Robert Alexander's story needs to be put on the back burner until ALL his statements are verified and triangulated with documented factual evidence. Otherwise it may very well ruin the reputation of the Lawyers' Committee for 9/11 Inquiry. Anyone can have a statement specially notarized. This does not qualify for proof of each statement, not for our legal needs. The LC is in a very precarious position and must maintain perfect legitimacy.

I am surprised the LC is allowing the Alexander story to be discussed by board members to the public and sensationalized like it has been UNTIL the story is believed by the LC Board and it is voted upon to back it. For when a member of the LC puts it out there, that IS an endorsement no matter if the person gives a caveat they are speaking for themselves. We can not take any chances now. Being a LC Board member must take priority over sensationalizing stories before they are proven beyond a shadow of a doubt to be true. His story may very well be true, and he should buy himself a polygraph test, do the FOIA requests for airport documents to prove he was there. There ARE video recordings, and there will be records of a person being slashed up with a knife in their restroom for sure. He was given first aid at the airport, surely those documents exist. HE should have by now provided all the proof needed, in fact before he ever wrote to the LC he should have done this. Totally.

Now that the LC has a website and it making headway all kinds of stories will come out of the woodwork. The closer to success with proving the Truth, the more 'stories' will come forward. You can damn well count on #1: The bad guys are going to do anything in their very strong evil power to stop justice, #2. Many good people with real stories may write in,but the LC can not take time away to track down each lead, not until they get a real brick and mortar building with volunteers and interns helping.
The person with the story must verify it with #1. A polygraph test from a licensed facility #2. Well documented proof of their claims, names, exact dates, addresses, etc. #3. Notarized statement. Something along those lines.

WTF has Robert got to do with the lawyers committee for 9/11 not a lot just guy they helped out ..And for starters they were the first to listen to the story Jane Clark in particular ! She was instrumental in pointing Barbara Honegger in my direction GOD BLESS her for that ! I haven’t ask for anything other then telling the story in a Federal Court of Law. In 2015 after keeping silent for 14 years.. I finally broke down shared this story with FBI agent Chris Hendrickson in my home after dinner. Chris told his boss and I was invited to put this down on paper at the San Diego Bureau of FBI . I showed up February 2016 and did just that ! At end of interview FBI agent tried to intimidating for me .. threatened me with Arrest ! She said making false statements to a federal officer my immediate response was for her to do it ! I told her in my defense.. I’ll ask for TWO things in Discovery ! 1st Airport Video Surveillance Tapes of Harrisburg International Airport of Me August 25,26,2001 ! 2nd Would be The “Recorded Conversation” Made To San Diego Bureau of the FBI Prior to 9/11 in August of 2001 . I made a lot of mistakes but I never lied in August and September of 2001 ! US Government can’t say the same thing ! Also took it a step farther to prove my point and Spent Two Day’s Writing Up My Sworn Jurat Affidavit and had it Notarized ! Under Penalty of Perjury any Federal Court proceeding, Congressional Inquiry or Bona fide Grand Jury ! I don’t discount anybody’s opinions are hypothesis on 9/11. Because at this point wouldn’t put anything past the federal government. As to what was done to the WTC and building number 7 . So before you pass judgment I will ask that you at least take the time and effort to read My Sworn Jurat Affidavit and ask yourself simple question why would I Lie ? Yeah any questions feel free to ask I’ll do my best to off come back and reply ..