Support 911Blogger


Interview 822 – Richard Gage Takes ReThink 9/11 Across Canada

Interview 822 – Richard Gage Takes ReThink 9/11 Across Canada

Posted by Corbett

Podcast: http://www.corbettreport.com/mp3/2014-02-10%20Richard%20Gage.mp3

Richard Gage, AIA, founder of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth joins us today to talk about the ReThink 9/11 campaign that is seeking to refocus the public’s attention on the crimes of September 11, 2001 and their cover up. As part of the ongoing campaign, ReThink911.ca is putting on a cross-Canada tour of speaking engagements featuring Richard Gage’s keynote presentation, “9/11: Blueprint for Truth.” Today we talk to Gage about the tour and its importance to Canada and the world.

Extremely Important

Let's hope that enough Canadians care enough to force a new independent scientific investigation. Thank you, Richard for your tireless work for truth and justice.

Justice...

It's unlikely to go anywhere in terms of a new investigation in Canada, but everything helps to move history in a better direction.

I'm hoping for some good press coverage at the very least.

As to a new criminal investigation - the best bet will be the International Criminal Court in Europe for which support has been mounting over the last few years.

There's a high level judge in Italy with Lawyers for 9/11 Truth, Judge Imposimato, who's ready to move it forward. Perhaps he could lead that charge..?

http://lawyersfor911truth.blogspot.ca/

The evidence really needs to be presented in an independant (from the US Judicial System which has been corrupted in regards to this issue) court, somewhere, or in front of a Grand Jury, somewhere, even if only for symbolic reasons and to help forward the movement of the truth and the cause of truth and justice.

There are indictable offenses, including willful criminal negligence causing death, just in terms of the decisions and actions of the major players while the events unfolded.

There was also the authorization of torture during the ensuing "war on terror".

Why this hasn't come up in the International Criminal Court is astounding in and of itself.

If we can't get this into a Court of law fairly soon, like within the next year or two, it will become like the JFK assassination with interminable and endless speculation, nothing more with any real "justice" remaining only in the hands of God alone, but that's not good enough in terms of what we need here in the earthly realm so that policy and historical formation can be appropriately impacted by the revelation of the truth with the beast in the system responsible wrapped up in chains and deep-sixed to the sound of cheers both on earth and in heaven above.

Taking the 9/11 Evidence into a Court of Law...

Something tells me that we as a movement should focus on making Italy the epicenter of the drive to get the 9/11 false flag evidence into an International Criminal Court proceeding.

It's the place where the documentary "September 11 - The New Pearl Harbor" by award winning filmmaker Massimo Maccuzzo, was launched

http://www.luogocomune.net/site/modules/sections/index.php?op=viewarticle&artid=167

It's where we have this Judge Imposimato, and i have the distinct impression that the new Pope Francis at the Vatican in Rome isn't so friendly to the Obama Administration and American imperialism and he surely curries some favor in Italy - plus the country is shaped like a boot! (jk)

Just a thought...

Edit to add: The Court.

The International Criminal Court (ICC or ICCt)[2] is a permanent international tribunal to prosecute individuals for genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes, and the crime of aggression (although jurisdiction for the crime of aggression[3] will not be awakened until 2017 at the earliest).[4][5]

The ICC was created by the Rome Statute which came into force on 1 July 2002.[6][7] The Court has established itself in The Hague, Netherlands, but its proceedings may take place anywhere.[8] It is intended to complement existing national judicial systems, and may only exercise its jurisdiction when national courts are unwilling or unable to investigate or prosecute such crimes.

Currently, 122 states[9] are states parties to the Statute of the Court, including all of South America, nearly all of Europe, most of Oceania and roughly half the countries in Africa.[10] A further 31 countries,[9] including Russia, have signed but not ratified the Rome Statute.[10] The law of treaties obliges these states to refrain from “acts which would defeat the object and purpose” of the treaty until they declare they do not intend to become a party to the treaty.[11] Three of these states—Israel, Sudan and the United States—have informed the UN Secretary General that they no longer intend to become states parties and, as such, have no legal obligations arising from their former representatives' signature of the Statute.[10][12] 41 United Nations member states[9] have neither signed nor ratified or acceded to the Rome Statute..

International Criminal Court
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Criminal_Court

Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rome_Statute

Need to research this a little more - but it looks like it could be done.

As for the individuals to be indicted and tried (even in absentia), i would suggest starting with just three, George W. Bush, Richard Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld, both for authorizing the use of torture, as well as in relation to the 9/11 event, based solely on their conscious choices and actions as the events unfolded ie: for willful criminal negligence causing death. By proving something that i think is called "aforeknowledge" or conscious awareness of what was taking place outside the domain of their chain of authority, to the degree that they did what they did or didn't do what they didn't do, by choice, with full awareness of the role they were to play during the crucial hour and a half or until it was all done - this would open up the possibility for a subsequent investigative inquiry into the events and phenomenon of 9/11 in a broader context, while retaining the authority to indict others maybe starting with "the other 19", or say the top 10 suspects to begin with.

Italy - Rome, the Roman Statute - wouldn't that be ironic and appropriate?

France isn't considered to be strong enough in terms of authority - but Rome, under the Roman Statute most certainly would, and does.

Beyond my day job, pursuing this kind of thing even if only by recruiting and rallying the right people could represent a worthy pursuit.

It's not impossible.

And that Roman Statute is just waiting in the wings to be applied and it needs SOMETHING to retain it's validity - in the name of PEACE.

Think it through - it makes sense..

Rome. And the fall of the bad Rome, the evil empire and evil state, placed on trial. .Woah

What a totally awesome thing that would be - i think it's the real purpose of the 9/11 truth movement, beginning with the end in mind, not for the sake of any kind of vengeance, but for Justice including historical justice and a re-setting of the record straight in regards to the fundamental historicity of the event, because obviously the official story is in the process of imploding globally, as well over 1/2 the world's population wrestle with the process of a viable alternative hypothesis and that's the problem with the "conspiracy" how it counted on that outcome, whereby the OS narrative would form the only narrative, as per a type of hijacking of Occam's Razor.

We've GOT to get this into the ICC, not in the Netherlands, since it can take place in any of the participating nation states, including Rome itself in Italy, while also putting the new Pope to the test, and i have the feeling that he doesn't support their shenanigans, so we'd have the Vatican on our side as well even if only in silent complicity or secretly and covertly in support and rooting it on - a favorable environment in other words - to finally and at last put 9/11 and the perps on trial.

I'm starting to think that it might be possible...

Anything is possible, and, given enough time, inevitable because there's nothing more powerful than an idea whose time has come.

Already started

dropped it into Victoria and Canada to start with - best to start slow and not flood reddit, which will look bad and turn people off. It's not been well received so far.

However, an Reddit AMA with Richard Gage of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, in r/conspiracy (where there's support for this issue) would be the way to go. It would hit the front page.

Please look into how this is done, but again it's best launched from r/conspiracy where people are sympathetic to the cause and in numbers capable of upvoting it to teh front page.

Just my two cents for whatever it's worth.

Thanks for posting that - very helpful.

Totally agree...

I agree with you. Good perspective. Here's the moderator at /r/conspiracy who set up the most recent AMA that I've seen:

http://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=axolotl_peyotl

Go ahead

Please coordinate.

Another friendly mod there is SovereignMan - but you'll also need to coordinate with Richard Gage and Rethink911.ca

If we wait (to do the AMA) until the tour starts rolling, with some press coverage, it could be set up to coincide with Richard's arrival in Ottawa.

This will shine a spotlight, and then bifurcate through the reddit-sphere - a campaign should be set up for this on Facebook and Twitter also.

Critical mass on the Net is essential these days for any type of campaign like this.

And for the AMA, r/conspiracy would be prepared to run a FREE add on their subreddit like they did for "September 11 - The New Pearl Harbor".

What we need also for more links, will be press coverage by local Canadian Newspapers, who ought to be alerted and invited to attend and report from each event, at each city - because it's news, it's noteworthy.