publicizing the five Truthers in the world who are also Holocaust deniers.

If people have their doubts it is their right to express them. Calling doubts denial is manipulative use of language. People who do this are not examples of truthfulness but manipulators. Why don't they come up with undeniable forensic proof for the "deniers" instead. It never happens!
In many european and some other countries people can be sent to prison for doubting the H.
Does this make sense? Truth should be in the open for everyone to see, lies only need protection.
Why was the WTC buildings' steel removed ? Because it showed collapse?
Why were the oral histories from 911 locked away? Because they proove the official story?
Why haven 't we seen any Pentagon video of a Boeing hitting it? Because all these video's show a Boeing hitting the Pentagon?
Why have you never heard of the Leuchter report? A scientific report which later was corroborated by chemist Germar Rudolf which you also have never heard of? Because it prooves aspects of the H.? Go find out.

I'm sorry for getting off topic but I didn't start, I applaude Williams efforts for he also goes for facts and this new video is another great piece of evidence though I have to add that forensic evidence is as or even more important - the forensics weren 't destroyed so thoroughly if they weren't so important- but Steven Jones en others luckily have managed to get that going also.

That crap has zero credibility:

http://veritas3.holocaust-history.org/auschwitz/chemistry/

Take your denial somewhere else. No, we're not talking about "doubts," as you say; we are talking about facts, and they don't support the fallacious claims of Fred Leuchter.

Interesting that you pulled that out of nowhere, accusing me of never having "heard" of it. I never mentioned it, because it was not germane to ANYTHING at this blog. More important, the promotion of junk science in general does not assist 9/11 Truth.

Your tone is quite offensive so I don 't bother trying to educate you any more.
And I was not accusing you for not having heard of it. That makes no sense.
I pointed out that you (or people in general actually) would have never heard of it because
it is suppressed information and not trumpeted by Fox news. Hidden like the steel of the WTC, the oral histories etc. Read what it says please.

The article you link to contains many contradictions but also some nice truths like:
"It is easier to tell a lie than to prove a lie to be incorrect"
Well I couldn't agree more, it 's a lot of work to make a chemical analysis, claiming that it sucks is simple, prooving deniers that it's correct is again much work, etc.

im just wondering, but what 5 would that be in your opinion? not trying to open a can of worms here, im genuinely interested in knowing. obviously Hufschmid is one, but i think most do a pretty good job of either not using his work at all or seperating his first book and video(both of which are mainly about the destruction of the towers and nothing else. both of which are/were considered great resources by most in the 9/11 community) from his later rantings. if the SLC guys cant or wont do that i think that says a lot about them. im not shaping my message or activism to please or appease SLC or other debunkers. they really dont matter as much as some people think.

"The Central Intelligence Agency owns everyone of any significance in the major media." ~ William Colby, Former Director, CIA

"Five" just represents the exceedingly small number of Truthers who support Holocaust denial. Hufschmid is obviously one. Morgan Stack comes to mind (I don't recall if he denies the Holocaust, but he is on record making obviously anti-semitic comments). Again, I was being figurative. If you visit Screw Loose Change on any given week, you will see at least one story about 9/11 Truth being associated with Holocaust denial. I consider it instructive to look at the debunker sites occasionally, to see what they think are the most damaging attacks against 9/11 Truth. Holocaust denial is their favorite attack.

Ultimately, the issue of the Holocaust is entirely irrelevant to 9/11 Truth. Either 9/11 was in some sense an inside job, or it was not. End of story. Discussion of tangential issues is a distraction, or, at worst, disinformation.

Irrelevant? So you are denying that 911 and the H. both are zionist jobs?
And you like to see deniers wear denier badges, throw them into denier-camps, have a denier-H., subsequent some denier-H.-survivers? Oh yeah and then come the denier-H.-deniers!
Oh my god this is getting complicated!

but what would that say about the SLC crew if they have to resort to that? guilt by association? im not exactly too afraid if thats the best they can do. if holocaust denial is their favorite attack they must be worse off for material than i thought.

"The Central Intelligence Agency owns everyone of any significance in the major media." ~ William Colby, Former Director, CIA

AFAIK, Stack just reposted a very stupid and Jew-hating article by Eric May on his site. He should remove it and explain why it was there in the first place and whether he agrees with its premises about Jews -- BUT to go from that to calling him an exceedingly inflammatory name when you acknowledge that you "can't recall if he denies the Holocaust" seems very imprudent.

Everyone posting articles blaming jews should be considered a zionist (shill).
It might frighten some jews, others might get defensive but the
result is that it enlarges the group identity and makes the distance
to non-jewish groups greater which zionists regard as a desired outcome.
After all, they want "attract" jews to move to their country.