuned for a detailed action plan that involves you. But today, we must reach $25,000 so that the billboard stays for another month.

Thanks. The video will be great to link to when emailing and when commenting on articles published online.

It will go perfectly with such as this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rNR6Kbg5jJ8
and this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YQI6gOw9y-c

We actually put this information re stiffeners and the drawings out there in February of 2012, shortly after finding it. I honestly feel as if we have done the work here that serves NIST up on a plate for those within this movement who should have been all over this right from the word go. I applaud and actively support campaigns like rethink911, that encourage people to "H E L P Us Get The Truth About BUILDING 7 NOW" as it is important to raise awareness among people, but the truth about building 7 is that we have the truth right here, in a form that is presentable at primary evidence grade level in a court. Inevitably the question has to be asked, "where do we take this next?"
It is frustrating that the only group that seems to have a real interest in actually getting this into a court is a small independent group of researchers, whose time would be better spent breaking more new ground in terms of the engineering gaps in NISTs story, which we continue to do. I think this indicates a gap in our movement, and one that needs to be filled, but until it is we will be doing our best to move this issue from engineering to legality. To this end, we will be producing a presentation in the next few weeks that will set out the case against NIST and how we intend to pursue it. This video is just a brief introduction to the issue and does not really get into the detail which really would corner NIST.