No way was it wired for explosives when it was built.

If so, why didn't they topple the towers in 1993? It would have been perfect, and the agenda would have been moved ahead by 8 years.

This is how cd will eventually be explained if we get a smoking gun. After the '93 op they decided to wire the buildings to prevent them from "toppling" if another attack ever tool place. In other words, it was to save lives. They will further explain that they only demolished the first tower when it appeared inevitable that it was going to topple, killing thousands, perhaps tens of thousands; therefore, it was a touch decision but had to made. It was felt that the publc would not understand the touch decision that had to made, therefore the pancake theory was adopted.

Also, Flight 93 was shot down to prevent the dastardly Al-Qaeda types from reaching the whitehouse. Touch decision, but it was the right thing to do.

Sorry, sloppy typing. "Tough decision".

Anyone else think they might be able to get away with that theory?

Could there be some truth to this idea? We all know they were trying to minimize loss of life in order to justify the atrocious action to themselves. Did they decide to wire the buildings to prevent a complete blood bath and the massive destruction of surrounding areas? not, as commonly suggested, to make the event more shocking? Were they concerned that the top of the buildings might actually topple over? Just an idea. Perphaps someone smarter than me can set the record straight.

This is something that I have thought about a fair deal. Truth has a way of taking us by surprise. I wonder whether there is some key 'missing link' to the story that will become clear. either through a whistleblower stepping forward or through a deliberate leak.

It might be seen as a clever way of leapfrogging the truth movement, to construct a form of ' lesser of two evils' scenario whereby controlled demolition was seen as a wise decision in the light of the instability of the towers and the risk of them toppling.

Who knows?

( I am hiding my identity as this is highly sensitive speculation and the perps may not want us to second-guess them - hence Anonymous)

Anonymous; I share no such fear, but you should do as you wish.

If you want to speculate in this fashion I would remind, that many have done so in the past and what you ultimately end up with are narratives that SOUND like complete science fiction and Dr. Strangeloves' who attempt to 'saving the world' through completely misguided overlords.

Although my inductive reasoning may completely concur with such analysis and speculation, deductive reasons/reasoning and convincing proof are sorely lacking among the general public. If you can peg it perfectly, and momentarily spook the overlord with your mental prowess, he/she has nothing to worry about.... "it's simply too unbelievable."

If you want to devise a counter, to whatever moves that Dr. Overlord wants to try next....

Watch TV purely for entertainment and for killing a bit of time. Never think of as a reputable source to learn anything from, and darn sure never tell anyone "because I saw it last night on the News".

Insulate yourself from all forms of economy which are capable of exerting undue-influence back upon you. Study adhesion principal (acknowledging the complete 'justness' of a thing and your submission to it, by handling it without denunciation of its repugnant aspects).

Do not accept promises of security in exchange for liberty.

Learn what just and genuine defense and collective defensive agreements MUST be based upon.

Learn the nature of weapons and how your enemy uses them. The ancient martial arts phylosophies we enjoy for entertainment, are based on this very principal.

Encourage liberal-earth-lovers, to reconsider the purpose and proper function in society of the second amendment. Just defense, and keeping collective governance in-check always boils down to a person to person duel... An aggressor vs. a defender... and these mindsets are traded back and forth, at break-neck speed. But the "gun" and it usefulness in justifiable defense, is not going to be dropped by the human animal anytime soon. Stop pretending that it will.

Certainly mind your words in polite conversation (as Rep asked me to reconsider my constant swearing like a sailor)..... but never allow your thoughts and concepts to be intimidated by charges of anti-patriotism or disloyalty.... especially in matters of life and death.

Overlords and Controllers can only prevail in an illusion.... and they rely upon The People to play along. Call them what they are.... delusional.

Just a few thoughts.... I can't give a poop whom it may be that hears or reads it. With any luck... it will be We The People.

s

"The truth shall make you free." Why not make the truth free? We live on a priceless blue pearl, awash in a universe of fire and ice. Cut the crap.

That's what I honestly believed for like a year and a half. That day on 9/11, I felt Flt 93 was a very apparant lie and that the towers came down from demolition. I thought that it was wired up after 93 secretly to make sure they never toppled over sideways. It wasn't until I saw the pentagon stuff and read PNAC that it all came together.

you are absolutely right, ive said that myself all along. that when the case for CD becomes too hard to ignore, we will hear about how the towers already had explosives in them for "safety reasons".

There's no way out of this for the fascists except nukes and death camps. Spread a lot of truth today.

the reason not in 93 is because there was a different party in control and it was not the agenda. however, I can't believe that explosives could be approved by the building inspectors.

I don't recall that the caller mentioned explosives. I think she said that according to the documentary, the WTC was designed to be easily taken apart.

Thom's shows are archived, so this can be verified. The date was Monday, August 21 2006.

I must have missed the reference to explosives during the show. Here are the caller's words:

"Sometime before 9/11 there was a PBS special on the building of the twin towers, and in the middle of it they said that they packed the steel uprights with explosives so that when it was time to bring it down, it'd be easy... They said every building has a lifespan and eventually it's gonna have to come down."

http://www.whiterosesociety.org/content/freehartmann/HartmannShow-(21-8-2006).mp3

I've heard some people propose that before, and it sounds like nonsense.

It would be great if we could put this question to an expert, maybe not Contr.Demol.Inc, because they might be gagged or might be part of the plot.
I guess putting the actual explosive charges into a building would be in violation of numerous safety laws concerning TNT. First the danger of it detonating accidentially and then someone could get access to them and steal them without anyone's knowledge.

Ask an "expert", and you might get even more crazy ideas.

OK, if you want to talk about crazy ones.... think about the old technology (WWII) of coating re-bar with plastique and wiring it for push-button or auto-destruction. Very stable and difficult to access. 'Don't need the structure anymore, deny it to the enemy as well'.

But this is all "crazy" speculation.

Go with the simpler; rigging a building in surprisingly short amounts of time, with surprising light and dependable wireless charges. 'Two tons of shit, 19-man team (toss in a few women to foil suspicion), six hours start to finish.'

Don't let people pretend it's harder than that. And don't try to figure it all out with ideas about 'water-coolers in the elevator lobby or a recent delivery of new trash-cans'. You'll just go nuts because 99% of the hot evidence was destroyed and carried away to be melted down.

However, you can eliminate the likelihood of tin-darts and lamp-oil hijacked by swarthy neck-stabbers with nail-clippers. That's the real crazy hypothesis. Keep the perps on the run until they are backed into a corner during a press conference. They really are that stupid and arrogant.

k

"The truth shall make you free." Why not make the truth free? We live on a priceless blue pearl, awash in a universe of fire and ice. Cut the crap.